利用新型探针共聚焦激光内镜(Cellvizio®)观察猪内毒素休克模型,观察液体治疗对肠系膜微循环的影响。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Research Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-17 DOI:10.1159/000519693
Charlotte Daniere, Guillaume Louart, Benjamin Louart, Marylène Bacle, Florian Bazalgette, Antonia Perez Martin, Laurent Muller, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Claire Roger
{"title":"利用新型探针共聚焦激光内镜(Cellvizio®)观察猪内毒素休克模型,观察液体治疗对肠系膜微循环的影响。","authors":"Charlotte Daniere,&nbsp;Guillaume Louart,&nbsp;Benjamin Louart,&nbsp;Marylène Bacle,&nbsp;Florian Bazalgette,&nbsp;Antonia Perez Martin,&nbsp;Laurent Muller,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Lefrant,&nbsp;Claire Roger","doi":"10.1159/000519693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microcirculatory alterations have been observed at the early phase of sepsis, although macrocirculation seems preserved. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of crystalloid fluid therapy on mesenteric microcirculation, assessed by using the confocal laser endomicroscope Cellvizio®, in an endotoxic porcine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It is a prospective endotoxic shock (lipopolysaccharide infusion) experimental trial. Piglets were divided into 3 groups: 6 in the sham group (no LPS injection, no fluid), 9 in the control group (LPS infusion, no fluid), and 6 in the crystalloids group (LPS infusion and fluid resuscitation with crystalloids). Fluid resuscitation consisted in a fluid bolus of 20 mL/kg 0.9% saline over 30 min followed by a 10 mL/kg/h fluid rate over 4 h. Mesenteric microcirculation was assessed using a confocal laser endomicroscope (Cellvizio®). Blood flow within capillaries was visually assessed according to the point of care microcirculation (POEM) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the 3 groups were similar regarding hemodynamic, biological, and microcirculatory parameters. At T360, the POEM score significantly decreased in the control and crystalloids groups, whereas it remained unchanged in the sham group (respectively, 1.62 ± 1.06, 1.2 ± 0.45, and 5.0 ± 0, p = 0.011). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at T360 between the sham and crystalloids groups (3.1 ± 0.8 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.132) or between the control and crystalloids groups (2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant improvement of microcirculatory alterations after crystalloids resuscitation despite improvement in macrocirculatory parameters in early experimental sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Fluid Therapy on Mesenteric Microcirculation Using New Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (Cellvizio®) in a Porcine Model of Endotoxic Shock.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Daniere,&nbsp;Guillaume Louart,&nbsp;Benjamin Louart,&nbsp;Marylène Bacle,&nbsp;Florian Bazalgette,&nbsp;Antonia Perez Martin,&nbsp;Laurent Muller,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Lefrant,&nbsp;Claire Roger\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000519693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microcirculatory alterations have been observed at the early phase of sepsis, although macrocirculation seems preserved. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of crystalloid fluid therapy on mesenteric microcirculation, assessed by using the confocal laser endomicroscope Cellvizio®, in an endotoxic porcine model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It is a prospective endotoxic shock (lipopolysaccharide infusion) experimental trial. Piglets were divided into 3 groups: 6 in the sham group (no LPS injection, no fluid), 9 in the control group (LPS infusion, no fluid), and 6 in the crystalloids group (LPS infusion and fluid resuscitation with crystalloids). Fluid resuscitation consisted in a fluid bolus of 20 mL/kg 0.9% saline over 30 min followed by a 10 mL/kg/h fluid rate over 4 h. Mesenteric microcirculation was assessed using a confocal laser endomicroscope (Cellvizio®). Blood flow within capillaries was visually assessed according to the point of care microcirculation (POEM) score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the 3 groups were similar regarding hemodynamic, biological, and microcirculatory parameters. At T360, the POEM score significantly decreased in the control and crystalloids groups, whereas it remained unchanged in the sham group (respectively, 1.62 ± 1.06, 1.2 ± 0.45, and 5.0 ± 0, p = 0.011). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at T360 between the sham and crystalloids groups (3.1 ± 0.8 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.132) or between the control and crystalloids groups (2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was no significant improvement of microcirculatory alterations after crystalloids resuscitation despite improvement in macrocirculatory parameters in early experimental sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519693\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000519693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在脓毒症早期,微循环改变已被观察到,尽管大循环似乎保留。本研究的目的是分析晶体液体治疗对内毒素猪模型肠系膜微循环的影响,采用共聚焦激光内镜显微镜Cellvizio®进行评估。方法:采用前瞻性内毒素休克(脂多糖输注)实验。将仔猪分为3组:假手术组6头(不注射LPS,不补液),对照组9头(注射LPS,不补液),晶体液组6头(注射LPS,加晶体液复苏)。液体复苏包括在30分钟内注入20 mL/kg 0.9%生理盐水,然后在4小时内注入10 mL/kg/h的液体。使用共聚焦激光内镜(Cellvizio®)评估肠系膜微循环。根据护理点微循环(POEM)评分目测毛细血管内血流。结果:在基线时,三组在血液动力学、生物学和微循环参数方面相似。T360时,对照组和晶体药物组的POEM评分显著降低,而假手术组的POEM评分保持不变(分别为1.62±1.06、1.2±0.45和5.0±0,p = 0.011)。T360时心输出量在假手术组和晶体组之间无显著差异(3.1±0.8 vs. 2.3±0.6,p = 0.132),对照组和晶体组之间无显著差异(2.0±0.6 vs. 2.3±0.6,p = 0.90)。结论:晶体复苏对早期脓毒症患者的微循环改变无明显改善,但对早期脓毒症患者的大循环参数有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Fluid Therapy on Mesenteric Microcirculation Using New Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (Cellvizio®) in a Porcine Model of Endotoxic Shock.

