评估髋关节置换术患者职业治疗的最佳证据:指南。

IF 0.4 Q3 Medicine
Giovanni Galeoto, Marta Addolorato, Sabrina Porco, Federico Tancioni, Marco Gagliardi, Giovanni Fabbrini, Marco Tofani, Julita Sansoni, Roberta Mollica, Anna Berardi, Rita De Santis
{"title":"评估髋关节置换术患者职业治疗的最佳证据:指南。","authors":"Giovanni Galeoto,&nbsp;Marta Addolorato,&nbsp;Sabrina Porco,&nbsp;Federico Tancioni,&nbsp;Marco Gagliardi,&nbsp;Giovanni Fabbrini,&nbsp;Marco Tofani,&nbsp;Julita Sansoni,&nbsp;Roberta Mollica,&nbsp;Anna Berardi,&nbsp;Rita De Santis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Object. The following study was carried out in order to evaluate through guidelines the best evidence in occupational therapy for daily activities and quality of life of patients with hip prostheses. Methods. Recommendations were generated following the grading method of the National Program for Guidelines/National System Guidelines (PNLG-SNLG), a system for developing guidelines for recommendations in clinical practice. The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) tool was also applied. Results. A total of seven studies were included in this research: one randomized controlled trial, two systematic reviews, two outcomes research studies, and two observational studies. We found that, for the three clinical questions we proposed, more research on the effectiveness of treatments is required. Conclusions. The evidence resulting from this study is not sufficient to determine whether the rehabilitation techniques under consideration are effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":12674,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","volume":"43 2","pages":"144-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating best evidence in occupational therapy for patients with hip replacement: guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Galeoto,&nbsp;Marta Addolorato,&nbsp;Sabrina Porco,&nbsp;Federico Tancioni,&nbsp;Marco Gagliardi,&nbsp;Giovanni Fabbrini,&nbsp;Marco Tofani,&nbsp;Julita Sansoni,&nbsp;Roberta Mollica,&nbsp;Anna Berardi,&nbsp;Rita De Santis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Object. The following study was carried out in order to evaluate through guidelines the best evidence in occupational therapy for daily activities and quality of life of patients with hip prostheses. Methods. Recommendations were generated following the grading method of the National Program for Guidelines/National System Guidelines (PNLG-SNLG), a system for developing guidelines for recommendations in clinical practice. The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) tool was also applied. Results. A total of seven studies were included in this research: one randomized controlled trial, two systematic reviews, two outcomes research studies, and two observational studies. We found that, for the three clinical questions we proposed, more research on the effectiveness of treatments is required. Conclusions. The evidence resulting from this study is not sufficient to determine whether the rehabilitation techniques under consideration are effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia\",\"volume\":\"43 2\",\"pages\":\"144-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对象。下面的研究是为了通过指南来评估职业治疗对髋关节假体患者日常活动和生活质量的最佳证据。方法。建议是根据国家指南计划/国家系统指南(PNLG-SNLG)的分级方法生成的,PNLG-SNLG是一个为临床实践中的建议制定指南的系统。还应用了欧洲指南研究和评估评估(AGREE)工具。结果。本研究共纳入7项研究:1项随机对照试验、2项系统综述、2项结局研究和2项观察性研究。我们发现,对于我们提出的三个临床问题,需要对治疗的有效性进行更多的研究。结论。本研究得出的证据不足以确定所考虑的康复技术是否有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating best evidence in occupational therapy for patients with hip replacement: guidelines.

Summary: Object. The following study was carried out in order to evaluate through guidelines the best evidence in occupational therapy for daily activities and quality of life of patients with hip prostheses. Methods. Recommendations were generated following the grading method of the National Program for Guidelines/National System Guidelines (PNLG-SNLG), a system for developing guidelines for recommendations in clinical practice. The Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) tool was also applied. Results. A total of seven studies were included in this research: one randomized controlled trial, two systematic reviews, two outcomes research studies, and two observational studies. We found that, for the three clinical questions we proposed, more research on the effectiveness of treatments is required. Conclusions. The evidence resulting from this study is not sufficient to determine whether the rehabilitation techniques under consideration are effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信