老年人智能家居的伦理和接受度。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Informatics for Health & Social Care Pub Date : 2022-01-02 Epub Date: 2021-07-09 DOI:10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500
Pireh Pirzada, Adriana Wilde, Gayle Helane Doherty, David Harris-Birtill
{"title":"老年人智能家居的伦理和接受度。","authors":"Pireh Pirzada,&nbsp;Adriana Wilde,&nbsp;Gayle Helane Doherty,&nbsp;David Harris-Birtill","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Societal challenges associated with caring for the physical and mental health of older adults worldwide have grown at an unprecedented pace, increasing demand for health-care services and technologies Despite the development of several assistive systems tailored to older adults, the rate of adoption of health technologies is low. This review discusses the ethical and acceptability challenges resulting in low adoption of health technologies specifically focused on smart homes for older adults. The findings have been structured in two categories: Ethical Considerations (Privacy, Social Support, and Autonomy) and Technology Aspects (User Context, Usability, and Training). The findings conclude that older adults community is more likely to adopt assistive systems when four key criteria are met. The technology should: be personalized toward their needs, protect their dignity and independence, provide user control, and not be isolating. Finally, we recommend researchers and developers working on assistive systems to: (1) provide interfaces via smart devices to control and configure the monitoring system with feedback for the user, (2) include various sensors/devices to architect a smart home solution in a way that is easy to integrate in daily life, and (3) define policies about data ownership.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":"47 1","pages":"10-37"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults.\",\"authors\":\"Pireh Pirzada,&nbsp;Adriana Wilde,&nbsp;Gayle Helane Doherty,&nbsp;David Harris-Birtill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Societal challenges associated with caring for the physical and mental health of older adults worldwide have grown at an unprecedented pace, increasing demand for health-care services and technologies Despite the development of several assistive systems tailored to older adults, the rate of adoption of health technologies is low. This review discusses the ethical and acceptability challenges resulting in low adoption of health technologies specifically focused on smart homes for older adults. The findings have been structured in two categories: Ethical Considerations (Privacy, Social Support, and Autonomy) and Technology Aspects (User Context, Usability, and Training). The findings conclude that older adults community is more likely to adopt assistive systems when four key criteria are met. The technology should: be personalized toward their needs, protect their dignity and independence, provide user control, and not be isolating. Finally, we recommend researchers and developers working on assistive systems to: (1) provide interfaces via smart devices to control and configure the monitoring system with feedback for the user, (2) include various sensors/devices to architect a smart home solution in a way that is easy to integrate in daily life, and (3) define policies about data ownership.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Informatics for Health & Social Care\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"10-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Informatics for Health & Social Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2021.1923500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

在世界范围内,与照顾老年人身心健康有关的社会挑战以前所未有的速度增长,对卫生保健服务和技术的需求不断增加,尽管开发了一些针对老年人的辅助系统,但卫生技术的采用率很低。本综述讨论了伦理和可接受性方面的挑战,这些挑战导致健康技术的采用率低,特别是针对老年人的智能家居。调查结果分为两类:道德考虑(隐私、社会支持和自主性)和技术方面(用户背景、可用性和培训)。研究结果表明,当满足四个关键标准时,老年人社区更有可能采用辅助系统。这项技术应该:个性化地满足他们的需求,保护他们的尊严和独立性,提供用户控制,而不是孤立的。最后,我们建议从事辅助系统研究的研究人员和开发人员:(1)通过智能设备提供接口,为用户提供控制和配置监控系统的反馈;(2)包括各种传感器/设备,以一种易于集成到日常生活中的方式构建智能家居解决方案;(3)定义有关数据所有权的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethics and acceptance of smart homes for older adults.

Societal challenges associated with caring for the physical and mental health of older adults worldwide have grown at an unprecedented pace, increasing demand for health-care services and technologies Despite the development of several assistive systems tailored to older adults, the rate of adoption of health technologies is low. This review discusses the ethical and acceptability challenges resulting in low adoption of health technologies specifically focused on smart homes for older adults. The findings have been structured in two categories: Ethical Considerations (Privacy, Social Support, and Autonomy) and Technology Aspects (User Context, Usability, and Training). The findings conclude that older adults community is more likely to adopt assistive systems when four key criteria are met. The technology should: be personalized toward their needs, protect their dignity and independence, provide user control, and not be isolating. Finally, we recommend researchers and developers working on assistive systems to: (1) provide interfaces via smart devices to control and configure the monitoring system with feedback for the user, (2) include various sensors/devices to architect a smart home solution in a way that is easy to integrate in daily life, and (3) define policies about data ownership.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus. The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems. Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects. Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome. Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信