重新配置粮食系统治理:联合国粮食安全体系和权力与合法性之争。

Matthew C Canfield, Jessica Duncan, Priscilla Claeys
{"title":"重新配置粮食系统治理:联合国粮食安全体系和权力与合法性之争。","authors":"Matthew C Canfield,&nbsp;Jessica Duncan,&nbsp;Priscilla Claeys","doi":"10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The UN Food Systems Summit was an ambitious and hotly contested event that brought competing approaches to global food governance into relief. In this article, we unpack the rival visions that circulate around how food systems should be governed, focusing on two issues that we feel are at the heart of these divergences: authority and legitimacy. We illustrate how both corporate-philanthropic and food sovereignty networks are struggling to establish epistemic authority of food systems as well as produce legitimacy through very different approaches to participation and accountability.</p>","PeriodicalId":72792,"journal":{"name":"Development (Society for International Development)","volume":"64 3-4","pages":"181-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513380/pdf/","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconfiguring Food Systems Governance: The UNFSS and the Battle Over Authority and Legitimacy.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C Canfield,&nbsp;Jessica Duncan,&nbsp;Priscilla Claeys\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The UN Food Systems Summit was an ambitious and hotly contested event that brought competing approaches to global food governance into relief. In this article, we unpack the rival visions that circulate around how food systems should be governed, focusing on two issues that we feel are at the heart of these divergences: authority and legitimacy. We illustrate how both corporate-philanthropic and food sovereignty networks are struggling to establish epistemic authority of food systems as well as produce legitimacy through very different approaches to participation and accountability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development (Society for International Development)\",\"volume\":\"64 3-4\",\"pages\":\"181-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8513380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development (Society for International Development)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development (Society for International Development)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-021-00312-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

联合国粮食系统首脑会议是一项雄心勃勃且竞争激烈的活动,它使全球粮食治理的相互竞争的方法得到了缓解。在这篇文章中,我们剖析了围绕如何管理粮食系统的对立观点,重点关注我们认为处于这些分歧核心的两个问题:权威和合法性。我们说明了企业慈善和粮食主权网络如何努力建立粮食系统的认识权威,并通过非常不同的参与和问责制方法产生合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconfiguring Food Systems Governance: The UNFSS and the Battle Over Authority and Legitimacy.

The UN Food Systems Summit was an ambitious and hotly contested event that brought competing approaches to global food governance into relief. In this article, we unpack the rival visions that circulate around how food systems should be governed, focusing on two issues that we feel are at the heart of these divergences: authority and legitimacy. We illustrate how both corporate-philanthropic and food sovereignty networks are struggling to establish epistemic authority of food systems as well as produce legitimacy through very different approaches to participation and accountability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信