偏离临床常规可以揭示设备设计漏洞的来源。

Q4 Medicine
Rotem Naftalovich, Andrew J Iskander, Faraz Chaudhry, Steven Char, Jean Daniel Eloy
{"title":"偏离临床常规可以揭示设备设计漏洞的来源。","authors":"Rotem Naftalovich,&nbsp;Andrew J Iskander,&nbsp;Faraz Chaudhry,&nbsp;Steven Char,&nbsp;Jean Daniel Eloy","doi":"10.2345/0899-8205-55.3.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to adequately ventilate a patient is critical and sometimes a challenge in the emergency, intensive care, and anesthesiology settings. Commonly, initial ventilation is achieved through the use of a face mask in conjunction with a bag that is manually squeezed by the clinician to generate positive pressure and flow of air or oxygen through the patient's airway. Large or small erroneous openings in the breathing circuit can lead to leaks that compromise ventilation ability. Standard procedure in anesthesiology is to check the circuit apparatus and oxygen delivery system prior to every case. Because the face mask itself is not a piece of equipment that is associated with a source of leak, some common anesthesia machine designs are constructed such that the circuit is tested without the mask component. We present an example of a leak that resulted from complete failure of the face mask due to a tiny tear in its cuff by the patient's sharp teeth edges. This subsequently prevented formation of a seal between the face mask and the patient's face and rendered the device incapable of generating the positive pressure it is designed to deliver. This instance depicts the broader lesson that deviation from clinical routines can reveal unappreciated sources of vulnerability in device design.</p>","PeriodicalId":35656,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8657845/pdf/i0899-8205-55-3-100.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deviation from Clinical Routines Can Reveal Sources of Device Design Vulnerability.\",\"authors\":\"Rotem Naftalovich,&nbsp;Andrew J Iskander,&nbsp;Faraz Chaudhry,&nbsp;Steven Char,&nbsp;Jean Daniel Eloy\",\"doi\":\"10.2345/0899-8205-55.3.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability to adequately ventilate a patient is critical and sometimes a challenge in the emergency, intensive care, and anesthesiology settings. Commonly, initial ventilation is achieved through the use of a face mask in conjunction with a bag that is manually squeezed by the clinician to generate positive pressure and flow of air or oxygen through the patient's airway. Large or small erroneous openings in the breathing circuit can lead to leaks that compromise ventilation ability. Standard procedure in anesthesiology is to check the circuit apparatus and oxygen delivery system prior to every case. Because the face mask itself is not a piece of equipment that is associated with a source of leak, some common anesthesia machine designs are constructed such that the circuit is tested without the mask component. We present an example of a leak that resulted from complete failure of the face mask due to a tiny tear in its cuff by the patient's sharp teeth edges. This subsequently prevented formation of a seal between the face mask and the patient's face and rendered the device incapable of generating the positive pressure it is designed to deliver. This instance depicts the broader lesson that deviation from clinical routines can reveal unappreciated sources of vulnerability in device design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8657845/pdf/i0899-8205-55-3-100.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-55.3.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-55.3.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在急诊、重症监护和麻醉科环境中,给病人充分通气的能力是至关重要的,有时也是一项挑战。通常,初始通气是通过使用口罩和一个由临床医生手动挤压的袋子来实现的,以产生正压,并通过患者的气道产生空气或氧气的流动。呼吸回路中或大或小的错误开口都会导致泄漏,从而损害通气能力。麻醉学的标准程序是在每个病例之前检查电路设备和供氧系统。由于口罩本身不是一个与泄漏源相关的设备,一些常见的麻醉机设计使得电路在没有口罩组件的情况下进行测试。我们提出了一个泄漏的例子,导致完全失败的口罩,由于一个微小的撕裂在其袖口的病人的锋利的牙齿边缘。这随后阻止了口罩和患者面部之间形成密封,并使设备无法产生其设计提供的正压。这个例子描绘了一个更广泛的教训,即偏离临床常规可能会暴露出设备设计中未被重视的漏洞来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Deviation from Clinical Routines Can Reveal Sources of Device Design Vulnerability.

Deviation from Clinical Routines Can Reveal Sources of Device Design Vulnerability.

Deviation from Clinical Routines Can Reveal Sources of Device Design Vulnerability.

The ability to adequately ventilate a patient is critical and sometimes a challenge in the emergency, intensive care, and anesthesiology settings. Commonly, initial ventilation is achieved through the use of a face mask in conjunction with a bag that is manually squeezed by the clinician to generate positive pressure and flow of air or oxygen through the patient's airway. Large or small erroneous openings in the breathing circuit can lead to leaks that compromise ventilation ability. Standard procedure in anesthesiology is to check the circuit apparatus and oxygen delivery system prior to every case. Because the face mask itself is not a piece of equipment that is associated with a source of leak, some common anesthesia machine designs are constructed such that the circuit is tested without the mask component. We present an example of a leak that resulted from complete failure of the face mask due to a tiny tear in its cuff by the patient's sharp teeth edges. This subsequently prevented formation of a seal between the face mask and the patient's face and rendered the device incapable of generating the positive pressure it is designed to deliver. This instance depicts the broader lesson that deviation from clinical routines can reveal unappreciated sources of vulnerability in device design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology
Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: AAMI publishes Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology (BI&T) a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the developers, managers, and users of medical instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信