= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该镇的土地面积为。马克斯·韦伯的统治社会学重新审视了民族民粹主义和法西斯主义的历史比较。马克斯·韦伯统治社会学的现实性]。

IF 1.2 3区社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY

Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-25 DOI:10.1007/s11609-021-00436-8

Maurizio Bach

{"title":"= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该镇的土地面积为。马克斯·韦伯的统治社会学重新审视了民族民粹主义和法西斯主义的历史比较。马克斯·韦伯统治社会学的现实性]。","authors":"Maurizio Bach","doi":"10.1007/s11609-021-00436-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of rightwing populism in the last decade, but more recently also the seemingly \"authoritarian\" measures taken by the state in protection against the COVID-19 pandemic, inspire ever more frequent comparisons with historical fascism. The paper discusses to what extent such a diachronic comparison is empirically and methodologically sound. The analysis is based in Max Weber's concept of \"ideal type\", which can be used as a tertium comparationis. The concept of \"fascist minimum\", which systematizes the structural features of fascist movements and regimes, provides a standard of comparison that combines theoretical rigor and empirical substance. Applying the concept of \"fascist minimum\", the article examines if and to what extent current tendencies of and in German politics deserve to be called \"fascist\".","PeriodicalId":51909,"journal":{"name":"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie","volume":"31 1","pages":"81-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11609-021-00436-8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[National populism and fascism in a comparative historical perspective. Max Weber's sociology of domination revisitedComparaison historique entre national-populisme et fascisme. Sur l'actualité de la sociologie de la domination de Max Weber].\",\"authors\":\"Maurizio Bach\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11609-021-00436-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rise of rightwing populism in the last decade, but more recently also the seemingly \\\"authoritarian\\\" measures taken by the state in protection against the COVID-19 pandemic, inspire ever more frequent comparisons with historical fascism. The paper discusses to what extent such a diachronic comparison is empirically and methodologically sound. The analysis is based in Max Weber's concept of \\\"ideal type\\\", which can be used as a tertium comparationis. The concept of \\\"fascist minimum\\\", which systematizes the structural features of fascist movements and regimes, provides a standard of comparison that combines theoretical rigor and empirical substance. Applying the concept of \\\"fascist minimum\\\", the article examines if and to what extent current tendencies of and in German politics deserve to be called \\\"fascist\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":51909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"81-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11609-021-00436-8\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-021-00436-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-021-00436-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

过去十年右翼民粹主义的兴起，以及最近国家为抵御COVID-19大流行而采取的看似“威权”的措施，让人们越来越频繁地将其与历史上的法西斯主义进行比较。本文讨论了这种历时比较在多大程度上在经验和方法上是合理的。这一分析是基于马克斯·韦伯的“理想类型”概念，这可以作为一个比较标准。“法西斯最低限度”的概念将法西斯运动和政权的结构特征系统化，提供了一个结合理论严谨性和经验实质的比较标准。本文运用“法西斯主义最低限度”的概念，考察了当前德国政治的趋势是否以及在多大程度上可以被称为“法西斯主义”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

[National populism and fascism in a comparative historical perspective. Max Weber's sociology of domination revisitedComparaison historique entre national-populisme et fascisme. Sur l'actualité de la sociologie de la domination de Max Weber].

The rise of rightwing populism in the last decade, but more recently also the seemingly "authoritarian" measures taken by the state in protection against the COVID-19 pandemic, inspire ever more frequent comparisons with historical fascism. The paper discusses to what extent such a diachronic comparison is empirically and methodologically sound. The analysis is based in Max Weber's concept of "ideal type", which can be used as a tertium comparationis. The concept of "fascist minimum", which systematizes the structural features of fascist movements and regimes, provides a standard of comparison that combines theoretical rigor and empirical substance. Applying the concept of "fascist minimum", the article examines if and to what extent current tendencies of and in German politics deserve to be called "fascist".

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Berliner Journal Fur Soziologie SOCIOLOGY-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

27.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Berliner Journal für Soziologie (“Berlin Journal of Sociology”), edited by the Institute of Sociology at the Friedrich Schiller University Jena and the Institute of Social Sciences at the Humboldt University Berlin, publishes double-blind peer-reviewed articles on classical and modern theoretical approaches, essays on current problem areas of sociological discourse, and research notes presenting new empirical findings. Focussed issues and review essays reflect innovative developments within the German and international social sciences and inform about the state of research in central areas of sociology. The journal was founded in 1991 on the initiative of the East German Society of Sociology. It views itself as a general sociological journal that publishes contributions from all research and subject areas of sociology. From the very beginning, the programmatic aim has been to provide a forum for the discussion and further development of sociological problems in the light of contemporary theoretical and social developments. Two major topics have been at the journal''s core and will continue to shape its contents in the future: Transformation and Culture. The journal deals with the socio-ecological upheaval that modern societies are undergoing. Globalisation, changes in working society and lifestyles, digitalisation, social conflicts up to new wars, new challenges for democracy, populism and nationalism as well as gender relations are important topics of a renewed Great Transformation. Cultural sociology and comparative cultural research deal with developments in these fields in a special way. The BJS therefore continues to devote its attention to such perspectives.