【无虹膜人工晶状体置换定制虹膜人工晶状体】。

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Ophthalmologe Pub Date : 2022-02-01 Epub Date: 2021-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s00347-021-01447-9
C Mayer, D Scharf, R Khoramnia
{"title":"【无虹膜人工晶状体置换定制虹膜人工晶状体】。","authors":"C Mayer,&nbsp;D Scharf,&nbsp;R Khoramnia","doi":"10.1007/s00347-021-01447-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three groups of iris prostheses can be distinguished for the surgical treatment of iris defects: (1) segmental iris implants, (2) combined iris diaphragm intraocular lenses (IOL) and (3) pure iris implants. Most iris reconstructions are accompanied by aphakia correction with secondary IOL implantation. Although the primary goal is to create a pupil and to improve glare perception, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity, the esthetic result is also a relevant component.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Functional and esthetic results after replacement of an aniridia IOL implant with a custom-made artificial iris with IOL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study with seven eyes from seven patients, an iris diaphragm IOL (Morcher GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany) was exchanged for medical reasons (subluxation) against a custom-made artificial iris made of silicone (ArtificialIris, HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) in combination with a sutured IOL. The follow-up period was at least 3 months. Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell count (ECC), complications, glare perception as well as esthetic outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BCVA and ECC showed no statistically significant change between the preoperative and postoperative values (p > 0.05). There was a decentration of the iris IOL implant of 0.27 ± 0.19 mm three months postoperatively. On a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 (1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied), satisfaction with the overall result was rated 8.6 ± 2.5. Subjective glare perception improved to 5.6 ± 3.5 and subjective esthetic impairment improved to 2.4 ± 2.0 on the VAS (1 = none, 10 = extremely strong). Postoperative complications included transient intraocular hypotonia in two eyes, intraocular pressure increase in two eyes, retinal detachment and transient vitreous hemorrhage in one eye each. Of the seven patients six would repeat the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to a rigid aniridia IOL implant, replacement with a custom-made artificial iris in combination with an IOL provides not only a good functional result but simultaneously also an esthetically pleasing result.</p>","PeriodicalId":54676,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologe","volume":"119 2","pages":"181-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00347-021-01447-9","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Exchange of aniridia IOLs for customized iris IOL implants].\",\"authors\":\"C Mayer,&nbsp;D Scharf,&nbsp;R Khoramnia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00347-021-01447-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Three groups of iris prostheses can be distinguished for the surgical treatment of iris defects: (1) segmental iris implants, (2) combined iris diaphragm intraocular lenses (IOL) and (3) pure iris implants. Most iris reconstructions are accompanied by aphakia correction with secondary IOL implantation. Although the primary goal is to create a pupil and to improve glare perception, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity, the esthetic result is also a relevant component.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Functional and esthetic results after replacement of an aniridia IOL implant with a custom-made artificial iris with IOL.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study with seven eyes from seven patients, an iris diaphragm IOL (Morcher GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany) was exchanged for medical reasons (subluxation) against a custom-made artificial iris made of silicone (ArtificialIris, HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) in combination with a sutured IOL. The follow-up period was at least 3 months. Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell count (ECC), complications, glare perception as well as esthetic outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BCVA and ECC showed no statistically significant change between the preoperative and postoperative values (p > 0.05). There was a decentration of the iris IOL implant of 0.27 ± 0.19 mm three months postoperatively. On a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 (1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied), satisfaction with the overall result was rated 8.6 ± 2.5. Subjective glare perception improved to 5.6 ± 3.5 and subjective esthetic impairment improved to 2.4 ± 2.0 on the VAS (1 = none, 10 = extremely strong). Postoperative complications included transient intraocular hypotonia in two eyes, intraocular pressure increase in two eyes, retinal detachment and transient vitreous hemorrhage in one eye each. Of the seven patients six would repeat the procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to a rigid aniridia IOL implant, replacement with a custom-made artificial iris in combination with an IOL provides not only a good functional result but simultaneously also an esthetically pleasing result.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"volume\":\"119 2\",\"pages\":\"181-189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00347-021-01447-9\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmologe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01447-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologe","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-021-01447-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:手术治疗虹膜缺损可将虹膜假体分为三大类:(1)节段性虹膜植入,(2)联合虹膜隔膜人工晶状体(IOL)和(3)纯虹膜植入。大多数虹膜重建伴有无晶状体矫正和二次人工晶状体植入术。虽然主要目标是创造一个瞳孔,提高眩光感知,对比敏感度和视觉敏锐度,但美学结果也是一个相关的组成部分。目的:观察人工虹膜人工晶状体置换无虹膜人工晶状体后的功能和美观效果。材料和方法:在这项回顾性研究中,来自7名患者的7只眼睛,由于医疗原因(半脱位),将虹膜隔膜人工晶状体(Morcher GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany)与定制的硅胶人工虹膜(artificial iris, HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany)结合缝合的人工晶状体进行交换。随访期至少3个月。评估最佳矫正距离视力(BCVA)、内皮细胞计数(ECC)、并发症、眩光感知、美学结果和患者满意度。结果:BCVA、ECC术前、术后差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。术后3个月,人工晶状体离体0.27 ±0.19 mm。在视觉模拟量表(VAS)上,从1到10(1 =完全不满意,10 =非常满意),对总体结果的满意度为8.6 ±2.5。主观眩光感知改善至5.6 ±3.5,主观审美障碍改善至2.4 ±2.0(1 =无,10 =极强)。术后并发症包括2眼一过性眼内张力低下,2眼眼压升高,1眼视网膜脱离,1眼一过性玻璃体出血。在这7名患者中,有6人会重复这一过程。结论:与刚性无虹膜人工晶状体相比,定制人工虹膜联合人工晶状体不仅具有良好的功能效果,而且具有美观的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Exchange of aniridia IOLs for customized iris IOL implants].

