重新审视医学的内在道德观念。

IF 1.4 Q2 ETHICS
Christopher Chen-Wei Ng, Toni C Saad
{"title":"重新审视医学的内在道德观念。","authors":"Christopher Chen-Wei Ng,&nbsp;Toni C Saad","doi":"10.1080/20502877.2021.1959788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article considers the idea of medicine's internal morality as it is understood by its various proponents. Although the use of the phrase 'internal morality' in relation to medicine predates Edmund Pellegrino, he can be credited with cementing its place in the vocabulary of medical ethics. Yet, while 'internal morality' and its related terms are now readily recognizable, they are used to denote irreconcilable ideas. Our aims, therefore, are to, firstly, clarify and, secondly, evaluate the different uses of 'internal morality', showing that there is little agreement on its definition. Thirdly, we argue that the terminology relating to 'internal morality' requires substantial revision, and that the term itself should be jettisoned. Finally, we briefly set out our own account of how morality should be understood in relation to the practice of medicine along similar but clearer lines to Pellegrino.</p>","PeriodicalId":43760,"journal":{"name":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","volume":"27 3","pages":"230-244"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20502877.2021.1959788","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-Examining the idea of internal morality in medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Chen-Wei Ng,&nbsp;Toni C Saad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20502877.2021.1959788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article considers the idea of medicine's internal morality as it is understood by its various proponents. Although the use of the phrase 'internal morality' in relation to medicine predates Edmund Pellegrino, he can be credited with cementing its place in the vocabulary of medical ethics. Yet, while 'internal morality' and its related terms are now readily recognizable, they are used to denote irreconcilable ideas. Our aims, therefore, are to, firstly, clarify and, secondly, evaluate the different uses of 'internal morality', showing that there is little agreement on its definition. Thirdly, we argue that the terminology relating to 'internal morality' requires substantial revision, and that the term itself should be jettisoned. Finally, we briefly set out our own account of how morality should be understood in relation to the practice of medicine along similar but clearer lines to Pellegrino.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"230-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20502877.2021.1959788\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2021.1959788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2021.1959788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章考虑了医学内部道德的概念,因为它是由其各种支持者所理解的。尽管“内在道德”一词与医学相关的使用要早于埃德蒙·佩莱格里诺,但他在医学伦理学词汇中巩固了它的地位。然而,虽然“内在道德”及其相关术语现在很容易辨认,但它们被用来表示不可调和的思想。因此,我们的目标是,首先,澄清,其次,评估“内在道德”的不同用法,表明对其定义几乎没有一致意见。第三,我们认为与“内在道德”相关的术语需要进行实质性的修订,并且应该抛弃这个术语本身。最后,我们简要地阐述了我们自己的观点,即道德应该如何被理解为与医学实践有关,沿着与佩莱格里诺相似但更清晰的路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-Examining the idea of internal morality in medicine.

This article considers the idea of medicine's internal morality as it is understood by its various proponents. Although the use of the phrase 'internal morality' in relation to medicine predates Edmund Pellegrino, he can be credited with cementing its place in the vocabulary of medical ethics. Yet, while 'internal morality' and its related terms are now readily recognizable, they are used to denote irreconcilable ideas. Our aims, therefore, are to, firstly, clarify and, secondly, evaluate the different uses of 'internal morality', showing that there is little agreement on its definition. Thirdly, we argue that the terminology relating to 'internal morality' requires substantial revision, and that the term itself should be jettisoned. Finally, we briefly set out our own account of how morality should be understood in relation to the practice of medicine along similar but clearer lines to Pellegrino.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信