神经伦理学和动物:宾夕法尼亚大学动物研究神经伦理学研讨会的报告和建议。

IF 3.1 3区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Ilar Journal Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI:10.1093/ilar/ilab024
Adam J Shriver, Tyler M John
{"title":"神经伦理学和动物:宾夕法尼亚大学动物研究神经伦理学研讨会的报告和建议。","authors":"Adam J Shriver,&nbsp;Tyler M John","doi":"10.1093/ilar/ilab024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing awareness of the ethical implications of neuroscience in the early years of the 21st century led to the emergence of the new academic field of \"neuroethics,\" which studies the ethical implications of developments in the neurosciences. However, despite the acceleration and evolution of neuroscience research on nonhuman animals, the unique ethical issues connected with neuroscience research involving nonhuman animals remain underdiscussed. This is a significant oversight given the central place of animal models in neuroscience. To respond to these concerns, the Center for Neuroscience and Society and the Center for the Interaction of Animals and Society at the University of Pennsylvania hosted a workshop on the \"Neuroethics of Animal Research\" in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. At the workshop, expert speakers and attendees discussed ethical issues arising from neuroscience research involving nonhuman animals, including the use of animal models in the study of pain and psychiatric conditions, animal brain-machine interfaces, animal-animal chimeras, cerebral organoids, and the relevance of neuroscience to debates about personhood. This paper highlights important emerging ethical issues based on the discussions at the workshop. This paper includes recommendations for research in the United States from the authors based on the discussions at the workshop, loosely following the format of the 2 Gray Matters reports on neuroethics published by the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":56299,"journal":{"name":"Ilar Journal","volume":"60 3","pages":"424-433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/3d/ilab024.PMC8767460.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroethics and Animals: Report and Recommendations From the University of Pennsylvania Animal Research Neuroethics Workshop.\",\"authors\":\"Adam J Shriver,&nbsp;Tyler M John\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ilar/ilab024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Growing awareness of the ethical implications of neuroscience in the early years of the 21st century led to the emergence of the new academic field of \\\"neuroethics,\\\" which studies the ethical implications of developments in the neurosciences. However, despite the acceleration and evolution of neuroscience research on nonhuman animals, the unique ethical issues connected with neuroscience research involving nonhuman animals remain underdiscussed. This is a significant oversight given the central place of animal models in neuroscience. To respond to these concerns, the Center for Neuroscience and Society and the Center for the Interaction of Animals and Society at the University of Pennsylvania hosted a workshop on the \\\"Neuroethics of Animal Research\\\" in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. At the workshop, expert speakers and attendees discussed ethical issues arising from neuroscience research involving nonhuman animals, including the use of animal models in the study of pain and psychiatric conditions, animal brain-machine interfaces, animal-animal chimeras, cerebral organoids, and the relevance of neuroscience to debates about personhood. This paper highlights important emerging ethical issues based on the discussions at the workshop. This paper includes recommendations for research in the United States from the authors based on the discussions at the workshop, loosely following the format of the 2 Gray Matters reports on neuroethics published by the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ilar Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"424-433\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e4/3d/ilab024.PMC8767460.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ilar Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilab024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ilar Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilab024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

21世纪初,人们对神经科学伦理影响的认识日益增强,导致了“神经伦理学”这一新的学术领域的出现,该领域研究神经科学发展的伦理影响。然而,尽管对非人类动物的神经科学研究加速发展,但与涉及非人类动物的神经科学研究相关的独特伦理问题仍未得到充分讨论。鉴于动物模型在神经科学中的核心地位,这是一个重大的疏忽。为了回应这些担忧,宾夕法尼亚大学神经科学与社会中心和动物与社会互动中心在宾夕法尼亚州费城举办了一次关于“动物研究的神经伦理学”的研讨会。在研讨会上,专家演讲者和与会者讨论了涉及非人类动物的神经科学研究引起的伦理问题,包括在研究疼痛和精神状况时使用动物模型,动物脑机接口,动物-动物嵌合体,脑类器官,以及神经科学与人格辩论的相关性。本文强调了基于研讨会讨论的重要的新兴伦理问题。这篇论文包含了作者基于研讨会讨论的对美国研究的建议,大致遵循了由生物伦理问题研究总统委员会出版的关于神经伦理学的2份灰色问题报告的格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuroethics and Animals: Report and Recommendations From the University of Pennsylvania Animal Research Neuroethics Workshop.

Growing awareness of the ethical implications of neuroscience in the early years of the 21st century led to the emergence of the new academic field of "neuroethics," which studies the ethical implications of developments in the neurosciences. However, despite the acceleration and evolution of neuroscience research on nonhuman animals, the unique ethical issues connected with neuroscience research involving nonhuman animals remain underdiscussed. This is a significant oversight given the central place of animal models in neuroscience. To respond to these concerns, the Center for Neuroscience and Society and the Center for the Interaction of Animals and Society at the University of Pennsylvania hosted a workshop on the "Neuroethics of Animal Research" in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. At the workshop, expert speakers and attendees discussed ethical issues arising from neuroscience research involving nonhuman animals, including the use of animal models in the study of pain and psychiatric conditions, animal brain-machine interfaces, animal-animal chimeras, cerebral organoids, and the relevance of neuroscience to debates about personhood. This paper highlights important emerging ethical issues based on the discussions at the workshop. This paper includes recommendations for research in the United States from the authors based on the discussions at the workshop, loosely following the format of the 2 Gray Matters reports on neuroethics published by the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ilar Journal
Ilar Journal 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
>18 weeks
期刊介绍: The ILAR Journal is the peer-reviewed, theme-oriented publication of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (ILAR), which provides timely information for all who study, use, care for, and oversee the use of animals in research. The journal publishes original articles that review research on animals either as direct subjects or as surrogates for humans. According to policy, any previously unpublished animal research reported in the ILAR Journal will have been conducted according to the scientific, technical, and humanely appropriate guidelines current at the time the research was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals or other guidance provided by taxonomically-oriented professional societies (e.g., American Society of Mammalogy) as referenced in the Guide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信