5岁先天性和非单侧唇腭裂儿童复述时的叙述能力是否有差异?

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-14 DOI:10.1080/14015439.2020.1822441
Ketty Andersson, Kristina Klintö
{"title":"5岁先天性和非单侧唇腭裂儿童复述时的叙述能力是否有差异?","authors":"Ketty Andersson,&nbsp;Kristina Klintö","doi":"10.1080/14015439.2020.1822441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A previous study has indicated poorer narrative ability during retelling in 5-year-olds with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) as a group, compared to peers without UCLP.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate if there are any differences between 5-year-olds with and without UCLP in narrative ability during retelling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 83 children participated, 51 with UCLP and 32 without. They had no known additional malformations or syndromes. The children were audio recorded while performing the Bus Story Test (BST). The recordings were orthographically transcribed. From the transcriptions the BST information score was calculated. The macrostructure of the narratives was assessed with the Narrative Scoring Scheme (NSS), and the microstructure with mean length of utterance in words, grammaticality, grammatical complexity and lexical diversity. Results for children with and without UCLP were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group with UCLP performed better than the group without UCLP in the NSS sub-category Conclusion. No other significant differences were seen between the groups. The UCLP group had a larger standard deviation for the information score than the group without UCLP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The group with UCLP displayed at least as good results as the group without UCLP, but the information score was more varied for the UCLP group than for the group without UCLP.</p>","PeriodicalId":49903,"journal":{"name":"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14015439.2020.1822441","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the narrative ability during retelling differ in 5-year-olds born with and without unilateral cleft lip and palate?\",\"authors\":\"Ketty Andersson,&nbsp;Kristina Klintö\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14015439.2020.1822441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A previous study has indicated poorer narrative ability during retelling in 5-year-olds with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) as a group, compared to peers without UCLP.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate if there are any differences between 5-year-olds with and without UCLP in narrative ability during retelling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 83 children participated, 51 with UCLP and 32 without. They had no known additional malformations or syndromes. The children were audio recorded while performing the Bus Story Test (BST). The recordings were orthographically transcribed. From the transcriptions the BST information score was calculated. The macrostructure of the narratives was assessed with the Narrative Scoring Scheme (NSS), and the microstructure with mean length of utterance in words, grammaticality, grammatical complexity and lexical diversity. Results for children with and without UCLP were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The group with UCLP performed better than the group without UCLP in the NSS sub-category Conclusion. No other significant differences were seen between the groups. The UCLP group had a larger standard deviation for the information score than the group without UCLP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The group with UCLP displayed at least as good results as the group without UCLP, but the information score was more varied for the UCLP group than for the group without UCLP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14015439.2020.1822441\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2020.1822441\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14015439.2020.1822441","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:先前的一项研究表明,与没有单侧唇腭裂的同龄人相比,5岁儿童单侧唇腭裂(UCLP)的复述能力较差。目的:探讨5岁儿童在复述过程中有无UCLP的叙事能力差异。方法:83名儿童参与,51名患有UCLP, 32名未患有UCLP。他们没有已知的其他畸形或综合征。孩子们在进行巴士故事测试(BST)时被录音。录音是按正字法誊写的。从转录计算BST信息得分。采用叙事计分法(NSS)对叙事的宏观结构、微观结构、平均话语长度、语法性、语法复杂性和词汇多样性进行评价。对有无UCLP患儿的结果进行比较。结果:有UCLP组在NSS亚分类中的表现优于无UCLP组。两组之间没有其他显著差异。UCLP组的信息评分标准偏差大于非UCLP组。结论:有UCLP组至少与无UCLP组表现出同样好的结果,但与无UCLP组相比,有UCLP组的信息评分差异更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the narrative ability during retelling differ in 5-year-olds born with and without unilateral cleft lip and palate?

Background: A previous study has indicated poorer narrative ability during retelling in 5-year-olds with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) as a group, compared to peers without UCLP.

Aim: To investigate if there are any differences between 5-year-olds with and without UCLP in narrative ability during retelling.

Methods: A total of 83 children participated, 51 with UCLP and 32 without. They had no known additional malformations or syndromes. The children were audio recorded while performing the Bus Story Test (BST). The recordings were orthographically transcribed. From the transcriptions the BST information score was calculated. The macrostructure of the narratives was assessed with the Narrative Scoring Scheme (NSS), and the microstructure with mean length of utterance in words, grammaticality, grammatical complexity and lexical diversity. Results for children with and without UCLP were compared.

Results: The group with UCLP performed better than the group without UCLP in the NSS sub-category Conclusion. No other significant differences were seen between the groups. The UCLP group had a larger standard deviation for the information score than the group without UCLP.

Conclusions: The group with UCLP displayed at least as good results as the group without UCLP, but the information score was more varied for the UCLP group than for the group without UCLP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology
Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology is an amalgamation of the former journals Scandinavian Journal of Logopedics & Phoniatrics and VOICE. The intention is to cover topics related to speech, language and voice pathology as well as normal voice function in its different aspects. The Journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Phonation and laryngeal physiology Speech and language development Voice disorders Clinical measurements of speech, language and voice Professional voice including singing Bilingualism Cleft lip and palate Dyslexia Fluency disorders Neurolinguistics and psycholinguistics Aphasia Motor speech disorders Voice rehabilitation of laryngectomees Augmentative and alternative communication Acoustics Dysphagia Publications may have the form of original articles, i.e. theoretical or methodological studies or empirical reports, of reviews of books and dissertations, as well as of short reports, of minor or ongoing studies or short notes, commenting on earlier published material. Submitted papers will be evaluated by referees with relevant expertise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信