磁铁在正畸治疗中的应用:哪些适应症,哪些效果?文献综述]。

Q4 Medicine
Loris Wagner, Aaron Dellinger, Thibault Siebert, Sarah Gebeile-Chauty
{"title":"磁铁在正畸治疗中的应用:哪些适应症,哪些效果?文献综述]。","authors":"Loris Wagner,&nbsp;Aaron Dellinger,&nbsp;Thibault Siebert,&nbsp;Sarah Gebeile-Chauty","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2020.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The first publication on the use of magnets in dentistry for stabilizing prosthetics on implants dates back to 1953. Clinical development in orthodontics, without having experienced a real boom, has increased over the past ten years, in parallel with the improvement of the device. The objective of this review of the literature is to synthesize clinical applications and reported iatrogenic effects. A systematic review of the international literature from the Pubmed and Cochrane databases from 1999 to July 2018 was conducted which resulted in 36 articles. The factors studied are the indications and contraindications, the means or procedure, as well as the iatrogenic effects. Original cases are presented. The correction of infraclusions is the main indication, followed by the correction of anteroposterior malocclusions and then the correction of over-erupted teeth. Traction of an impacted teeth and diastema closure have not been found in recent publications probably because of the low benefit-risk ratio. The future no longer seems to be buried magnets or left in the long term in the mouth considering there seems to be concerns in terms of toxicity (or even the risk in terms of vital prognosis). The magnets could offer interesting perspectives to manage the current limits of the aligners, the movements of anterior egression, rotation and previous torque being still problematic...</p>","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":"91 4","pages":"373-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Magnets in orthodontics : which indications, which effects ? A review of the literature].\",\"authors\":\"Loris Wagner,&nbsp;Aaron Dellinger,&nbsp;Thibault Siebert,&nbsp;Sarah Gebeile-Chauty\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/orthodfr.2020.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The first publication on the use of magnets in dentistry for stabilizing prosthetics on implants dates back to 1953. Clinical development in orthodontics, without having experienced a real boom, has increased over the past ten years, in parallel with the improvement of the device. The objective of this review of the literature is to synthesize clinical applications and reported iatrogenic effects. A systematic review of the international literature from the Pubmed and Cochrane databases from 1999 to July 2018 was conducted which resulted in 36 articles. The factors studied are the indications and contraindications, the means or procedure, as well as the iatrogenic effects. Original cases are presented. The correction of infraclusions is the main indication, followed by the correction of anteroposterior malocclusions and then the correction of over-erupted teeth. Traction of an impacted teeth and diastema closure have not been found in recent publications probably because of the low benefit-risk ratio. The future no longer seems to be buried magnets or left in the long term in the mouth considering there seems to be concerns in terms of toxicity (or even the risk in terms of vital prognosis). The magnets could offer interesting perspectives to manage the current limits of the aligners, the movements of anterior egression, rotation and previous torque being still problematic...</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"volume\":\"91 4\",\"pages\":\"373-392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2020.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2020.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于在牙科中使用磁铁来稳定植入体上的修复体的第一份出版物可以追溯到1953年。临床发展的正畸,没有经历一个真正的繁荣,增加了在过去的十年中,与设备的改进并行。本综述的目的是综合临床应用和报道的医源性效应。对1999年至2018年7月Pubmed和Cochrane数据库中的国际文献进行了系统综述,共收录了36篇文章。研究了适应症和禁忌症、方法或程序以及医源性影响等因素。原始案例提出。主要指征是下嵌体矫正,其次是前后牙合错误矫正,然后是过出牙矫正。牵引阻生牙和关闭牙间隙在最近的出版物中尚未发现,可能是因为低风险比。未来似乎不再是埋藏磁铁或长期留在嘴里,考虑到似乎存在毒性方面的担忧(甚至是生命预后方面的风险)。磁铁可以提供有趣的观点来管理目前的限制对准器,前牙的运动,旋转和以前的扭矩仍然是问题……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Magnets in orthodontics : which indications, which effects ? A review of the literature].

The first publication on the use of magnets in dentistry for stabilizing prosthetics on implants dates back to 1953. Clinical development in orthodontics, without having experienced a real boom, has increased over the past ten years, in parallel with the improvement of the device. The objective of this review of the literature is to synthesize clinical applications and reported iatrogenic effects. A systematic review of the international literature from the Pubmed and Cochrane databases from 1999 to July 2018 was conducted which resulted in 36 articles. The factors studied are the indications and contraindications, the means or procedure, as well as the iatrogenic effects. Original cases are presented. The correction of infraclusions is the main indication, followed by the correction of anteroposterior malocclusions and then the correction of over-erupted teeth. Traction of an impacted teeth and diastema closure have not been found in recent publications probably because of the low benefit-risk ratio. The future no longer seems to be buried magnets or left in the long term in the mouth considering there seems to be concerns in terms of toxicity (or even the risk in terms of vital prognosis). The magnets could offer interesting perspectives to manage the current limits of the aligners, the movements of anterior egression, rotation and previous torque being still problematic...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
L'' Orthodontie française
L'' Orthodontie française Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信