[加泰罗尼亚职业卫生服务中医务人员的需求和障碍]。

Q4 Medicine
Hernán Vargas Leguás, Eva Porcel Pérez, Imma Cortès Franch
{"title":"[加泰罗尼亚职业卫生服务中医务人员的需求和障碍]。","authors":"Hernán Vargas Leguás,&nbsp;Eva Porcel Pérez,&nbsp;Imma Cortès Franch","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2021.24.02.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to identify the difficulties and needs of medical professionals in occupational health services in Catalonia with respect to carrying out their functions, as prescribed by law.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Delphi study in three rounds. The selection of participants was carried out sepa - rately for in-house versus outsourced occupational health services. The first round included two open-ended questions: What difficulties do you encounter when performing your duties in your occupational health service? And, what are your needs in terms of being able to per - form your duties in your occupational health service? In the second and third rounds, partic - ipants ranked the categories identified in the first round according to their importance and relevance. We calculated an inter-rater agreement index (ICC) and an \"index of concern (IP)\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among in-house occupational health services, the most highly ranked difficulties were case management of workers with limitations and the low quality of medical sur - veillance systems. Among outsourced occupational health services, the most notable dif - ficulties were the lack of communication with other organizations and the prioritization of economic and profitability criteria associated with the high work volume. For both types of services, there was a clear need to establish communication channels with other institu - tions or organizations such as primary care, mutual insurance companies, public medical evaluation units and public occupational health units.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The different type of occupational health services reflects important differ - ences in the types of difficulties encountered, but not in needs, where there are more points in common.</p>","PeriodicalId":38326,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","volume":"24 2","pages":"46-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Needs and barriers of medical personnel in Catalonian occupational health services].\",\"authors\":\"Hernán Vargas Leguás,&nbsp;Eva Porcel Pérez,&nbsp;Imma Cortès Franch\",\"doi\":\"10.12961/aprl.2021.24.02.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to identify the difficulties and needs of medical professionals in occupational health services in Catalonia with respect to carrying out their functions, as prescribed by law.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Delphi study in three rounds. The selection of participants was carried out sepa - rately for in-house versus outsourced occupational health services. The first round included two open-ended questions: What difficulties do you encounter when performing your duties in your occupational health service? And, what are your needs in terms of being able to per - form your duties in your occupational health service? In the second and third rounds, partic - ipants ranked the categories identified in the first round according to their importance and relevance. We calculated an inter-rater agreement index (ICC) and an \\\"index of concern (IP)\\\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among in-house occupational health services, the most highly ranked difficulties were case management of workers with limitations and the low quality of medical sur - veillance systems. Among outsourced occupational health services, the most notable dif - ficulties were the lack of communication with other organizations and the prioritization of economic and profitability criteria associated with the high work volume. For both types of services, there was a clear need to establish communication channels with other institu - tions or organizations such as primary care, mutual insurance companies, public medical evaluation units and public occupational health units.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The different type of occupational health services reflects important differ - ences in the types of difficulties encountered, but not in needs, where there are more points in common.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"46-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2021.24.02.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevención de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2021.24.02.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:查明加泰罗尼亚职业卫生服务专业人员在依法履行职责方面的困难和需要。方法:三轮德尔菲研究。参与者的选择分别针对内部和外包的职业健康服务进行。第一轮包括两个开放式问题:你在职业卫生服务部门履行职责时遇到什么困难?在职业健康服务中,你需要什么才能履行你的职责?在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者根据其重要性和相关性对第一轮确定的类别进行排名。我们计算了评级机构间协议指数(ICC)和“关注指数(IP)”。结果:在内部职业卫生服务中,最严重的困难是局限性工人的病例管理和医疗监测系统的质量低下。在外包职业保健服务中,最显著的困难是缺乏与其他组织的沟通,以及与高工作量相关的经济和盈利标准的优先次序。对于这两类服务,显然需要与其他机构或组织建立沟通渠道,如初级保健、相互保险公司、公共医疗评估单位和公共职业保健单位。结论:不同类型的职业卫生服务反映了遇到的困难类型的重要差异,但没有反映需求的差异,其中有更多的共同点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Needs and barriers of medical personnel in Catalonian occupational health services].

Objective: to identify the difficulties and needs of medical professionals in occupational health services in Catalonia with respect to carrying out their functions, as prescribed by law.

Methods: Delphi study in three rounds. The selection of participants was carried out sepa - rately for in-house versus outsourced occupational health services. The first round included two open-ended questions: What difficulties do you encounter when performing your duties in your occupational health service? And, what are your needs in terms of being able to per - form your duties in your occupational health service? In the second and third rounds, partic - ipants ranked the categories identified in the first round according to their importance and relevance. We calculated an inter-rater agreement index (ICC) and an "index of concern (IP)".

Results: Among in-house occupational health services, the most highly ranked difficulties were case management of workers with limitations and the low quality of medical sur - veillance systems. Among outsourced occupational health services, the most notable dif - ficulties were the lack of communication with other organizations and the prioritization of economic and profitability criteria associated with the high work volume. For both types of services, there was a clear need to establish communication channels with other institu - tions or organizations such as primary care, mutual insurance companies, public medical evaluation units and public occupational health units.

Conclusions: The different type of occupational health services reflects important differ - ences in the types of difficulties encountered, but not in needs, where there are more points in common.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信