Leonardo Osti, Lorenzo Milani, Silvana Ferrari, Nicola Maffulli
{"title":"肩峰下垫片植入术:关节镜下上囊重建的替代方法。系统回顾。","authors":"Leonardo Osti, Lorenzo Milani, Silvana Ferrari, Nicola Maffulli","doi":"10.1093/bmb/ldab014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review evaluated and compared the use of a subacromial spacer implantation (SSI) with arthroscopic superior capsular repair (ASCR) in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) with an assessment of clinical and imaging outcomes.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>This systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched in PubMed, Medline and Embase database literature using the keywords 'subacromial spacer', 'subacromial balloon', 'subacromial device', 'arthroscopy', 'superior capsular reconstruction', 'irreparable rotator cuff tears', 'satisfaction' and 'quality of life'.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>We included a total of 29 articles (14 about SSI and 15 about ASCR) dealing with outcomes, satisfaction and patients' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The use of a subacromial spacer showed similar results in terms of patients' satisfaction and quality of life when compared with ASCR.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>SSI can be implanted quickly and has a low complication rate. It can therefore be considered a good alternative for the management of MIRCTs.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>The subacromial spacer is a biodegradable implant easily implanted at arthroscopy. It can lead good clinical and imaging outcomes in MIRCTs. Similarly, ASCR can be performed with either an autograft or synthetic allograft transplantation, with satisfactory results. Long-term prospective studies are needed to compare SSI and ASCR to verify their effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9280,"journal":{"name":"British medical bulletin","volume":"139 1","pages":"59-72"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subacromial spacer implantation: an alternative to arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction. A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Osti, Lorenzo Milani, Silvana Ferrari, Nicola Maffulli\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bmb/ldab014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This systematic review evaluated and compared the use of a subacromial spacer implantation (SSI) with arthroscopic superior capsular repair (ASCR) in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) with an assessment of clinical and imaging outcomes.</p><p><strong>Sources of data: </strong>This systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched in PubMed, Medline and Embase database literature using the keywords 'subacromial spacer', 'subacromial balloon', 'subacromial device', 'arthroscopy', 'superior capsular reconstruction', 'irreparable rotator cuff tears', 'satisfaction' and 'quality of life'.</p><p><strong>Areas of agreement: </strong>We included a total of 29 articles (14 about SSI and 15 about ASCR) dealing with outcomes, satisfaction and patients' quality of life.</p><p><strong>Areas of controversy: </strong>The use of a subacromial spacer showed similar results in terms of patients' satisfaction and quality of life when compared with ASCR.</p><p><strong>Growing points: </strong>SSI can be implanted quickly and has a low complication rate. It can therefore be considered a good alternative for the management of MIRCTs.</p><p><strong>Areas timely for developing research: </strong>The subacromial spacer is a biodegradable implant easily implanted at arthroscopy. It can lead good clinical and imaging outcomes in MIRCTs. Similarly, ASCR can be performed with either an autograft or synthetic allograft transplantation, with satisfactory results. Long-term prospective studies are needed to compare SSI and ASCR to verify their effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"59-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British medical bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British medical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldab014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Subacromial spacer implantation: an alternative to arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction. A systematic review.
Introduction: This systematic review evaluated and compared the use of a subacromial spacer implantation (SSI) with arthroscopic superior capsular repair (ASCR) in the management of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) with an assessment of clinical and imaging outcomes.
Sources of data: This systematic review was carried out following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched in PubMed, Medline and Embase database literature using the keywords 'subacromial spacer', 'subacromial balloon', 'subacromial device', 'arthroscopy', 'superior capsular reconstruction', 'irreparable rotator cuff tears', 'satisfaction' and 'quality of life'.
Areas of agreement: We included a total of 29 articles (14 about SSI and 15 about ASCR) dealing with outcomes, satisfaction and patients' quality of life.
Areas of controversy: The use of a subacromial spacer showed similar results in terms of patients' satisfaction and quality of life when compared with ASCR.
Growing points: SSI can be implanted quickly and has a low complication rate. It can therefore be considered a good alternative for the management of MIRCTs.
Areas timely for developing research: The subacromial spacer is a biodegradable implant easily implanted at arthroscopy. It can lead good clinical and imaging outcomes in MIRCTs. Similarly, ASCR can be performed with either an autograft or synthetic allograft transplantation, with satisfactory results. Long-term prospective studies are needed to compare SSI and ASCR to verify their effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
British Medical Bulletin is a multidisciplinary publication, which comprises high quality reviews aimed at generalist physicians, junior doctors, and medical students in both developed and developing countries.
Its key aims are to provide interpretations of growing points in medicine by trusted experts in the field, and to assist practitioners in incorporating not just evidence but new conceptual ways of thinking into their practice.