Background: Three groups of iris prostheses can be distinguished for the surgical treatment of iris defects: (1) segmental iris implants, (2) combined iris diaphragm intraocular lenses (IOL) and (3) pure iris implants. Most iris reconstructions are accompanied by aphakia correction with secondary IOL implantation. Although the primary goal is to create a pupil and to improve glare perception, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity, the esthetic result is also a relevant component.

Objective: Functional and esthetic results after replacement of an aniridia IOL implant with a custom-made artificial iris with IOL.

Material and methods: In this retrospective study with seven eyes from seven patients, an iris diaphragm IOL (Morcher GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany) was exchanged for medical reasons (subluxation) against a custom-made artificial iris made of silicone (ArtificialIris, HumanOptics, Erlangen, Germany) in combination with a sutured IOL. The follow-up period was at least 3 months. Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell count (ECC), complications, glare perception as well as esthetic outcome and patient satisfaction were evaluated.

Results: The BCVA and ECC showed no statistically significant change between the preoperative and postoperative values (p > 0.05). There was a decentration of the iris IOL implant of 0.27 ± 0.19 mm three months postoperatively. On a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 (1 = not satisfied at all, 10 = extremely satisfied), satisfaction with the overall result was rated 8.6 ± 2.5. Subjective glare perception improved to 5.6 ± 3.5 and subjective esthetic impairment improved to 2.4 ± 2.0 on the VAS (1 = none, 10 = extremely strong). Postoperative complications included transient intraocular hypotonia in two eyes, intraocular pressure increase in two eyes, retinal detachment and transient vitreous hemorrhage in one eye each. Of the seven patients six would repeat the procedure.

Conclusion: Compared to a rigid aniridia IOL implant, replacement with a custom-made artificial iris in combination with an IOL provides not only a good functional result but simultaneously also an esthetically pleasing result.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmologe
Ophthalmologe 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Ophthalmologe is an internationally recognized journal dealing with all aspects of ophthalmology. The journal serves both the scientific exchange and the continuing education of ophthalmologists. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve scientific exchange. Case reports feature interesting cases and aim at optimizing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Comprehensive reviews on a specific topical issue focus on providing evidenced based information on diagnostics and therapy. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信