确定指标和评估步骤,并提出改善伊朗创伤护理的建议:专家的观点。

Journal of injury & violence research Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-24 DOI:10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1589
Yalda Mousazadeh, Ali Janati, Mahboub Pouraghaei, Homayoun Sadeghi Bazargani
{"title":"确定指标和评估步骤,并提出改善伊朗创伤护理的建议:专家的观点。","authors":"Yalda Mousazadeh,&nbsp;Ali Janati,&nbsp;Mahboub Pouraghaei,&nbsp;Homayoun Sadeghi Bazargani","doi":"10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma is one of the major causes of mortality across the world. Trauma patients have critical status and need timely, adequate, and organized care. The different consequences of trauma care among service centers around the world and even within a country revealed the need for careful evaluation. This study was designed and executed to collect experts' opinions on the evaluation steps, related indicators, and improvement strategies in trauma care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was based on a conventional content analysis approach. 2 focus group discussions (FGD) with 6 participants per FGD and 16 face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted to collect the required information (from September 2018 to early 2019). Participants were selected through the purposive sampling method. The experts' viewpoints were classified by the main and sub themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four basic themes extracted from the interviews and focus group discussions including, trauma care importance (sub-themes: the involved individuals' being young and productive and the effectiveness of trauma care); trauma care indicators (sub-themes: pre-hospital indicators, in-hospital indicators, and post-hospital indicators); stages of trauma care evaluation (sub-themes: evaluation prerequisites, finalization of indicators before the evaluation, determining evaluation time scope, determining evaluation dimensions, external and internal evaluation and use of evaluation results); trauma care improvement (sub-themes: balancing workload in trauma centers, enhancement of information system, considering extra-organizational dimensions in trauma care and empowerment of trauma care providers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to experts' viewpoints, trauma is a very important issue, because it involves young people. They believed that having indicators covering all aspects of care assist health managers and policymakers to understand under-standard performance. These indicators should be used in the form of a specific evaluation program and related to Iran context. Besides, reforming macro policies, planning, development of infrastructures, and education was some recommendations of experts to improve trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of injury & violence research","volume":"13 2","pages":"99-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying indicators and evaluation steps with suggestions for improving trauma care in Iran: experts' perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Yalda Mousazadeh,&nbsp;Ali Janati,&nbsp;Mahboub Pouraghaei,&nbsp;Homayoun Sadeghi Bazargani\",\"doi\":\"10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma is one of the major causes of mortality across the world. Trauma patients have critical status and need timely, adequate, and organized care. The different consequences of trauma care among service centers around the world and even within a country revealed the need for careful evaluation. This study was designed and executed to collect experts' opinions on the evaluation steps, related indicators, and improvement strategies in trauma care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was based on a conventional content analysis approach. 2 focus group discussions (FGD) with 6 participants per FGD and 16 face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted to collect the required information (from September 2018 to early 2019). Participants were selected through the purposive sampling method. The experts' viewpoints were classified by the main and sub themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four basic themes extracted from the interviews and focus group discussions including, trauma care importance (sub-themes: the involved individuals' being young and productive and the effectiveness of trauma care); trauma care indicators (sub-themes: pre-hospital indicators, in-hospital indicators, and post-hospital indicators); stages of trauma care evaluation (sub-themes: evaluation prerequisites, finalization of indicators before the evaluation, determining evaluation time scope, determining evaluation dimensions, external and internal evaluation and use of evaluation results); trauma care improvement (sub-themes: balancing workload in trauma centers, enhancement of information system, considering extra-organizational dimensions in trauma care and empowerment of trauma care providers).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to experts' viewpoints, trauma is a very important issue, because it involves young people. They believed that having indicators covering all aspects of care assist health managers and policymakers to understand under-standard performance. These indicators should be used in the form of a specific evaluation program and related to Iran context. Besides, reforming macro policies, planning, development of infrastructures, and education was some recommendations of experts to improve trauma care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of injury & violence research\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"99-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8435083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of injury & violence research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1589\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of injury & violence research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5249/jivr.v13i2.1589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤是全世界死亡的主要原因之一。创伤患者病情危重,需要及时、充分、有组织的护理。在世界各地的服务中心,甚至在一个国家内,创伤护理的不同后果揭示了仔细评估的必要性。本研究旨在收集专家对创伤护理的评估步骤、相关指标和改进策略的意见。方法:本定性研究采用传统的含量分析方法。2018年9月至2019年初进行了2次焦点小组讨论(FGD),每个FGD有6名参与者,并进行了16次面对面深入访谈,以收集所需信息。通过有目的抽样法选择参与者。专家们的观点按主题和副主题分类。结果:从访谈和焦点小组讨论中提取的四个基本主题包括:创伤护理的重要性(副主题:涉及个体的年轻和生产能力以及创伤护理的有效性);创伤护理指标(分主题:院前指标、院内指标和院后指标);创伤护理评估阶段(分主题:评估先决条件、评估前指标的确定、评估时间范围的确定、评估维度的确定、外部和内部评估以及评估结果的使用);创伤护理的改进(分主题:平衡创伤中心的工作量,增强信息系统,考虑创伤护理的组织外维度和赋予创伤护理提供者权力)。结论:根据专家的观点,创伤是一个非常重要的问题,因为它涉及年轻人。他们认为,拥有涵盖护理各个方面的指标有助于卫生管理人员和政策制定者了解不达标的表现。这些指标应以具体评估方案的形式使用,并与伊朗的情况有关。此外,专家还建议从宏观政策、规划、基础设施建设、教育等方面进行改革,以改善创伤护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identifying indicators and evaluation steps with suggestions for improving trauma care in Iran: experts' perspective.

Identifying indicators and evaluation steps with suggestions for improving trauma care in Iran: experts' perspective.

Background: Trauma is one of the major causes of mortality across the world. Trauma patients have critical status and need timely, adequate, and organized care. The different consequences of trauma care among service centers around the world and even within a country revealed the need for careful evaluation. This study was designed and executed to collect experts' opinions on the evaluation steps, related indicators, and improvement strategies in trauma care.

Methods: This qualitative study was based on a conventional content analysis approach. 2 focus group discussions (FGD) with 6 participants per FGD and 16 face-to-face in-depth interviews were conducted to collect the required information (from September 2018 to early 2019). Participants were selected through the purposive sampling method. The experts' viewpoints were classified by the main and sub themes.

Results: Four basic themes extracted from the interviews and focus group discussions including, trauma care importance (sub-themes: the involved individuals' being young and productive and the effectiveness of trauma care); trauma care indicators (sub-themes: pre-hospital indicators, in-hospital indicators, and post-hospital indicators); stages of trauma care evaluation (sub-themes: evaluation prerequisites, finalization of indicators before the evaluation, determining evaluation time scope, determining evaluation dimensions, external and internal evaluation and use of evaluation results); trauma care improvement (sub-themes: balancing workload in trauma centers, enhancement of information system, considering extra-organizational dimensions in trauma care and empowerment of trauma care providers).

Conclusions: According to experts' viewpoints, trauma is a very important issue, because it involves young people. They believed that having indicators covering all aspects of care assist health managers and policymakers to understand under-standard performance. These indicators should be used in the form of a specific evaluation program and related to Iran context. Besides, reforming macro policies, planning, development of infrastructures, and education was some recommendations of experts to improve trauma care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信