Shutong Zhou, Qun Wang, Tianyu Tang, Meizhu Cao, Yan Tan, Kaixian Bai, Wenjun Liu
{"title":"基于logistic回归和恶性倾向综合评分的孤立肺模块恶性概率联合预测。","authors":"Shutong Zhou, Qun Wang, Tianyu Tang, Meizhu Cao, Yan Tan, Kaixian Bai, Wenjun Liu","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We analyzed the relationship between clinical data, tumor markers, chest high-resolution CT(HRCT) and pathology in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) and explored the joint discrimination scheme to improve the accuracy of noninvasive diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>242 SPNs with the largest diameter D<2cmwere divided into training set (161 cases) and test set (81 cases). We screened the risk factors by single factor analysis. Then, we established the prediction equation model (PE model) based on logistic regression and malignant tendency comprehensive score model (MTCS model) based on the evaluation criteria of SPN. The weight of the two sub models was used to determine the joint evaluation model (JE model).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, CEA content, maximum diameter, pleural adhesions, spicule sign, and ground glass component were independent factors of malignant prediction (p<0.05) recorded as x1~x6, and PE model was established as P1=ex/(1+ex),x=0.052x1+0.0327x2+0.212x3+1.849x4+ 1.066x5+1.769x6-7.582.According to the different performance of different manifestations of the corresponding score, we could get each score S of SPN. The MTCS model was S/8.5. The JE model was P=0.76P1+0.24S/8.5. The results of test set showed the AUC values of JE, PE, MTCS, Mayo, VA and Li Yun model for D≤2cm SPN were 0.930(95% CI:0.877-0.983), 0.922(95% CI:0.870-0.974), 0.900(95% CI:0.879-0.921), 0.782(95% CI:0.749-0.815), 0.744(95% CI:0.731-0.756) and 0.801(95% CI:0.739-0.863). The sensitivity of JE, PE, MTCS model were 87.2%, 79.2%, 73.3%, the specificity was 90.1%, 89.2%, 82.2%, and the accuracy was 89.9%, 85.5%, 81.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The joint evaluation model has better diagnostic efficiency and can provide reference for the diagnosis of SPN with D≤2cm.</p>","PeriodicalId":50248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Buon","volume":" ","pages":"1815-1823"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Joint prediction of solitary pulmonary module malignant probability based on logistic regression and malignant tendency comprehensive score.\",\"authors\":\"Shutong Zhou, Qun Wang, Tianyu Tang, Meizhu Cao, Yan Tan, Kaixian Bai, Wenjun Liu\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We analyzed the relationship between clinical data, tumor markers, chest high-resolution CT(HRCT) and pathology in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) and explored the joint discrimination scheme to improve the accuracy of noninvasive diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>242 SPNs with the largest diameter D<2cmwere divided into training set (161 cases) and test set (81 cases). We screened the risk factors by single factor analysis. Then, we established the prediction equation model (PE model) based on logistic regression and malignant tendency comprehensive score model (MTCS model) based on the evaluation criteria of SPN. The weight of the two sub models was used to determine the joint evaluation model (JE model).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Age, CEA content, maximum diameter, pleural adhesions, spicule sign, and ground glass component were independent factors of malignant prediction (p<0.05) recorded as x1~x6, and PE model was established as P1=ex/(1+ex),x=0.052x1+0.0327x2+0.212x3+1.849x4+ 1.066x5+1.769x6-7.582.According to the different performance of different manifestations of the corresponding score, we could get each score S of SPN. The MTCS model was S/8.5. The JE model was P=0.76P1+0.24S/8.5. The results of test set showed the AUC values of JE, PE, MTCS, Mayo, VA and Li Yun model for D≤2cm SPN were 0.930(95% CI:0.877-0.983), 0.922(95% CI:0.870-0.974), 0.900(95% CI:0.879-0.921), 0.782(95% CI:0.749-0.815), 0.744(95% CI:0.731-0.756) and 0.801(95% CI:0.739-0.863). The sensitivity of JE, PE, MTCS model were 87.2%, 79.2%, 73.3%, the specificity was 90.1%, 89.2%, 82.2%, and the accuracy was 89.9%, 85.5%, 81.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The joint evaluation model has better diagnostic efficiency and can provide reference for the diagnosis of SPN with D≤2cm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Buon\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1815-1823\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Buon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Buon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Joint prediction of solitary pulmonary module malignant probability based on logistic regression and malignant tendency comprehensive score.
Purpose: We analyzed the relationship between clinical data, tumor markers, chest high-resolution CT(HRCT) and pathology in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) and explored the joint discrimination scheme to improve the accuracy of noninvasive diagnosis.
Methods: 242 SPNs with the largest diameter D<2cmwere divided into training set (161 cases) and test set (81 cases). We screened the risk factors by single factor analysis. Then, we established the prediction equation model (PE model) based on logistic regression and malignant tendency comprehensive score model (MTCS model) based on the evaluation criteria of SPN. The weight of the two sub models was used to determine the joint evaluation model (JE model).
Results: Age, CEA content, maximum diameter, pleural adhesions, spicule sign, and ground glass component were independent factors of malignant prediction (p<0.05) recorded as x1~x6, and PE model was established as P1=ex/(1+ex),x=0.052x1+0.0327x2+0.212x3+1.849x4+ 1.066x5+1.769x6-7.582.According to the different performance of different manifestations of the corresponding score, we could get each score S of SPN. The MTCS model was S/8.5. The JE model was P=0.76P1+0.24S/8.5. The results of test set showed the AUC values of JE, PE, MTCS, Mayo, VA and Li Yun model for D≤2cm SPN were 0.930(95% CI:0.877-0.983), 0.922(95% CI:0.870-0.974), 0.900(95% CI:0.879-0.921), 0.782(95% CI:0.749-0.815), 0.744(95% CI:0.731-0.756) and 0.801(95% CI:0.739-0.863). The sensitivity of JE, PE, MTCS model were 87.2%, 79.2%, 73.3%, the specificity was 90.1%, 89.2%, 82.2%, and the accuracy was 89.9%, 85.5%, 81.2%.
Conclusions: The joint evaluation model has better diagnostic efficiency and can provide reference for the diagnosis of SPN with D≤2cm.
期刊介绍:
JBUON aims at the rapid diffusion of scientific knowledge in Oncology.
Its character is multidisciplinary, therefore all aspects of oncologic activities are welcome including clinical research (medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, nursing oncology, psycho-oncology, supportive care), as well as clinically-oriented basic and laboratory research, cancer epidemiology and social and ethical aspects of cancer. Experts of all these disciplines are included in the Editorial Board.
With a rapidly increasing body of new discoveries in clinical therapeutics, the molecular mechanisms that contribute to carcinogenesis, advancements in accurate and early diagnosis etc, JBUON offers a free forum for clinicians and basic researchers to make known promptly their achievements around the world.
With this aim JBUON accepts a broad spectrum of articles such as editorials, original articles, reviews, special articles, short communications, commentaries, letters to the editor and correspondence among authors and readers.
JBUON keeps the characteristics of its former paper print edition and appears as a bimonthly e-published journal with continuous volume, issue and page numbers.