[效应量分析的统计方法]。

Q3 Medicine
Mario Enrique Rendón-Macías, Irma Susana Zarco-Villavicencio, Miguel Ángel Villasís-Keever
{"title":"[效应量分析的统计方法]。","authors":"Mario Enrique Rendón-Macías,&nbsp;Irma Susana Zarco-Villavicencio,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Villasís-Keever","doi":"10.29262/ram.v658i2.949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Informing in the studies about the effect size of an intervention or the impact of the factor(s) about an outcome, allows better decision-making for the application of the results in clinical practice. This article presents different methods to analyze the effect size, which can be through direct or indirect statistical methods. Within the direct methods, there's the difference in means between groups and the difference of absolute or relative frequencies. Among the indirect methods, Cohen's \"d\" family (which are based on standard deviation values), the \"r and R2\" family, measures of association (e.g. OR, RR, HR), and impact measures (e.g. NNT) are shown. The decision to use any of these methods depends on the objectives of the study and the measuring scale that is used to assess the results, as well as the data distribution. In order to enhance the understanding of the methods described in this article, examples are included, and the need to include level of precision (e.g. confidence intervals) is highlighted, along with the clinical decision thresholds for a better interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21175,"journal":{"name":"Revista alergia Mexico","volume":"68 2","pages":"128-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Statistical methods for effect size analysis].\",\"authors\":\"Mario Enrique Rendón-Macías,&nbsp;Irma Susana Zarco-Villavicencio,&nbsp;Miguel Ángel Villasís-Keever\",\"doi\":\"10.29262/ram.v658i2.949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Informing in the studies about the effect size of an intervention or the impact of the factor(s) about an outcome, allows better decision-making for the application of the results in clinical practice. This article presents different methods to analyze the effect size, which can be through direct or indirect statistical methods. Within the direct methods, there's the difference in means between groups and the difference of absolute or relative frequencies. Among the indirect methods, Cohen's \\\"d\\\" family (which are based on standard deviation values), the \\\"r and R2\\\" family, measures of association (e.g. OR, RR, HR), and impact measures (e.g. NNT) are shown. The decision to use any of these methods depends on the objectives of the study and the measuring scale that is used to assess the results, as well as the data distribution. In order to enhance the understanding of the methods described in this article, examples are included, and the need to include level of precision (e.g. confidence intervals) is highlighted, along with the clinical decision thresholds for a better interpretation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista alergia Mexico\",\"volume\":\"68 2\",\"pages\":\"128-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista alergia Mexico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v658i2.949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista alergia Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29262/ram.v658i2.949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在研究中告知干预措施的效果大小或因素对结果的影响,可以更好地决策结果在临床实践中的应用。本文提出了不同的分析效应大小的方法,可以通过直接或间接的统计方法。在直接法中,有组间均值的差异以及绝对频率或相对频率的差异。在间接方法中,显示了Cohen的“d”族(基于标准差值)、“r和R2”族、关联度量(如OR、RR、HR)和影响度量(如NNT)。决定使用这些方法中的任何一种取决于研究的目标和用于评估结果的测量尺度,以及数据分布。为了加强对本文中描述的方法的理解,包括示例,并强调需要包括精度水平(例如置信区间),以及临床决策阈值,以便更好地解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Statistical methods for effect size analysis].

Informing in the studies about the effect size of an intervention or the impact of the factor(s) about an outcome, allows better decision-making for the application of the results in clinical practice. This article presents different methods to analyze the effect size, which can be through direct or indirect statistical methods. Within the direct methods, there's the difference in means between groups and the difference of absolute or relative frequencies. Among the indirect methods, Cohen's "d" family (which are based on standard deviation values), the "r and R2" family, measures of association (e.g. OR, RR, HR), and impact measures (e.g. NNT) are shown. The decision to use any of these methods depends on the objectives of the study and the measuring scale that is used to assess the results, as well as the data distribution. In order to enhance the understanding of the methods described in this article, examples are included, and the need to include level of precision (e.g. confidence intervals) is highlighted, along with the clinical decision thresholds for a better interpretation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista alergia Mexico
Revista alergia Mexico Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信