大流行时代科研人员的伦理与责任

Development & reproduction Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-31 DOI:10.12717/DR.2021.25.4.321
Kyung-Hee Lee
{"title":"大流行时代科研人员的伦理与责任","authors":"Kyung-Hee Lee","doi":"10.12717/DR.2021.25.4.321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to critique the links between science and scientific researchers, politics and capital surrounding vaccines and vaccination in a pandemic era. It also introduces standards for adapting ethical guidelines for research under public health emergencies to specific circumstances and contexts. It also introduces ethical standards to be applied to scientific research. that is, scientific relevance, social value, cooperative partnerships, reasonable risk-benefit costs, fair and voluntary participation, independent review, and equal moral respect for participants and affected communities. It also outlines the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic-consent and other research procedure modifications proposed by Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). We are on the lookout for powerful capital and hegemonic groups inseparable from politics and important decision makers in the pandemic era - that is, scientists, supporters, and scientific civic groups. It underscores the need for an independent and formal scientific advisory body with the right balance between science and politics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72791,"journal":{"name":"Development & reproduction","volume":"25 4","pages":"321-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/05/dr-25-4-321.PMC8807136.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics and Responsibility of Scientific Researchers in a Pandemic Era.\",\"authors\":\"Kyung-Hee Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.12717/DR.2021.25.4.321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this paper is to critique the links between science and scientific researchers, politics and capital surrounding vaccines and vaccination in a pandemic era. It also introduces standards for adapting ethical guidelines for research under public health emergencies to specific circumstances and contexts. It also introduces ethical standards to be applied to scientific research. that is, scientific relevance, social value, cooperative partnerships, reasonable risk-benefit costs, fair and voluntary participation, independent review, and equal moral respect for participants and affected communities. It also outlines the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic-consent and other research procedure modifications proposed by Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). We are on the lookout for powerful capital and hegemonic groups inseparable from politics and important decision makers in the pandemic era - that is, scientists, supporters, and scientific civic groups. It underscores the need for an independent and formal scientific advisory body with the right balance between science and politics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development & reproduction\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"321-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/05/dr-25-4-321.PMC8807136.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development & reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2021.25.4.321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development & reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2021.25.4.321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是批评在大流行时代围绕疫苗和疫苗接种的科学与科学研究人员、政治与资本之间的联系。它还介绍了使突发公共卫生事件下的研究伦理准则适应具体情况和背景的标准。它还介绍了应用于科学研究的伦理标准。即科学相关性、社会价值、合作伙伴关系、合理的风险-收益成本、公平和自愿参与、独立审查以及对参与者和受影响社区的平等道德尊重。它还概述了俄勒冈健康与科学大学(OHSU)提出的COVID-19(冠状病毒病2019)大流行同意和其他研究程序修改。我们正在寻找与大流行时代的政治和重要决策者不可分割的强大资本和霸权集团,即科学家、支持者和科学民间团体。它强调需要一个独立和正式的科学咨询机构,在科学和政治之间取得适当的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethics and Responsibility of Scientific Researchers in a Pandemic Era.

The purpose of this paper is to critique the links between science and scientific researchers, politics and capital surrounding vaccines and vaccination in a pandemic era. It also introduces standards for adapting ethical guidelines for research under public health emergencies to specific circumstances and contexts. It also introduces ethical standards to be applied to scientific research. that is, scientific relevance, social value, cooperative partnerships, reasonable risk-benefit costs, fair and voluntary participation, independent review, and equal moral respect for participants and affected communities. It also outlines the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic-consent and other research procedure modifications proposed by Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU). We are on the lookout for powerful capital and hegemonic groups inseparable from politics and important decision makers in the pandemic era - that is, scientists, supporters, and scientific civic groups. It underscores the need for an independent and formal scientific advisory body with the right balance between science and politics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信