生态系统服务和保护区的正义:意大利Circeo国家公园的案例。

IF 3.5 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England) Pub Date : 2021-07-21 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155
Stefania Benetti, Johannes Langemeyer
{"title":"生态系统服务和保护区的正义:意大利Circeo国家公园的案例。","authors":"Stefania Benetti,&nbsp;Johannes Langemeyer","doi":"10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Protected areas are key instruments for conserving biodiversity and landscapes. Yet, conservation initiatives are still often struggling to accommodate people's needs, provoking conflicts, and lacking support from local communities. Our study combines environmental justice and ecosystem services approaches to provide a critical understanding of trade-offs between people's interests and conservation goals in the case study of <i>Circeo National Park</i> (Italy). Applying a qualitative content analysis of different materials and using a survey of local residents, we focus on three main objectives: analysing the implementation of the ecosystem services framework in policy documents and exploring how different people value benefits from nature; investigating the decision-making process in terms of participation, information and communication strategies; and identifying how conservation policies generated different allocations of benefits, burdens and inequalities among social groups. The integrated approach applied in our study highlights ways to systematically uncover perceived injustices and identifies potential conflict lines. In the long run, this approach might help to increase the public acceptance of protected areas by fostering sustainability also in its often-overlooked social dimension.</p>","PeriodicalId":72869,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315210/pdf/","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas: the case of Circeo National Park, Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Stefania Benetti,&nbsp;Johannes Langemeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Protected areas are key instruments for conserving biodiversity and landscapes. Yet, conservation initiatives are still often struggling to accommodate people's needs, provoking conflicts, and lacking support from local communities. Our study combines environmental justice and ecosystem services approaches to provide a critical understanding of trade-offs between people's interests and conservation goals in the case study of <i>Circeo National Park</i> (Italy). Applying a qualitative content analysis of different materials and using a survey of local residents, we focus on three main objectives: analysing the implementation of the ecosystem services framework in policy documents and exploring how different people value benefits from nature; investigating the decision-making process in terms of participation, information and communication strategies; and identifying how conservation policies generated different allocations of benefits, burdens and inequalities among social groups. The integrated approach applied in our study highlights ways to systematically uncover perceived injustices and identifies potential conflict lines. In the long run, this approach might help to increase the public acceptance of protected areas by fostering sustainability also in its often-overlooked social dimension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8315210/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1946155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

保护区是保护生物多样性和景观的重要工具。然而,保护倡议仍然经常难以满足人们的需求,引发冲突,缺乏当地社区的支持。我们的研究结合了环境正义和生态系统服务的方法,以意大利Circeo国家公园为例,对人们的利益和保护目标之间的权衡提供了批判性的理解。通过对不同材料的定性内容分析和对当地居民的调查,我们将重点放在三个主要目标上:分析政策文件中生态系统服务框架的实施情况,探索不同的人如何重视自然带来的利益;从参与、信息和传播战略的角度调查决策过程;并确定保护政策如何在社会群体中产生不同的利益分配、负担和不平等。在我们的研究中应用的综合方法强调了系统地揭示感知到的不公正和识别潜在冲突线的方法。从长远来看,这种方法可能有助于提高公众对保护区的接受度,因为它还在经常被忽视的社会层面上促进可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas: the case of Circeo National Park, Italy.

Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas: the case of Circeo National Park, Italy.

Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas: the case of Circeo National Park, Italy.

Ecosystem services and justice of protected areas: the case of Circeo National Park, Italy.

Protected areas are key instruments for conserving biodiversity and landscapes. Yet, conservation initiatives are still often struggling to accommodate people's needs, provoking conflicts, and lacking support from local communities. Our study combines environmental justice and ecosystem services approaches to provide a critical understanding of trade-offs between people's interests and conservation goals in the case study of Circeo National Park (Italy). Applying a qualitative content analysis of different materials and using a survey of local residents, we focus on three main objectives: analysing the implementation of the ecosystem services framework in policy documents and exploring how different people value benefits from nature; investigating the decision-making process in terms of participation, information and communication strategies; and identifying how conservation policies generated different allocations of benefits, burdens and inequalities among social groups. The integrated approach applied in our study highlights ways to systematically uncover perceived injustices and identifies potential conflict lines. In the long run, this approach might help to increase the public acceptance of protected areas by fostering sustainability also in its often-overlooked social dimension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信