不同表面调理方法处理的金属托架与长石陶瓷的结合强度:体外研究。

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Duygu Recen, Bengisu Yildirim, Eman Othman, Erhan Comlekoglu, Isil Aras
{"title":"不同表面调理方法处理的金属托架与长石陶瓷的结合强度:体外研究。","authors":"Duygu Recen,&nbsp;Bengisu Yildirim,&nbsp;Eman Othman,&nbsp;Erhan Comlekoglu,&nbsp;Isil Aras","doi":"10.26650/eor.20210004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare MEP which is originally manufactured for increasing bond strength between organic resins and ceramic with conventional surface treatment methods in preparation of leucite-reinforced FC surfaces regarding shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel brackets and the mode of bond failure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty specimens that were fabricated from FC material and glazed were randomly assigned to four surface conditioning methods: (1) CoJet Sand; (2) MEP; (3) HF acid etching followed by silane coupling agent; (4) Diamond bur followed by silane coupling agent. The SBS was determined using universal testing machine. Bond failure sites were classified according to Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference (p less than 0.05) was found in SBS between the groups while significant intergroup differences were detected concerning ARI scores (p less than 0.001). Group 1 had ARI score 1 and 2 indicating mode of failure at the adhesive interface with greater percentage of the adhesive left on bracket base. The other groups had higher frequency of ARI score 3 and 2. The quantity of the ARI retained on the ceramic surface was highest in Group 3, followed by Group 4 and Group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MEP can be a suitable alternative for bonding metal brackets to FC surface.</p>","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"55 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f5/05/eor-055-001.PMC8055263.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond strength of metal brackets to feldspathic ceramic treated with different surface conditioning methods: an in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"Duygu Recen,&nbsp;Bengisu Yildirim,&nbsp;Eman Othman,&nbsp;Erhan Comlekoglu,&nbsp;Isil Aras\",\"doi\":\"10.26650/eor.20210004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare MEP which is originally manufactured for increasing bond strength between organic resins and ceramic with conventional surface treatment methods in preparation of leucite-reinforced FC surfaces regarding shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel brackets and the mode of bond failure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Forty specimens that were fabricated from FC material and glazed were randomly assigned to four surface conditioning methods: (1) CoJet Sand; (2) MEP; (3) HF acid etching followed by silane coupling agent; (4) Diamond bur followed by silane coupling agent. The SBS was determined using universal testing machine. Bond failure sites were classified according to Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant difference (p less than 0.05) was found in SBS between the groups while significant intergroup differences were detected concerning ARI scores (p less than 0.001). Group 1 had ARI score 1 and 2 indicating mode of failure at the adhesive interface with greater percentage of the adhesive left on bracket base. The other groups had higher frequency of ARI score 3 and 2. The quantity of the ARI retained on the ceramic surface was highest in Group 3, followed by Group 4 and Group 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MEP can be a suitable alternative for bonding metal brackets to FC surface.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Oral Research\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f5/05/eor-055-001.PMC8055263.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Oral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20210004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20210004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:比较用于提高有机树脂与陶瓷结合强度的MEP与传统表面处理方法在制备白晶石增强FC表面时对不锈钢支架的剪切结合强度(SBS)和结合破坏模式的影响。材料和方法:将40个FC材料和釉面材料制成的试件随机分为四种表面处理方法:(1)CoJet砂;(2)议员;(3)氟化氢酸蚀刻,然后用硅烷偶联剂;(4)金刚石偶联剂,其次是硅烷偶联剂。SBS采用万能试验机测定。根据粘接残余指数(ARI)对粘接失效部位进行分类。结果:SBS组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05), ARI评分组间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。组1的ARI评分为1分和2分,表明粘接剂界面的破坏模式,粘接剂残留在支架底座上的比例较大。其他组ARI得分为3分和2分的频率更高。陶瓷表面残留的ARI数量以组3最多,组4次之,组2次之。结论:MEP可作为金属支架与FC表面粘接的理想选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bond strength of metal brackets to feldspathic ceramic treated with different surface conditioning methods: an in vitro study.

Bond strength of metal brackets to feldspathic ceramic treated with different surface conditioning methods: an in vitro study.

Purpose: To compare MEP which is originally manufactured for increasing bond strength between organic resins and ceramic with conventional surface treatment methods in preparation of leucite-reinforced FC surfaces regarding shear bond strength (SBS) of stainless steel brackets and the mode of bond failure.

Materials and methods: Forty specimens that were fabricated from FC material and glazed were randomly assigned to four surface conditioning methods: (1) CoJet Sand; (2) MEP; (3) HF acid etching followed by silane coupling agent; (4) Diamond bur followed by silane coupling agent. The SBS was determined using universal testing machine. Bond failure sites were classified according to Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).

Results: No statistically significant difference (p less than 0.05) was found in SBS between the groups while significant intergroup differences were detected concerning ARI scores (p less than 0.001). Group 1 had ARI score 1 and 2 indicating mode of failure at the adhesive interface with greater percentage of the adhesive left on bracket base. The other groups had higher frequency of ARI score 3 and 2. The quantity of the ARI retained on the ceramic surface was highest in Group 3, followed by Group 4 and Group 2.

Conclusion: MEP can be a suitable alternative for bonding metal brackets to FC surface.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Oral Research
European Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信