临床“经验”作为证据标准?精神病学对战后“医学改革”辩论的贡献和j rg Zutt“理解人类学”的发展]。

IF 0.2 4区哲学 Q4 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

NTM Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s00048-021-00319-2

Maike Rotzoll

{"title":"临床“经验”作为证据标准?精神病学对战后“医学改革”辩论的贡献和j<s:1> rg Zutt“理解人类学”的发展]。","authors":"Maike Rotzoll","doi":"10.1007/s00048-021-00319-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the Wiesbaden Internist Congress of 1949, Alexander Mitscherlich and Viktor von Weizsäcker called for an expansion of the scientific concept of causality to include the search for the meaning of illness in one's personal history. This called into question a traditional psychiatric paradigm which presumed somatic causes of mental illness. Additionally, common psychiatric evidence practices were put to the test. In the first part of this article, three psychiatric positions that were presented at the 1949 congress are reconstructed. In the second part, the development of one of the psychiatrists involved, Jürg Zutt, is examined by focusing on the question of the possible effects of the Wiesbaden debate on his scientific reorientation as well as its consequences for his view of psychiatric evidence.","PeriodicalId":43143,"journal":{"name":"NTM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical \\\"Experience\\\" as a Criterion of Evidence? Psychiatric Contributions to a Post-War Debate on a \\\"Reform of Medicine\\\" and the Development of Jürg Zutt's \\\"Understanding Anthropology\\\"].\",\"authors\":\"Maike Rotzoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00048-021-00319-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the Wiesbaden Internist Congress of 1949, Alexander Mitscherlich and Viktor von Weizsäcker called for an expansion of the scientific concept of causality to include the search for the meaning of illness in one's personal history. This called into question a traditional psychiatric paradigm which presumed somatic causes of mental illness. Additionally, common psychiatric evidence practices were put to the test. In the first part of this article, three psychiatric positions that were presented at the 1949 congress are reconstructed. In the second part, the development of one of the psychiatrists involved, Jürg Zutt, is examined by focusing on the question of the possible effects of the Wiesbaden debate on his scientific reorientation as well as its consequences for his view of psychiatric evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NTM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NTM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-021-00319-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NTM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00048-021-00319-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在1949年威斯巴登内科医师大会上，亚历山大·米切利希(Alexander Mitscherlich)和维克多·冯(Viktor von Weizsäcker)呼吁扩大因果关系的科学概念，包括在个人历史中寻找疾病的意义。这对传统的精神病学范式提出了质疑，该范式假定精神疾病的躯体原因。此外，常见的精神病学证据实践进行了测试。在本文的第一部分中，对1949年大会上提出的三个精神病学立场进行了重建。在第二部分中，通过关注威斯巴登辩论对他的科学重新定位的可能影响以及对他的精神病学证据观点的影响，研究了其中一位精神病学家j rg Zutt的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

[Clinical "Experience" as a Criterion of Evidence? Psychiatric Contributions to a Post-War Debate on a "Reform of Medicine" and the Development of Jürg Zutt's "Understanding Anthropology"].

At the Wiesbaden Internist Congress of 1949, Alexander Mitscherlich and Viktor von Weizsäcker called for an expansion of the scientific concept of causality to include the search for the meaning of illness in one's personal history. This called into question a traditional psychiatric paradigm which presumed somatic causes of mental illness. Additionally, common psychiatric evidence practices were put to the test. In the first part of this article, three psychiatric positions that were presented at the 1949 congress are reconstructed. In the second part, the development of one of the psychiatrists involved, Jürg Zutt, is examined by focusing on the question of the possible effects of the Wiesbaden debate on his scientific reorientation as well as its consequences for his view of psychiatric evidence.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

