脑膜瘤脑侵犯的预后意义:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Tumor Pathology Pub Date : 2021-04-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-06 DOI:10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y
Satoshi Nakasu, Yoko Nakasu
{"title":"脑膜瘤脑侵犯的预后意义:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Satoshi Nakasu,&nbsp;Yoko Nakasu","doi":"10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The WHO 2016 classification introduced brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma (GIIM). We systematically reviewed studies published after 2000 and performed a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of the hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) between brain-invasive and noninvasive meningiomas. In five studies that included both benign and higher-grade meningiomas, brain invasion was a significant risk factor for recurrence (HR = 2.45, p = 0.0004). However, in 3 studies comparing \"brain-invasive meningioma with otherwise benign histology (BIOB)\" with grade I meningioma, brain invasion was not a significant predictor of PFS (HR = 1.49, p = 0.23). Among GIIM per the WHO 2000 criteria, brain invasion was a significant predictor of shorter PFS than noninvasive GIIM (HR = 3.40, p = 0.001) but not per the WHO 2016 criteria (HR 1.13, p = 0.54), as the latter includes BIOB. Meta-regression analysis of seven studies of grade II meningioma showed that more frequent BIOB was associated with lower HRs (p < 0.0001). Hence, there is no rationale for brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma, although almost all studies were retrospective and exhibited highly heterogeneous HRs due to differences in brain-tumor interface data availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9226,"journal":{"name":"Brain Tumor Pathology","volume":"38 2","pages":"81-95"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic significance of brain invasion in meningiomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Nakasu,&nbsp;Yoko Nakasu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The WHO 2016 classification introduced brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma (GIIM). We systematically reviewed studies published after 2000 and performed a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of the hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) between brain-invasive and noninvasive meningiomas. In five studies that included both benign and higher-grade meningiomas, brain invasion was a significant risk factor for recurrence (HR = 2.45, p = 0.0004). However, in 3 studies comparing \\\"brain-invasive meningioma with otherwise benign histology (BIOB)\\\" with grade I meningioma, brain invasion was not a significant predictor of PFS (HR = 1.49, p = 0.23). Among GIIM per the WHO 2000 criteria, brain invasion was a significant predictor of shorter PFS than noninvasive GIIM (HR = 3.40, p = 0.001) but not per the WHO 2016 criteria (HR 1.13, p = 0.54), as the latter includes BIOB. Meta-regression analysis of seven studies of grade II meningioma showed that more frequent BIOB was associated with lower HRs (p < 0.0001). Hence, there is no rationale for brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma, although almost all studies were retrospective and exhibited highly heterogeneous HRs due to differences in brain-tumor interface data availability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Tumor Pathology\",\"volume\":\"38 2\",\"pages\":\"81-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Tumor Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Tumor Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-020-00390-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

世卫组织2016年的分类将脑侵犯作为II级脑膜瘤(GIIM)的独立标准。我们系统地回顾了2000年以后发表的研究,并对脑浸润性和非浸润性脑膜瘤的无进展生存(PFS)的风险比(hr)进行了符合prisma标准的荟萃分析。在包括良性和高级别脑膜瘤的5项研究中,脑浸润是复发的重要危险因素(HR = 2.45, p = 0.0004)。然而,在3项比较“具有其他良性组织学的脑浸润性脑膜瘤(BIOB)”与一级脑膜瘤的研究中,脑浸润并不是PFS的显著预测因子(HR = 1.49, p = 0.23)。在WHO 2000标准的GIIM中,脑侵犯是比无创GIIM更短PFS的显著预测因子(HR = 3.40, p = 0.001),但不是WHO 2016标准的预测因子(HR 1.13, p = 0.54),因为后者包括BIOB。7项II级脑膜瘤研究的荟萃回归分析显示,更频繁的BIOB与较低的hr相关
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic significance of brain invasion in meningiomas: systematic review and meta-analysis.

The WHO 2016 classification introduced brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma (GIIM). We systematically reviewed studies published after 2000 and performed a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of the hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) between brain-invasive and noninvasive meningiomas. In five studies that included both benign and higher-grade meningiomas, brain invasion was a significant risk factor for recurrence (HR = 2.45, p = 0.0004). However, in 3 studies comparing "brain-invasive meningioma with otherwise benign histology (BIOB)" with grade I meningioma, brain invasion was not a significant predictor of PFS (HR = 1.49, p = 0.23). Among GIIM per the WHO 2000 criteria, brain invasion was a significant predictor of shorter PFS than noninvasive GIIM (HR = 3.40, p = 0.001) but not per the WHO 2016 criteria (HR 1.13, p = 0.54), as the latter includes BIOB. Meta-regression analysis of seven studies of grade II meningioma showed that more frequent BIOB was associated with lower HRs (p < 0.0001). Hence, there is no rationale for brain invasion as a standalone criterion for grade II meningioma, although almost all studies were retrospective and exhibited highly heterogeneous HRs due to differences in brain-tumor interface data availability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Tumor Pathology
Brain Tumor Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
30
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Tumor Pathology is the official journal of the Japan Society of Brain Tumor Pathology. This international journal documents the latest research and topical debate in all clinical and experimental fields relating to brain tumors, especially brain tumor pathology. The journal has been published since 1983 and has been recognized worldwide as a unique journal of high quality. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts from any country. Membership in the society is not a prerequisite for submission. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, rapid short communications, instructional lectures, review articles, letters to the editor, and topics.Review articles and Topics may be recommended at the annual meeting of the Japan Society of Brain Tumor Pathology. All contributions should be aimed at promoting international scientific collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信