患者对替代决策的优先级:错误信念的可能影响。

Q1 Arts and Humanities
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2021.1983665
E J Jardas, Robert Wesley, Mark Pavlick, David Wendler, Annette Rid
{"title":"患者对替代决策的优先级:错误信念的可能影响。","authors":"E J Jardas,&nbsp;Robert Wesley,&nbsp;Mark Pavlick,&nbsp;David Wendler,&nbsp;Annette Rid","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2021.1983665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients have three primary goals for how treatment decisions are made for them in the event of decisional incapacity. They want to be treated consistent with their preferences and values, they want their family to be involved in making decisions, and they want to minimize the stress on their family. The present paper investigates how patients' beliefs about surrogate decision-making influence which of these three goals they prioritize. <b>Methods:</b> Quantitative survey of 1,169 U.S. patients to assess their beliefs about surrogate decision-making, and how these beliefs influence patients' priorities for surrogate decision-making. <b>Results:</b> Most patients believed that families in general (68.8%) and their own family in particular (83.4%) frequently, almost always, or always know which treatments the patient would want in the event of incapacity. Patients with these beliefs were more likely to prioritize the goal of involving their family in treatment decision-making over the goal of minimizing family stress. Most patients (77.4%) also believed their family would experience significant stress from helping to make treatment decisions. However, patients' priorities were largely unchanged by this belief. <b>Conclusions:</b> Prior reports suggest that patients overestimate the extent to which their family knows which treatments they want in the event of decisional incapacity. The present analysis adds that these patients might be more likely to prioritize the goal of involving their family in treatment decision-making, even when this results in the family experiencing significant distress. This finding highlights that patients' misinformed beliefs about their family's knowledge might influence patients' priorities for surrogate decision-making, raising important questions for clinical practice, policy, and future research.</p><p><p>Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1983665.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"137-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' Priorities for Surrogate Decision-Making: Possible Influence of Misinformed Beliefs.\",\"authors\":\"E J Jardas,&nbsp;Robert Wesley,&nbsp;Mark Pavlick,&nbsp;David Wendler,&nbsp;Annette Rid\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23294515.2021.1983665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients have three primary goals for how treatment decisions are made for them in the event of decisional incapacity. They want to be treated consistent with their preferences and values, they want their family to be involved in making decisions, and they want to minimize the stress on their family. The present paper investigates how patients' beliefs about surrogate decision-making influence which of these three goals they prioritize. <b>Methods:</b> Quantitative survey of 1,169 U.S. patients to assess their beliefs about surrogate decision-making, and how these beliefs influence patients' priorities for surrogate decision-making. <b>Results:</b> Most patients believed that families in general (68.8%) and their own family in particular (83.4%) frequently, almost always, or always know which treatments the patient would want in the event of incapacity. Patients with these beliefs were more likely to prioritize the goal of involving their family in treatment decision-making over the goal of minimizing family stress. Most patients (77.4%) also believed their family would experience significant stress from helping to make treatment decisions. However, patients' priorities were largely unchanged by this belief. <b>Conclusions:</b> Prior reports suggest that patients overestimate the extent to which their family knows which treatments they want in the event of decisional incapacity. The present analysis adds that these patients might be more likely to prioritize the goal of involving their family in treatment decision-making, even when this results in the family experiencing significant distress. This finding highlights that patients' misinformed beliefs about their family's knowledge might influence patients' priorities for surrogate decision-making, raising important questions for clinical practice, policy, and future research.</p><p><p>Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1983665.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB Empirical Bioethics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"137-151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB Empirical Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1983665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1983665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:许多患者在丧失决策能力的情况下如何为他们做出治疗决定有三个主要目标。他们希望得到与他们的偏好和价值观一致的待遇,他们希望家人参与决策,他们希望将家庭的压力降到最低。本文探讨了患者对替代决策的信念如何影响他们优先考虑这三个目标中的哪一个。方法:对1169名美国人进行定量调查患者评估他们对替代决策的信念,以及这些信念如何影响患者对替代决策的优先级。结果:大多数患者认为一般家庭(68.8%)和自己的家庭(83.4%)经常、几乎总是或总是知道患者在丧失行为能力时需要哪种治疗方法。有这些信念的患者更有可能优先考虑让家人参与治疗决策的目标,而不是减少家庭压力的目标。大多数患者(77.4%)还认为,他们的家人会因为帮助做出治疗决定而承受巨大的压力。然而,患者的优先级在很大程度上没有受到这种信念的影响。结论:先前的报告表明,患者高估了他们的家人知道的程度,他们想要的治疗在决定丧失能力的情况下。目前的分析补充说,这些患者可能更有可能优先考虑让家人参与治疗决策的目标,即使这导致家庭经历重大痛苦。这一发现强调,患者对其家庭知识的错误信念可能会影响患者对代孕决策的优先级,这为临床实践、政策和未来的研究提出了重要问题。本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1983665上在线获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' Priorities for Surrogate Decision-Making: Possible Influence of Misinformed Beliefs.

Background: Many patients have three primary goals for how treatment decisions are made for them in the event of decisional incapacity. They want to be treated consistent with their preferences and values, they want their family to be involved in making decisions, and they want to minimize the stress on their family. The present paper investigates how patients' beliefs about surrogate decision-making influence which of these three goals they prioritize. Methods: Quantitative survey of 1,169 U.S. patients to assess their beliefs about surrogate decision-making, and how these beliefs influence patients' priorities for surrogate decision-making. Results: Most patients believed that families in general (68.8%) and their own family in particular (83.4%) frequently, almost always, or always know which treatments the patient would want in the event of incapacity. Patients with these beliefs were more likely to prioritize the goal of involving their family in treatment decision-making over the goal of minimizing family stress. Most patients (77.4%) also believed their family would experience significant stress from helping to make treatment decisions. However, patients' priorities were largely unchanged by this belief. Conclusions: Prior reports suggest that patients overestimate the extent to which their family knows which treatments they want in the event of decisional incapacity. The present analysis adds that these patients might be more likely to prioritize the goal of involving their family in treatment decision-making, even when this results in the family experiencing significant distress. This finding highlights that patients' misinformed beliefs about their family's knowledge might influence patients' priorities for surrogate decision-making, raising important questions for clinical practice, policy, and future research.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1983665.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信