大型学术医疗中心麻醉学大查房的讲者性别代表。

Molly B Kraus, Bhargavi Gali, Grace W Cunningham, Susan M Moeschler, Phillip J Schulte, Madeline Q Johnson, Emily E Sharpe
{"title":"大型学术医疗中心麻醉学大查房的讲者性别代表。","authors":"Molly B Kraus,&nbsp;Bhargavi Gali,&nbsp;Grace W Cunningham,&nbsp;Susan M Moeschler,&nbsp;Phillip J Schulte,&nbsp;Madeline Q Johnson,&nbsp;Emily E Sharpe","doi":"10.46374/volxxii-issue4-sharpe","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invited speakerships, such as speaking at grand rounds, are part of the pathway to promotion in academic medicine. This project sought to evaluate if the gender of invited grand rounds speakers at a major academic institution were distributed as expected based on the specialty workforce.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Archived lists of speakers for grand rounds for the Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology were obtained from 2007 through 2018. The Cochran-Armitage test and logistic regression models were used to analyze the change in proportion of invited women speakers over time. One-sample proportion tests were conducted to compare the proportion of women speakers to the expected percentage of available women speakers based on gender data from national organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 122 invited external speakers, 28 (23%) were women. Men invited 104/122 (85.2%) of all the speakers, of which 21 (20.2%) were women speakers. There was not significant evidence the proportion of women speakers increased over time (<i>P</i> = .29). Women speakers comprised a lower proportion of external invited speakers compared to the proportion of women in the academic anesthesia workforce; however, this association was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .07). The percentage of new residents that were female increased over this time period (<i>P</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The percentage of women invited to be grand rounds speakers did not increase over the study period. Intentional measures should be instituted to increase the proportion of women grand rounds speakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"22 4","pages":"E654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792565/pdf/i2333-0406-22-4-sharpe.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speaker Gender Representation for Anesthesiology Grand Rounds at a Large Academic Medical Center.\",\"authors\":\"Molly B Kraus,&nbsp;Bhargavi Gali,&nbsp;Grace W Cunningham,&nbsp;Susan M Moeschler,&nbsp;Phillip J Schulte,&nbsp;Madeline Q Johnson,&nbsp;Emily E Sharpe\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/volxxii-issue4-sharpe\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Invited speakerships, such as speaking at grand rounds, are part of the pathway to promotion in academic medicine. This project sought to evaluate if the gender of invited grand rounds speakers at a major academic institution were distributed as expected based on the specialty workforce.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Archived lists of speakers for grand rounds for the Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology were obtained from 2007 through 2018. The Cochran-Armitage test and logistic regression models were used to analyze the change in proportion of invited women speakers over time. One-sample proportion tests were conducted to compare the proportion of women speakers to the expected percentage of available women speakers based on gender data from national organizations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 122 invited external speakers, 28 (23%) were women. Men invited 104/122 (85.2%) of all the speakers, of which 21 (20.2%) were women speakers. There was not significant evidence the proportion of women speakers increased over time (<i>P</i> = .29). Women speakers comprised a lower proportion of external invited speakers compared to the proportion of women in the academic anesthesia workforce; however, this association was not statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .07). The percentage of new residents that were female increased over this time period (<i>P</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The percentage of women invited to be grand rounds speakers did not increase over the study period. Intentional measures should be instituted to increase the proportion of women grand rounds speakers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"E654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7792565/pdf/i2333-0406-22-4-sharpe.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii-issue4-sharpe\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxii-issue4-sharpe","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:受邀演讲,如在大查房演讲,是学术医学提升途径的一部分。该项目旨在评估一个主要学术机构受邀的圆桌会议演讲者的性别是否按照预期的专业劳动力分配。材料和方法:从2007年到2018年,获得了梅奥诊所麻醉科大查房的存档演讲者名单。采用Cochran-Armitage检验和logistic回归模型分析受邀女性演讲者比例随时间的变化。根据国家组织提供的性别数据,进行了单样本比例测试,以比较妇女发言者的比例与现有妇女发言者的预期百分比。结果:在122位受邀的外部演讲者中,有28位(23%)是女性。男性邀请了104/122(85.2%)的演讲者,其中女性演讲者21人(20.2%)。没有显著的证据表明女性说话者的比例随着时间的推移而增加(P = 0.29)。与学术麻醉工作人员中女性的比例相比,女性演讲者在外部邀请演讲者中所占比例较低;然而,这种关联没有统计学意义(P = .07)。在此期间,女性新居民的比例有所增加(P = .001)。讨论:在研究期间,受邀参加圆桌会议的女性演讲者的比例并没有增加。应采取有意的措施,增加妇女在圆桌会议上发言的比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Speaker Gender Representation for Anesthesiology Grand Rounds at a Large Academic Medical Center.

Background: Invited speakerships, such as speaking at grand rounds, are part of the pathway to promotion in academic medicine. This project sought to evaluate if the gender of invited grand rounds speakers at a major academic institution were distributed as expected based on the specialty workforce.

Materials and methods: Archived lists of speakers for grand rounds for the Mayo Clinic Department of Anesthesiology were obtained from 2007 through 2018. The Cochran-Armitage test and logistic regression models were used to analyze the change in proportion of invited women speakers over time. One-sample proportion tests were conducted to compare the proportion of women speakers to the expected percentage of available women speakers based on gender data from national organizations.

Results: Of the 122 invited external speakers, 28 (23%) were women. Men invited 104/122 (85.2%) of all the speakers, of which 21 (20.2%) were women speakers. There was not significant evidence the proportion of women speakers increased over time (P = .29). Women speakers comprised a lower proportion of external invited speakers compared to the proportion of women in the academic anesthesia workforce; however, this association was not statistically significant (P = .07). The percentage of new residents that were female increased over this time period (P = .001).

Discussion: The percentage of women invited to be grand rounds speakers did not increase over the study period. Intentional measures should be instituted to increase the proportion of women grand rounds speakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信