脊柱裂患者性生活的评估:一项儿科泌尿科医生的调查

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Guilherme Lang Motta , Anna Bujons , Yesica Quiróz , Erika Llorens , Tiago Elias Rosito
{"title":"脊柱裂患者性生活的评估:一项儿科泌尿科医生的调查","authors":"Guilherme Lang Motta ,&nbsp;Anna Bujons ,&nbsp;Yesica Quiróz ,&nbsp;Erika Llorens ,&nbsp;Tiago Elias Rosito","doi":"10.1016/j.androl.2020.05.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the status of the sexual education approach with spina bifida (SB) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>An online survey was sent to 223 pediatric urologists from Latin countries, all contacted using email or mobile messaging software. There were 12 questions about participants’ demographic characteristics and SB-specific care topics. Data was collected from January 2019 to January 2020. Checklist for reporting results of internet e-survey (CHERRIES) guidelines were followed to ensure the quality of this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We received 101 valid answers from participants practicing in seven different countries. Among these, 98.4% confirmed that sexuality in the SB population is considered relevant, nevertheless it is only evaluated by 62.5%. Transitional urologists discuss sexuality more often than those whose practice consists solely of pediatric patients (70% vs. 50%). Basic surgeon training (urologist vs. pediatric surgeon), age, part or full-time pediatric urology practice and country of participants were of no statistically different influence inrates of approach to sexuality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study demonstrates that pediatric urologists are insufficiently addressing sexuality in SB patients. Those who practise transitional urology show higher rates of approach to sexuality with SB patients, which suggests this is an important model of care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49129,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional De Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of sexual life in spina bifida patients: A survey among pediatric urologists\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Lang Motta ,&nbsp;Anna Bujons ,&nbsp;Yesica Quiróz ,&nbsp;Erika Llorens ,&nbsp;Tiago Elias Rosito\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.androl.2020.05.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the status of the sexual education approach with spina bifida (SB) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>An online survey was sent to 223 pediatric urologists from Latin countries, all contacted using email or mobile messaging software. There were 12 questions about participants’ demographic characteristics and SB-specific care topics. Data was collected from January 2019 to January 2020. Checklist for reporting results of internet e-survey (CHERRIES) guidelines were followed to ensure the quality of this study.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We received 101 valid answers from participants practicing in seven different countries. Among these, 98.4% confirmed that sexuality in the SB population is considered relevant, nevertheless it is only evaluated by 62.5%. Transitional urologists discuss sexuality more often than those whose practice consists solely of pediatric patients (70% vs. 50%). Basic surgeon training (urologist vs. pediatric surgeon), age, part or full-time pediatric urology practice and country of participants were of no statistically different influence inrates of approach to sexuality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study demonstrates that pediatric urologists are insufficiently addressing sexuality in SB patients. Those who practise transitional urology show higher rates of approach to sexuality with SB patients, which suggests this is an important model of care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Internacional De Andrologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Internacional De Andrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1698031X20300716\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional De Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1698031X20300716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的评价性教育方法在脊柱裂患者中的应用现状。资料与方法一项在线调查向来自拉丁国家的223名儿科泌尿科医生发送,所有人都通过电子邮件或移动消息软件联系。共有12个问题是关于参与者的人口学特征和特定的sb护理主题。数据收集时间为2019年1月至2020年1月。为了确保本研究的质量,我们遵循了网络电子调查(樱桃)报告结果指南清单。结果我们收到了来自7个不同国家的参与者的101份有效答案。其中,98.4%的人确认SB人群的性取向被认为是相关的,但只有62.5%的人对此进行了评估。过渡泌尿科医生比那些只治疗儿科患者的医生更常讨论性问题(70%对50%)。基础外科医生培训(泌尿科医生与儿科外科医生)、年龄、部分或全职儿科泌尿外科实践以及参与者的国家对性接近率的影响没有统计学差异。结论:我们的研究表明儿科泌尿科医生对SB患者的性取向问题处理得不够充分。那些从事过渡性泌尿外科的人对SB患者的性行为表现出更高的接近率,这表明这是一种重要的护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of sexual life in spina bifida patients: A survey among pediatric urologists

Objective

To assess the status of the sexual education approach with spina bifida (SB) patients.

Materials and methods

An online survey was sent to 223 pediatric urologists from Latin countries, all contacted using email or mobile messaging software. There were 12 questions about participants’ demographic characteristics and SB-specific care topics. Data was collected from January 2019 to January 2020. Checklist for reporting results of internet e-survey (CHERRIES) guidelines were followed to ensure the quality of this study.

Results

We received 101 valid answers from participants practicing in seven different countries. Among these, 98.4% confirmed that sexuality in the SB population is considered relevant, nevertheless it is only evaluated by 62.5%. Transitional urologists discuss sexuality more often than those whose practice consists solely of pediatric patients (70% vs. 50%). Basic surgeon training (urologist vs. pediatric surgeon), age, part or full-time pediatric urology practice and country of participants were of no statistically different influence inrates of approach to sexuality.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that pediatric urologists are insufficiently addressing sexuality in SB patients. Those who practise transitional urology show higher rates of approach to sexuality with SB patients, which suggests this is an important model of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista Internacional de Andrología es la revista oficial de la Asociación Española de Andrología, Medicina Sexual y Reproductiva (ASESA), la Sociedade Portuguesa de Ardrologia, la Sociedad Argentina de Andrología (SAA), la Asociación Iberoamericana de Sociedades de Andrología (ANDRO), y la Federación Española de Sociedades de Sexología. La revista publicada trimestralmente es revisada por pares y es líder en el la especialidad y en español y portugués. Recientemente también publica artículos en inglés. El objetivo de la revista es principalmente la promoción del conocimiento y la educación médica continua, con un enfoque especial en el público español y latinoamericano, a través de la publicación de las contribuciones importantes de la investigación en el campo. Todos los miembros de las sociedades antes mencionadas reciben la revista y otros suscriptores individuales e institucionales de España, Portugal y América Latina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信