通过测量到直肠系膜筋膜的距离来更好地确定cT3直肠癌的预后:一项多中心研究。

Xiaoyan Zhang, Qiaoyuan Lu, Xiangjie Guo, Wuteng Cao, Hongmei Zhang, Tao Yu, Xiaoting Li, Zhen Guan, Xueping Li, Ruijia Sun, Yingshi Sun
{"title":"通过测量到直肠系膜筋膜的距离来更好地确定cT3直肠癌的预后:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Xiaoyan Zhang,&nbsp;Qiaoyuan Lu,&nbsp;Xiangjie Guo,&nbsp;Wuteng Cao,&nbsp;Hongmei Zhang,&nbsp;Tao Yu,&nbsp;Xiaoting Li,&nbsp;Zhen Guan,&nbsp;Xueping Li,&nbsp;Ruijia Sun,&nbsp;Yingshi Sun","doi":"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.05.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To forward the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based distance between the deepest tumor invasion and mesorectal fascia (DMRF), and to explore its prognosis differentiation value in cT3 stage rectal cancer with comparison of cT3 substage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study including cT3 rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery from January 2013 to September 2014. DMRF and cT3 substage were evaluated from baseline MRI. The cutoff of DMRF was determined by disease progression. Multivariate cox regression was used to test the prognostic values of baseline variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 804 patients were included, of which 226 (28.1%) developed progression. A DMRF cutoff of 7 mm was chosen. DMRF category, the clock position of the deepest position of tumor invasion (CDTI) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) were independent predictors for disease progression, and hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.26 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.13-0.56], 1.88 (95% CI, 1.33-2.65) and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.13-2.18), respectively. cT3 substage was not a predictor for disease progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The measurement of DMRF value on baseline MRI can better distinguish cT3 rectal cancer prognosis rather than cT3 substage, and was recommended in clinical evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9830,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","volume":"33 5","pages":"606-615"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/f2/cjcr-33-5-606.PMC8580799.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyan Zhang,&nbsp;Qiaoyuan Lu,&nbsp;Xiangjie Guo,&nbsp;Wuteng Cao,&nbsp;Hongmei Zhang,&nbsp;Tao Yu,&nbsp;Xiaoting Li,&nbsp;Zhen Guan,&nbsp;Xueping Li,&nbsp;Ruijia Sun,&nbsp;Yingshi Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.05.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To forward the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based distance between the deepest tumor invasion and mesorectal fascia (DMRF), and to explore its prognosis differentiation value in cT3 stage rectal cancer with comparison of cT3 substage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study including cT3 rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery from January 2013 to September 2014. DMRF and cT3 substage were evaluated from baseline MRI. The cutoff of DMRF was determined by disease progression. Multivariate cox regression was used to test the prognostic values of baseline variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 804 patients were included, of which 226 (28.1%) developed progression. A DMRF cutoff of 7 mm was chosen. DMRF category, the clock position of the deepest position of tumor invasion (CDTI) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) were independent predictors for disease progression, and hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.26 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.13-0.56], 1.88 (95% CI, 1.33-2.65) and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.13-2.18), respectively. cT3 substage was not a predictor for disease progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The measurement of DMRF value on baseline MRI can better distinguish cT3 rectal cancer prognosis rather than cT3 substage, and was recommended in clinical evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"606-615\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/de/f2/cjcr-33-5-606.PMC8580799.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.05.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.05.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:提出基于磁共振成像(MRI)的肿瘤最深处浸润至直肠系膜筋膜距离(DMRF),并与cT3亚期比较,探讨其在cT3期直肠癌中的预后鉴别价值。方法:这是一项回顾性、多中心队列研究,包括2013年1月至2014年9月接受新辅助放化疗后根治性手术的cT3直肠癌患者。从基线MRI评估DMRF和cT3分期。DMRF的截止时间由疾病进展决定。采用多变量cox回归检验基线变量的预后价值。结果:共纳入804例患者,其中226例(28.1%)进展。选择7毫米的DMRF截止点。DMRF类别、肿瘤浸润最深部位时钟位置(CDTI)和外静脉浸润(EMVI)是疾病进展的独立预测因子,风险比(hr)分别为0.26[95%可信区间(95% CI), 0.13-0.56]、1.88 (95% CI, 1.33-2.65)和1.57 (95% CI, 1.13-2.18)。cT3亚分期不是疾病进展的预测因子。结论:在基线MRI上测量DMRF值能更好地判断cT3直肠癌的预后,而不是判断cT3亚型,可推荐用于临床评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study.

Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study.

Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study.

Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study.

Objective: To forward the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based distance between the deepest tumor invasion and mesorectal fascia (DMRF), and to explore its prognosis differentiation value in cT3 stage rectal cancer with comparison of cT3 substage.

Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study including cT3 rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery from January 2013 to September 2014. DMRF and cT3 substage were evaluated from baseline MRI. The cutoff of DMRF was determined by disease progression. Multivariate cox regression was used to test the prognostic values of baseline variables.

Results: A total of 804 patients were included, of which 226 (28.1%) developed progression. A DMRF cutoff of 7 mm was chosen. DMRF category, the clock position of the deepest position of tumor invasion (CDTI) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) were independent predictors for disease progression, and hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.26 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.13-0.56], 1.88 (95% CI, 1.33-2.65) and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.13-2.18), respectively. cT3 substage was not a predictor for disease progression.

Conclusions: The measurement of DMRF value on baseline MRI can better distinguish cT3 rectal cancer prognosis rather than cT3 substage, and was recommended in clinical evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信