肝素诱导的血小板减少症诊断:比较肝素诱导的血小板活化试验和14c - 5 -羟色胺释放试验的回顾性研究。

TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2021-09-24 eCollection Date: 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1653-5065
Marie-Caroline Gonthier, Nicolas Gendron, Philippine Eloy, Marie-Charlotte Bourrienne, Martine Alhenc-Gelas, Claire Pouplard, Bernard Tardy, Jean Szymezak, Charles Burdet, Vasiliki Gkalea, Dorothée Faille, Nadine Ajzenberg
{"title":"肝素诱导的血小板减少症诊断:比较肝素诱导的血小板活化试验和14c - 5 -羟色胺释放试验的回顾性研究。","authors":"Marie-Caroline Gonthier,&nbsp;Nicolas Gendron,&nbsp;Philippine Eloy,&nbsp;Marie-Charlotte Bourrienne,&nbsp;Martine Alhenc-Gelas,&nbsp;Claire Pouplard,&nbsp;Bernard Tardy,&nbsp;Jean Szymezak,&nbsp;Charles Burdet,&nbsp;Vasiliki Gkalea,&nbsp;Dorothée Faille,&nbsp;Nadine Ajzenberg","doi":"10.1055/a-1653-5065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laboratory confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is of crucial importance and remains challenging and relies on platelet functional assays highlighting the presence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies in patient serum or plasma. Platelet functional assays using washed platelets include the <sup>14</sup> C-serotonin release assay (SRA), usually described as the gold standard, and the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA). Since its first comparison with SRA there has been no additional published study regarding HIPA diagnostic performances compared with SRA. Aim of our retrospective study was to compare the concordance between HIPA and SRA in HIT suspected-patients with positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies between October 2010 and October 2015. Fifty-five HIT-suspected patients who beneficiated from both HIPA and SRA were included. Positive and negative percent agreements were 83.8% (95% CI 68.0-93.8%) and 66.7% (95% CI 41.0-86.7%), respectively. Overall percent agreement was 78.2% (95% CI 65.0-92.2%). Agreement was higher in patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass with extracorporeal circulation circuit for cardiac surgery. We also confirm that the use of a minimum of 2 platelet donors to establish positive HIT diagnosis and 4 platelet donors to exclude HIT diagnosis allows obtaining a good agreement with SRA. Although HIPA and SRA were performed with different platelet donors and in different laboratories, HIPA had a good positive agreement with SRA for HIT diagnosis, showing that HIPA is a useful functional assay that does not require radioactivity and could be developed worldwide to improve HIT diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":22238,"journal":{"name":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"5 4","pages":"e507-e512"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/e3/10-1055-a-1653-5065.PMC8577886.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study Comparing Heparin-induced Platelet Activation Test to <sup>14</sup> C-serotonin Release Assay.\",\"authors\":\"Marie-Caroline Gonthier,&nbsp;Nicolas Gendron,&nbsp;Philippine Eloy,&nbsp;Marie-Charlotte Bourrienne,&nbsp;Martine Alhenc-Gelas,&nbsp;Claire Pouplard,&nbsp;Bernard Tardy,&nbsp;Jean Szymezak,&nbsp;Charles Burdet,&nbsp;Vasiliki Gkalea,&nbsp;Dorothée Faille,&nbsp;Nadine Ajzenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1653-5065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Laboratory confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is of crucial importance and remains challenging and relies on platelet functional assays highlighting the presence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies in patient serum or plasma. Platelet functional assays using washed platelets include the <sup>14</sup> C-serotonin release assay (SRA), usually described as the gold standard, and the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA). Since its first comparison with SRA there has been no additional published study regarding HIPA diagnostic performances compared with SRA. Aim of our retrospective study was to compare the concordance between HIPA and SRA in HIT suspected-patients with positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies between October 2010 and October 2015. Fifty-five HIT-suspected patients who beneficiated from both HIPA and SRA were included. Positive and negative percent agreements were 83.8% (95% CI 68.0-93.8%) and 66.7% (95% CI 41.0-86.7%), respectively. Overall percent agreement was 78.2% (95% CI 65.0-92.2%). Agreement was higher in patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass with extracorporeal circulation circuit for cardiac surgery. We also confirm that the use of a minimum of 2 platelet donors to establish positive HIT diagnosis and 4 platelet donors to exclude HIT diagnosis allows obtaining a good agreement with SRA. Although HIPA and SRA were performed with different platelet donors and in different laboratories, HIPA had a good positive agreement with SRA for HIT diagnosis, showing that HIPA is a useful functional assay that does not require radioactivity and could be developed worldwide to improve HIT diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"5 4\",\"pages\":\"e507-e512\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b0/e3/10-1055-a-1653-5065.PMC8577886.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1653-5065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TH Open: Companion Journal to Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1653-5065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)的实验室确认是至关重要的,但仍然具有挑战性,并且依赖于血小板功能测定,强调患者血清或血浆中存在肝素依赖性血小板活化抗体。使用洗涤血小板的血小板功能测定包括通常被称为金标准的14c - 5 -羟色胺释放测定(SRA)和肝素诱导血小板活化测定(HIPA)。自首次与SRA比较以来,没有发表关于HIPA诊断性能与SRA比较的其他研究。我们回顾性研究的目的是比较2010年10月至2015年10月抗pf4 /肝素抗体阳性的HIT疑似患者HIPA和SRA的一致性。55名同时受益于HIPA和SRA的hit疑似患者被纳入研究。阳性和阴性百分比分别为83.8% (95% CI 68.0-93.8%)和66.7% (95% CI 41.0-86.7%)。总体同意率为78.2% (95% CI 65.0-92.2%)。在接受体外循环体外循环心脏手术的患者中,一致性更高。我们还证实,使用至少2个血小板供体来确定HIT阳性诊断,使用至少4个血小板供体来排除HIT诊断,可以与SRA获得良好的一致性。虽然HIPA和SRA是在不同的血小板供体和不同的实验室进行的,但HIPA与SRA在HIT诊断上有很好的阳性一致性,这表明HIPA是一种有用的功能检测,不需要放射性,可以在世界范围内发展,以提高HIT的诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia Diagnosis: A Retrospective Study Comparing Heparin-induced Platelet Activation Test to 14 C-serotonin Release Assay.

Laboratory confirmation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is of crucial importance and remains challenging and relies on platelet functional assays highlighting the presence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies in patient serum or plasma. Platelet functional assays using washed platelets include the 14 C-serotonin release assay (SRA), usually described as the gold standard, and the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPA). Since its first comparison with SRA there has been no additional published study regarding HIPA diagnostic performances compared with SRA. Aim of our retrospective study was to compare the concordance between HIPA and SRA in HIT suspected-patients with positive anti-PF4/heparin antibodies between October 2010 and October 2015. Fifty-five HIT-suspected patients who beneficiated from both HIPA and SRA were included. Positive and negative percent agreements were 83.8% (95% CI 68.0-93.8%) and 66.7% (95% CI 41.0-86.7%), respectively. Overall percent agreement was 78.2% (95% CI 65.0-92.2%). Agreement was higher in patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass with extracorporeal circulation circuit for cardiac surgery. We also confirm that the use of a minimum of 2 platelet donors to establish positive HIT diagnosis and 4 platelet donors to exclude HIT diagnosis allows obtaining a good agreement with SRA. Although HIPA and SRA were performed with different platelet donors and in different laboratories, HIPA had a good positive agreement with SRA for HIT diagnosis, showing that HIPA is a useful functional assay that does not require radioactivity and could be developed worldwide to improve HIT diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信