Tafadzwa Dzinamarira, Munyaradzi P Mapingure, Gallican N Rwibasira, Solomon Mukwenha, Godfrey Musuka
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病:卢旺达、南非和津巴布韦应对措施的比较","authors":"Tafadzwa Dzinamarira, Munyaradzi P Mapingure, Gallican N Rwibasira, Solomon Mukwenha, Godfrey Musuka","doi":"10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact worldwide with regions experiencing varying degrees of severity. African countries have mounted different response strategies eliciting varied outcomes. Here, we compare these response strategies in Rwanda, South Africa and Zimbabwe and discuss lessons that could be shared. In particular, Rwanda has a robust and coordinated national health system that has effectively contained the epidemic. South Africa has considerable testing capacity, which has been used productively in a national response largely funded by local resources but affected negatively by corruption. Zimbabwe has an effective point-of-entry approach that utilizes an innovative strategic information system. All three countries would benefit having routine meetings to share experiences and lessons learned during the COVD-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49835,"journal":{"name":"Medicc Review","volume":" ","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19: Comparison of the Response in Rwanda, South Africa and Zimbabwe.\",\"authors\":\"Tafadzwa Dzinamarira, Munyaradzi P Mapingure, Gallican N Rwibasira, Solomon Mukwenha, Godfrey Musuka\",\"doi\":\"10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact worldwide with regions experiencing varying degrees of severity. African countries have mounted different response strategies eliciting varied outcomes. Here, we compare these response strategies in Rwanda, South Africa and Zimbabwe and discuss lessons that could be shared. In particular, Rwanda has a robust and coordinated national health system that has effectively contained the epidemic. South Africa has considerable testing capacity, which has been used productively in a national response largely funded by local resources but affected negatively by corruption. Zimbabwe has an effective point-of-entry approach that utilizes an innovative strategic information system. All three countries would benefit having routine meetings to share experiences and lessons learned during the COVD-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicc Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicc Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicc Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37757/MR2021.V23.N3.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
COVID-19: Comparison of the Response in Rwanda, South Africa and Zimbabwe.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact worldwide with regions experiencing varying degrees of severity. African countries have mounted different response strategies eliciting varied outcomes. Here, we compare these response strategies in Rwanda, South Africa and Zimbabwe and discuss lessons that could be shared. In particular, Rwanda has a robust and coordinated national health system that has effectively contained the epidemic. South Africa has considerable testing capacity, which has been used productively in a national response largely funded by local resources but affected negatively by corruption. Zimbabwe has an effective point-of-entry approach that utilizes an innovative strategic information system. All three countries would benefit having routine meetings to share experiences and lessons learned during the COVD-19 pandemic.
期刊介绍:
Uphold the highest standards of ethics and excellence, publishing open-access articles in English relevant to global health equity that offer the best of medical, population health and social sciences research and perspectives by Cuban and other developing-country professionals.