脑卒中后过渡家庭准备评估的心理测量学特征。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Michelle Camicia, Barbara J Lutz, Jill G Joseph, Theresa A Harvath, Christiana M Drake, Brian R Theodore, Katherine K Kim
{"title":"脑卒中后过渡家庭准备评估的心理测量学特征。","authors":"Michelle Camicia,&nbsp;Barbara J Lutz,&nbsp;Jill G Joseph,&nbsp;Theresa A Harvath,&nbsp;Christiana M Drake,&nbsp;Brian R Theodore,&nbsp;Katherine K Kim","doi":"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home After Stroke (PATH-s), a novel instrument to assess stroke caregiver commitment and capacity. The PATH-s instrument can be obtained at www.rehabnurse.org/pathtool.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The design of this study is cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PATH-s, the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS), the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the Global Health Scale were self-reported from a convenience sample of caregiver-stroke survivor dyads (n = 183) during inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis revealed eight factors underlying the PATH-s structure. The PATH-s Cronbach's alpha of .90 demonstrated criterion-related validity with the PCS (r = .79, p < .01). Both the PATH-s and the PCS were negatively correlated with the Patient Health Questionnaire (r = -.26 and -.27, respectively; p < .01) and the Perceived Stress Scale (r = -.12 and -.15, respectively; p > .05) and positively correlated with the Global Health Scale (r = -.46 and .46, respectively; p < .01), indicating convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PATH-s demonstrates excellent internal consistency and satisfactory criterion-related and convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The PATH-s may be used to assess the risk/needs of caregivers over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":49631,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Nursing","volume":"46 2","pages":"113-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home After Stroke Instrument.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Camicia,&nbsp;Barbara J Lutz,&nbsp;Jill G Joseph,&nbsp;Theresa A Harvath,&nbsp;Christiana M Drake,&nbsp;Brian R Theodore,&nbsp;Katherine K Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home After Stroke (PATH-s), a novel instrument to assess stroke caregiver commitment and capacity. The PATH-s instrument can be obtained at www.rehabnurse.org/pathtool.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The design of this study is cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PATH-s, the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS), the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the Global Health Scale were self-reported from a convenience sample of caregiver-stroke survivor dyads (n = 183) during inpatient rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis revealed eight factors underlying the PATH-s structure. The PATH-s Cronbach's alpha of .90 demonstrated criterion-related validity with the PCS (r = .79, p < .01). Both the PATH-s and the PCS were negatively correlated with the Patient Health Questionnaire (r = -.26 and -.27, respectively; p < .01) and the Perceived Stress Scale (r = -.12 and -.15, respectively; p > .05) and positively correlated with the Global Health Scale (r = -.46 and .46, respectively; p < .01), indicating convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PATH-s demonstrates excellent internal consistency and satisfactory criterion-related and convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The PATH-s may be used to assess the risk/needs of caregivers over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Nursing\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"113-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000310\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估中风后过渡家庭准备评估(PATH-s)的心理测量特性,PATH-s是一种评估中风照顾者承诺和能力的新工具。PATH-s仪器可从www.rehabnurse.org/pathtool.Design:获得。本研究的设计是横断面的。方法:采用PATH-s、护理准备量表(PCS)、患者健康问卷、感知压力量表和全球健康量表(Global Health Scale),从住院康复期间护理者卒中幸存者二人组(n = 183)中自行报告。结果:探索性因子分析揭示了PATH-s结构的8个影响因素。PATH-s Cronbach's alpha值为0.90,证明了PCS与标准相关的效度(r = 0.79, p < 0.01)。PATH-s和PCS与患者健康问卷呈负相关(r = -)。26和-。27日分别;p < 0.01)和感知压力量表(r = -。12和-15日分别;p > 0.05),且与全球健康量表呈正相关(r = -)。分别为46和0.46;P < 0.01),表明趋同效度。结论:path - 5具有良好的内部一致性和满意的标准相关效度和收敛效度。临床相关性:path - 5可用于评估长期护理者的风险/需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Properties of the Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home After Stroke Instrument.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate psychometric properties of the Preparedness Assessment for the Transition Home After Stroke (PATH-s), a novel instrument to assess stroke caregiver commitment and capacity. The PATH-s instrument can be obtained at www.rehabnurse.org/pathtool.

Design: The design of this study is cross-sectional.

Methods: The PATH-s, the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale (PCS), the Patient Health Questionnaire, the Perceived Stress Scale, and the Global Health Scale were self-reported from a convenience sample of caregiver-stroke survivor dyads (n = 183) during inpatient rehabilitation.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed eight factors underlying the PATH-s structure. The PATH-s Cronbach's alpha of .90 demonstrated criterion-related validity with the PCS (r = .79, p < .01). Both the PATH-s and the PCS were negatively correlated with the Patient Health Questionnaire (r = -.26 and -.27, respectively; p < .01) and the Perceived Stress Scale (r = -.12 and -.15, respectively; p > .05) and positively correlated with the Global Health Scale (r = -.46 and .46, respectively; p < .01), indicating convergent validity.

Conclusions: The PATH-s demonstrates excellent internal consistency and satisfactory criterion-related and convergent validity.

Clinical relevance: The PATH-s may be used to assess the risk/needs of caregivers over time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation Nursing
Rehabilitation Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Nursing is a refereed, award-winning publication and is the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. Its purpose is to provide rehabilitation professionals with high-quality articles with a primary focus on rehabilitation nursing. Topics range from administration and research to education and clinical topics, and nursing perspectives, with continuing education opportunities in every issue. Articles range from administration and research to education and clinical topics; nursing perspectives, resource reviews, and product information; and continuing education opportunities in every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信