NTM HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： NTM ist die größte Zeitschrift für Wissenschafts-, Technik- und Medizingeschichte im deutschen Sprachraum. Sie bietet ein internationales Forum für Forschungsbeiträge, Debatten und Rezensionen aus dem Gesamtgebiet der Wissenschafts-, Technik- und Medizingeschichte in allen Epochen und unterschiedlichen Regionen. Wir veröffentlichen innovative Beiträge, die an neuere theoretische und methodische Ansätze und Debatten anknüpfen, neues empirisches Material erschließen oder neue Forschungsfelder eröffnen. Neben der Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, der Technik und der Medizin sind auch Beiträge zur Geschichte der Geistes-, Sozial- und Kulturwissenschaften willkommen. NTM erscheint vierteljährlich. Neben dem klassischen, individuellen Forschungsartikel und Buchrezensionen publiziert NTM als weitere Textgattungen das „Forum“, das „Fundstück“ sowie “Essay Reviews”: - Provokative oder auch kontroverse Beiträge stoßen im Forum Debatten und Fragen an, die unser Feld kommend prägen werden. - Das Fundstück erschließt vergessene Objekt-, Bild- oder Schriftquellen von hoher historischer Relevanz. - Essay Reviews bieten entlang von Literaturbesprechungen einen kritischen Überblick über ein entstehendes Forschungsfeld. - Außerdem erscheinen Themenhefte (4-6 Artikel) sowie Special Sections (3-4 Artikel), die ein neues Forschungsfeld abstecken bzw. dessen Potential exemplarisch aufzeigen. NTM wird seit 2018 von der Gesellschaft für die Geschichte der Wissenschaften, der Medizin, und der Technik (GWMT) herausgegeben (www.gwmt.de). Zuvor war NTM das wissenschaftliche Organ der DGGMNT (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Medizin, Naturwissenschaft en und Technik e. V.). Die Zeitschrift hat eine lange Tradition und wurde 1960 von Gerhard Harig und Alexander Mette in Leipzig gegründet. • Doppelt anonymes Begutachtungsverfahren • Mischung aus unterschiedlichen Textgattungen (Artikel, Fundstück, Forum, Essay Reviews, Rezensionen) • Publikationssprachen: Deutsch, Englisch und Französisch • Volltext-Zugriff fu¨r alle Institutionen des DEAL Konsortiums ab 2020. Weitere Informationen zu DEAL unter https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/institutional-agreements/oaforgermany-de NTM is the largest and most comprehensive journal for history of science, technology, and medicine in the German-speaking world. It offers an international forum for research articles, debates and reviews in the entire field of history of science, technology, and medicine in all epochs and various regions. The journal focuses on innovative theoretical and methodological approaches and discussions which make new empirical material or areas of research accessible. Contributions to the history of science, technology, and medicine, but also to the history of the social sciences and the humanities are welcome. NTM appears four times a year. Aside from classic individual research articles and book reviews, NTM publishes as additional text genres the “Forum”, the “Lost & Found”, and also “Essay Reviews”: - In the Forum, provocative or controversial contributions encourage debates and questions, that are set to shape the future of our field. - Lost & Found aims at exploring forgotten objects and other sources of great historical relevance. - Essay Reviews provide a critical overview of emerging research fields along literature reviews. - Moreover, NTM publishes Special Issues (4 – 6 articles) as well as Special Sections (3-4 articles), are aiming at defining new research fields or demonstrating their potential. NTM has been published under the auspices of the „Gesellschaft für die Geschichte der Wissenschaften, der Medizin, und der Technik (GWMT)”, (www.gwmt.de) since 2008. Before, NTM used to be the scientific body of the DGGMNT (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Geschichte der Medizin, Naturwissenschaft en und Technik e. V.). The journal has a long tradition and was founded in 1960 by Gerhard Harig and Alexander Mette in Leipzig. • Double-blind peer review process • Mixture of different text genres (articles, lost & found, forum, essay reviews, reviews) • Papers are accepted for publication in German, English, and French • Open access to the full-text version under country-specific conditions Bibliographie N.T.M. Zuerst erschienen 1960 / first published in 1960 Namensänderung ab 1.1.2008 / renamed in 2008 1 Volumen pro Jahr, 4 Hefte pro Volumen / 1 vol. per year, 4 issues per volume ca. 500 Seiten pro Volumen / 500 pages per volume Format: 15.5 x 23.5 cm ISSN 0036-6978 (print) ISSN 1420-9144 (electronic)