不同新鲜气体流量和不同麻醉剂对手术患者气道温度和湿度的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。

IF 3 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Irem Gumus Ozcan, Ozkan Onal, Aysun Ozdemirkan, Ali Saltali, Mehmet Sari
{"title":"不同新鲜气体流量和不同麻醉剂对手术患者气道温度和湿度的影响:一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Irem Gumus Ozcan,&nbsp;Ozkan Onal,&nbsp;Aysun Ozdemirkan,&nbsp;Ali Saltali,&nbsp;Mehmet Sari","doi":"10.4103/2045-9912.330691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was aimed to investigate the effects of different fresh gas (oxygen + air) flow rates and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity when using the same anesthesia machine in patients undergoing general anesthesia. In this prospective, observational study, 240 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II between the age of 18-65 years to be operated under general anesthesia were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the fresh gas flow rate (3-6 L/min). Each of the two main groups was further divided into three subgroups according to the administered anesthetic gases and drugs. The resulting six groups were further divided into two subgroups according to whether the heat and humidity exchanger filter (HME) was attached to the breathing circuit, and the study was carried out on a total of 12 groups. The temperature and humidity of the inspired air were recorded every 10 minutes using an electronic thermo-hygrometer. The inspired temperature and humidity were greater in patients ventilated at 3 L/min compared to the 6 L/min group and in HME (+) patients compared to HME (-), regardless of the type of anesthetics. HME application makes the air more physiological for the respiratory tract by increasing the temperature and humidity of the air regardless of the anesthetic agent. This study was approved by Ethics Committee Review of Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine (No. 2017/261) in September 2017, and was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry (identifier No. NCT04204746) on December 19, 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":18559,"journal":{"name":"Medical Gas Research","volume":"12 3","pages":"83-90"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7a/34/MGR-12-83.PMC8690851.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different fresh gas flows and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity in surgical patients: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Irem Gumus Ozcan,&nbsp;Ozkan Onal,&nbsp;Aysun Ozdemirkan,&nbsp;Ali Saltali,&nbsp;Mehmet Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2045-9912.330691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study was aimed to investigate the effects of different fresh gas (oxygen + air) flow rates and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity when using the same anesthesia machine in patients undergoing general anesthesia. In this prospective, observational study, 240 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II between the age of 18-65 years to be operated under general anesthesia were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the fresh gas flow rate (3-6 L/min). Each of the two main groups was further divided into three subgroups according to the administered anesthetic gases and drugs. The resulting six groups were further divided into two subgroups according to whether the heat and humidity exchanger filter (HME) was attached to the breathing circuit, and the study was carried out on a total of 12 groups. The temperature and humidity of the inspired air were recorded every 10 minutes using an electronic thermo-hygrometer. The inspired temperature and humidity were greater in patients ventilated at 3 L/min compared to the 6 L/min group and in HME (+) patients compared to HME (-), regardless of the type of anesthetics. HME application makes the air more physiological for the respiratory tract by increasing the temperature and humidity of the air regardless of the anesthetic agent. This study was approved by Ethics Committee Review of Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine (No. 2017/261) in September 2017, and was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry (identifier No. NCT04204746) on December 19, 2019.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Gas Research\",\"volume\":\"12 3\",\"pages\":\"83-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/7a/34/MGR-12-83.PMC8690851.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Gas Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.330691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Gas Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.330691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在探讨不同新鲜气体(氧气+空气)流速及不同麻醉药物对全麻患者使用同一麻醉机时气道温度和湿度的影响。在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,选取240例年龄在18-65岁之间的美国麻醉学会(ASA) I-II级全麻手术患者,根据新鲜气体流速(3-6 L/min)分为两组。根据麻醉气体和麻醉药物的不同,两组又分为三组。根据是否在呼吸回路上附加了热湿交换器过滤器(HME),将得到的6组进一步分为2个亚组,共对12组进行了研究。每10分钟用电子温湿计记录吸入空气的温度和湿度。无论麻醉药类型如何,3l /min通气的患者吸入温度和湿度高于6l /min通气组,HME(+)患者吸入温度和湿度高于HME(-)。HME的应用通过提高空气的温度和湿度,使空气对呼吸道更加生理性,而不管麻醉剂是什么。本研究于2017年9月获得Selcuk大学医学院伦理委员会审查(No. 2017/261)批准,并在临床试验登记处注册(标识符No. 2017/261)。NCT04204746)于2019年12月19日生效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of different fresh gas flows and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity in surgical patients: a prospective observational study.

Effects of different fresh gas flows and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity in surgical patients: a prospective observational study.

Effects of different fresh gas flows and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity in surgical patients: a prospective observational study.

Effects of different fresh gas flows and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity in surgical patients: a prospective observational study.

This study was aimed to investigate the effects of different fresh gas (oxygen + air) flow rates and different anesthetics on airway temperature and humidity when using the same anesthesia machine in patients undergoing general anesthesia. In this prospective, observational study, 240 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-II between the age of 18-65 years to be operated under general anesthesia were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the fresh gas flow rate (3-6 L/min). Each of the two main groups was further divided into three subgroups according to the administered anesthetic gases and drugs. The resulting six groups were further divided into two subgroups according to whether the heat and humidity exchanger filter (HME) was attached to the breathing circuit, and the study was carried out on a total of 12 groups. The temperature and humidity of the inspired air were recorded every 10 minutes using an electronic thermo-hygrometer. The inspired temperature and humidity were greater in patients ventilated at 3 L/min compared to the 6 L/min group and in HME (+) patients compared to HME (-), regardless of the type of anesthetics. HME application makes the air more physiological for the respiratory tract by increasing the temperature and humidity of the air regardless of the anesthetic agent. This study was approved by Ethics Committee Review of Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine (No. 2017/261) in September 2017, and was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry (identifier No. NCT04204746) on December 19, 2019.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Gas Research
Medical Gas Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Medical Gas Research is an open access journal which publishes basic, translational, and clinical research focusing on the neurobiology as well as multidisciplinary aspects of medical gas research and their applications to related disorders. The journal covers all areas of medical gas research, but also has several special sections. Authors can submit directly to these sections, whose peer-review process is overseen by our distinguished Section Editors: Inert gases - Edited by Xuejun Sun and Mark Coburn, Gasotransmitters - Edited by Atsunori Nakao and John Calvert, Oxygen and diving medicine - Edited by Daniel Rossignol and Ke Jian Liu, Anesthetic gases - Edited by Richard Applegate and Zhongcong Xie, Medical gas in other fields of biology - Edited by John Zhang. Medical gas is a large family including oxygen, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, nitrous oxide, carbon disulfide, argon, helium and other noble gases. These medical gases are used in multiple fields of clinical practice and basic science research including anesthesiology, hyperbaric oxygen medicine, diving medicine, internal medicine, emergency medicine, surgery, and many basic sciences disciplines such as physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, microbiology and neurosciences. Due to the unique nature of medical gas practice, Medical Gas Research will serve as an information platform for educational and technological advances in the field of medical gas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信