RAADS-R 作为成人 ASD 群体筛查工具的有效性。

Autism Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2021-09-11 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/9974791
Sarah L Jones, Maria Johnson, Bronwen Alty, Marios Adamou
{"title":"RAADS-R 作为成人 ASD 群体筛查工具的有效性。","authors":"Sarah L Jones, Maria Johnson, Bronwen Alty, Marios Adamou","doi":"10.1155/2021/9974791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adult referrals to specialist autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services have increased in recent years, placing strain on existing services. It was proposed that the Ritvo Autism Asperger's Diagnostic Scale could be used as a screening tool, in order to identify and prioritise patients most likely to receive an ASD diagnosis. This study evaluates the validity of the RAADS-R as a screening tool for ASD in an adult population. Retrospective case note analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of the RAADS-R as a screening tool to predict ASD diagnostic outcomes in 50 service users of a NHS specialist autism service. Results indicate no association between RAADS-R scores and clinical diagnostic outcome, suggesting the RAADS-R is not an effective screening tool for identifying service users most likely to receive an ASD diagnosis. In conclusion, used as a self-report measure pre-full diagnostic assessment, the RAADS-R lacks predictive validity and is not a suitable screening tool for adults awaiting autism assessments. Future research should aim to identify reliable screening tools for this purpose.</p>","PeriodicalId":8659,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research and Treatment","volume":"2021 ","pages":"9974791"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of RAADS-R as a Screening Tool for Adult ASD Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah L Jones, Maria Johnson, Bronwen Alty, Marios Adamou\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/9974791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adult referrals to specialist autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services have increased in recent years, placing strain on existing services. It was proposed that the Ritvo Autism Asperger's Diagnostic Scale could be used as a screening tool, in order to identify and prioritise patients most likely to receive an ASD diagnosis. This study evaluates the validity of the RAADS-R as a screening tool for ASD in an adult population. Retrospective case note analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of the RAADS-R as a screening tool to predict ASD diagnostic outcomes in 50 service users of a NHS specialist autism service. Results indicate no association between RAADS-R scores and clinical diagnostic outcome, suggesting the RAADS-R is not an effective screening tool for identifying service users most likely to receive an ASD diagnosis. In conclusion, used as a self-report measure pre-full diagnostic assessment, the RAADS-R lacks predictive validity and is not a suitable screening tool for adults awaiting autism assessments. Future research should aim to identify reliable screening tools for this purpose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"9974791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8452438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9974791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9974791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,转诊到自闭症谱系障碍专科诊断服务的成人人数不断增加,给现有服务带来了压力。有研究建议将 Ritvo 自闭症阿斯伯格诊断量表用作筛查工具,以识别最有可能接受自闭症谱系障碍诊断的患者并对其进行优先排序。本研究评估了 RAADS-R 作为成人自闭症筛查工具的有效性。研究采用回顾性病例分析法,评估 RAADS-R 作为筛查工具的有效性,以预测国家医疗服务系统(NHS)自闭症专科服务的 50 名服务使用者的 ASD 诊断结果。结果表明,RAADS-R 分数与临床诊断结果之间没有关联,这表明 RAADS-R 并不是一种有效的筛查工具,无法识别最有可能被诊断为 ASD 的服务使用者。总之,作为全面诊断评估前的自我报告测量方法,RAADS-R 缺乏预测有效性,不适合作为等待自闭症评估的成年人的筛查工具。未来的研究应着眼于为这一目的确定可靠的筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effectiveness of RAADS-R as a Screening Tool for Adult ASD Populations.

The Effectiveness of RAADS-R as a Screening Tool for Adult ASD Populations.

Adult referrals to specialist autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services have increased in recent years, placing strain on existing services. It was proposed that the Ritvo Autism Asperger's Diagnostic Scale could be used as a screening tool, in order to identify and prioritise patients most likely to receive an ASD diagnosis. This study evaluates the validity of the RAADS-R as a screening tool for ASD in an adult population. Retrospective case note analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of the RAADS-R as a screening tool to predict ASD diagnostic outcomes in 50 service users of a NHS specialist autism service. Results indicate no association between RAADS-R scores and clinical diagnostic outcome, suggesting the RAADS-R is not an effective screening tool for identifying service users most likely to receive an ASD diagnosis. In conclusion, used as a self-report measure pre-full diagnostic assessment, the RAADS-R lacks predictive validity and is not a suitable screening tool for adults awaiting autism assessments. Future research should aim to identify reliable screening tools for this purpose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信