“数据是新的石油”:在研究人员处理具有经济价值的资源的时代,公民科学和知情同意。

IF 3.1 Q1 Arts and Humanities
Etain Quigley, Ingrid Holme, David M Doyle, Aileen K Ho, Eamonn Ambrose, Katie Kirkwood, Gerardine Doyle
{"title":"“数据是新的石油”:在研究人员处理具有经济价值的资源的时代,公民科学和知情同意。","authors":"Etain Quigley,&nbsp;Ingrid Holme,&nbsp;David M Doyle,&nbsp;Aileen K Ho,&nbsp;Eamonn Ambrose,&nbsp;Katie Kirkwood,&nbsp;Gerardine Doyle","doi":"10.1186/s40504-021-00118-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As with other areas of the social world, academic research in the contemporary healthcare setting has undergone adaptation and change. For example, research methods are increasingly incorporating citizen participation in the research process, and there has been an increase in collaborative research that brings academic and industry partners together. There have been numerous positive outcomes associated with both of these growing methodological and collaborative processes; nonetheless, both bring with them ethical considerations that require careful thought and attention. This paper addresses the ethical considerations that research teams must consider when using participatory methods and/or when working with industry and outlines a novel informed consent matrix designed to maintain the high ethical standard to which academic research in the healthcare arena has traditionally adhered.</p>","PeriodicalId":37861,"journal":{"name":"Life Sciences, Society and Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662857/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Data is the new oil\\\": citizen science and informed consent in an era of researchers handling of an economically valuable resource.\",\"authors\":\"Etain Quigley,&nbsp;Ingrid Holme,&nbsp;David M Doyle,&nbsp;Aileen K Ho,&nbsp;Eamonn Ambrose,&nbsp;Katie Kirkwood,&nbsp;Gerardine Doyle\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40504-021-00118-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As with other areas of the social world, academic research in the contemporary healthcare setting has undergone adaptation and change. For example, research methods are increasingly incorporating citizen participation in the research process, and there has been an increase in collaborative research that brings academic and industry partners together. There have been numerous positive outcomes associated with both of these growing methodological and collaborative processes; nonetheless, both bring with them ethical considerations that require careful thought and attention. This paper addresses the ethical considerations that research teams must consider when using participatory methods and/or when working with industry and outlines a novel informed consent matrix designed to maintain the high ethical standard to which academic research in the healthcare arena has traditionally adhered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life Sciences, Society and Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8662857/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life Sciences, Society and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-021-00118-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life Sciences, Society and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-021-00118-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

与社会世界的其他领域一样,当代医疗保健环境中的学术研究也经历了适应和变化。例如,研究方法越来越多地将公民参与纳入研究过程,将学术界和工业界合作伙伴聚集在一起的合作研究也有所增加。与这些不断发展的方法和协作过程相关的许多积极成果;然而,两者都带来了需要仔细思考和关注的伦理问题。本文解决了研究团队在使用参与式方法和/或与行业合作时必须考虑的伦理问题,并概述了一种新的知情同意矩阵,旨在维持医疗保健领域学术研究传统上坚持的高道德标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

"Data is the new oil": citizen science and informed consent in an era of researchers handling of an economically valuable resource.

"Data is the new oil": citizen science and informed consent in an era of researchers handling of an economically valuable resource.

As with other areas of the social world, academic research in the contemporary healthcare setting has undergone adaptation and change. For example, research methods are increasingly incorporating citizen participation in the research process, and there has been an increase in collaborative research that brings academic and industry partners together. There have been numerous positive outcomes associated with both of these growing methodological and collaborative processes; nonetheless, both bring with them ethical considerations that require careful thought and attention. This paper addresses the ethical considerations that research teams must consider when using participatory methods and/or when working with industry and outlines a novel informed consent matrix designed to maintain the high ethical standard to which academic research in the healthcare arena has traditionally adhered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Life Sciences, Society and Policy
Life Sciences, Society and Policy Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Life Sciences, Society and Policy (LSSP) is to analyse social, ethical and legal dimensions of the most dynamic branches of life sciences and technologies, and to discuss ways to foster responsible innovation, sustainable development and user-driven social policies. LSSP provides an academic forum for engaged scholarship at the intersection of life sciences, philosophy, bioethics, science studies and policy research, and covers a broad area of inquiry both in emerging research areas such as genomics, bioinformatics, biophysics, molecular engineering, nanotechnology and synthetic biology, and in more applied fields such as translational medicine, food science, environmental science, climate studies, research on animals, sustainability, science education and others. The goal is to produce insights, tools and recommendations that are relevant not only for academic researchers and teachers, but also for civil society, policy makers and industry, as well as for professionals in education, health care and the media, thus contributing to better research practices, better policies, and a more sustainable global society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信