Background: Microcirculatory alterations have been observed at the early phase of sepsis, although macrocirculation seems preserved. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of crystalloid fluid therapy on mesenteric microcirculation, assessed by using the confocal laser endomicroscope Cellvizio®, in an endotoxic porcine model.

Methods: It is a prospective endotoxic shock (lipopolysaccharide infusion) experimental trial. Piglets were divided into 3 groups: 6 in the sham group (no LPS injection, no fluid), 9 in the control group (LPS infusion, no fluid), and 6 in the crystalloids group (LPS infusion and fluid resuscitation with crystalloids). Fluid resuscitation consisted in a fluid bolus of 20 mL/kg 0.9% saline over 30 min followed by a 10 mL/kg/h fluid rate over 4 h. Mesenteric microcirculation was assessed using a confocal laser endomicroscope (Cellvizio®). Blood flow within capillaries was visually assessed according to the point of care microcirculation (POEM) score.

Results: At baseline, the 3 groups were similar regarding hemodynamic, biological, and microcirculatory parameters. At T360, the POEM score significantly decreased in the control and crystalloids groups, whereas it remained unchanged in the sham group (respectively, 1.62 ± 1.06, 1.2 ± 0.45, and 5.0 ± 0, p = 0.011). There was no significant difference in cardiac output at T360 between the sham and crystalloids groups (3.1 ± 0.8 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.132) or between the control and crystalloids groups (2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.3 ± 0.6, p = 0.90).

Conclusion: There was no significant improvement of microcirculatory alterations after crystalloids resuscitation despite improvement in macrocirculatory parameters in early experimental sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Research
Journal of Vascular Research 医学-生理学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''Journal of Vascular Research'' publishes original articles and reviews of scientific excellence in vascular and microvascular biology, physiology and pathophysiology. The scope of the journal covers a broad spectrum of vascular and lymphatic research, including vascular structure, vascular function, haemodynamics, mechanics, cell signalling, intercellular communication, growth and differentiation. JVR''s ''Vascular Update'' series regularly presents state-of-the-art reviews on hot topics in vascular biology. Manuscript processing times are, consistent with stringent review, kept as short as possible due to electronic submission. All articles are published online first, ensuring rapid publication. The ''Journal of Vascular Research'' is the official journal of the European Society for Microcirculation. A biennial prize is awarded to the authors of the best paper published in the journal over the previous two years, thus encouraging young scientists working in the exciting field of vascular biology to publish their findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信