外固定治疗后患者报告的结果和生活质量:一项基于问卷的调查。

IF 1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Shuhei Ugaji, Hidenori Matsubara, Satoshi Kato, Yasuhisa Yoshida, Tomo Hamada, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
{"title":"外固定治疗后患者报告的结果和生活质量:一项基于问卷的调查。","authors":"Shuhei Ugaji, Hidenori Matsubara, Satoshi Kato, Yasuhisa Yoshida, Tomo Hamada, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background This survey aims to assess the satisfaction of patients who have had treatment using external fixation (EF). Materials and methods An original questionnaire and a Short Form 36 (SF-36) were distributed to 121 patients who underwent treatment using EF for deformity correction and lengthening between 2006 and 2016. A multivariate analysis was performed on the factors associated with satisfaction. Results Sixty patients returned a response. The average satisfaction score was 83.6 points. In the 5-point satisfaction survey, 43 of 60 patients (71.7%) responded “very satisfied” or “satisfied” and 27 patients (45.0%) responded “yes” to the question as to whether they would request EF treatment again if presenting with the original preoperative condition. In addition, the subjectively expressed tolerance for having an external fixator device on the limb was 92.1 days on average. A correlation was established with the ISOLS score. Conclusion The top three factors that determined subjective inconvenience with EF are pain, walking, and heaviness. Although EF treatment was stressful, the satisfaction scores were high. Furthermore, the satisfaction with EF treatment was improved by (1) pain control, (2) shortening the EF period, and (3) psychological support. How to cite this article Ugaji S, Matsubara H, Kato S, et al. Patient-reported Outcome and Quality of Life after Treatment with External Fixation: A Questionnaire-based Survey. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(1):27–31.","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"16 1","pages":"27-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/0e/stlr-16-27.PMC8311749.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-reported Outcome and Quality of Life after Treatment with External Fixation: A Questionnaire-based Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Shuhei Ugaji, Hidenori Matsubara, Satoshi Kato, Yasuhisa Yoshida, Tomo Hamada, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya\",\"doi\":\"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background This survey aims to assess the satisfaction of patients who have had treatment using external fixation (EF). Materials and methods An original questionnaire and a Short Form 36 (SF-36) were distributed to 121 patients who underwent treatment using EF for deformity correction and lengthening between 2006 and 2016. A multivariate analysis was performed on the factors associated with satisfaction. Results Sixty patients returned a response. The average satisfaction score was 83.6 points. In the 5-point satisfaction survey, 43 of 60 patients (71.7%) responded “very satisfied” or “satisfied” and 27 patients (45.0%) responded “yes” to the question as to whether they would request EF treatment again if presenting with the original preoperative condition. In addition, the subjectively expressed tolerance for having an external fixator device on the limb was 92.1 days on average. A correlation was established with the ISOLS score. Conclusion The top three factors that determined subjective inconvenience with EF are pain, walking, and heaviness. Although EF treatment was stressful, the satisfaction scores were high. Furthermore, the satisfaction with EF treatment was improved by (1) pain control, (2) shortening the EF period, and (3) psychological support. How to cite this article Ugaji S, Matsubara H, Kato S, et al. Patient-reported Outcome and Quality of Life after Treatment with External Fixation: A Questionnaire-based Survey. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(1):27–31.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"27-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/50/0e/stlr-16-27.PMC8311749.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:本调查旨在评估使用外固定支架(EF)治疗的患者满意度。材料和方法:对2006年至2016年间使用EF矫形和延长治疗的121例患者发放原始问卷和SF-36短表。对与满意度相关的因素进行多变量分析。结果:60例患者有应答。平均满意度为83.6分。在5点满意度调查中,60名患者中有43名(71.7%)回答“非常满意”或“满意”,27名患者(45.0%)回答“是”,如果出现术前原始状态,他们是否会再次要求EF治疗。此外,主观表达的肢体外固定架耐受性平均为92.1天。与ISOLS评分存在相关性。结论:影响EF患者主观不便的前三个因素是疼痛、行走和体重。虽然EF治疗有压力,但满意度得分很高。此外,通过(1)疼痛控制,(2)缩短治疗时间,(3)心理支持,可以提高治疗满意度。如何引用本文:Ugaji S, Matsubara H, Kato S等。外固定治疗后患者报告的结果和生活质量:一项基于问卷的调查。创伤肢体重建,2016;16(1):27-31。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient-reported Outcome and Quality of Life after Treatment with External Fixation: A Questionnaire-based Survey.

Patient-reported Outcome and Quality of Life after Treatment with External Fixation: A Questionnaire-based Survey.
Abstract Background This survey aims to assess the satisfaction of patients who have had treatment using external fixation (EF). Materials and methods An original questionnaire and a Short Form 36 (SF-36) were distributed to 121 patients who underwent treatment using EF for deformity correction and lengthening between 2006 and 2016. A multivariate analysis was performed on the factors associated with satisfaction. Results Sixty patients returned a response. The average satisfaction score was 83.6 points. In the 5-point satisfaction survey, 43 of 60 patients (71.7%) responded “very satisfied” or “satisfied” and 27 patients (45.0%) responded “yes” to the question as to whether they would request EF treatment again if presenting with the original preoperative condition. In addition, the subjectively expressed tolerance for having an external fixator device on the limb was 92.1 days on average. A correlation was established with the ISOLS score. Conclusion The top three factors that determined subjective inconvenience with EF are pain, walking, and heaviness. Although EF treatment was stressful, the satisfaction scores were high. Furthermore, the satisfaction with EF treatment was improved by (1) pain control, (2) shortening the EF period, and (3) psychological support. How to cite this article Ugaji S, Matsubara H, Kato S, et al. Patient-reported Outcome and Quality of Life after Treatment with External Fixation: A Questionnaire-based Survey. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(1):27–31.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信