{"title":"包容与排斥:获得辅助生殖技术的比较公共政策(法国/美国)","authors":"Jennifer Merchant","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article examines what French and American societies mean by the principle of personal autonomy/‘right to privacy’ and the concept of solidarity/‘the best interest of the society at large’. It will attempt to show how these two countries translate these concepts into different public policies, more specifically in the field of access to sexual and reproductive rights of women and men. In order to better highlight these differences, I observe what citizens actually experience on the ground, and in so doing, it becomes clear that each country does not fully meet the principles they purport to defend.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":"11 ","pages":"Pages 18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.004","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusion, exclusion: comparative public policy (France/USA) in access to assisted reproductive technology\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Merchant\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article examines what French and American societies mean by the principle of personal autonomy/‘right to privacy’ and the concept of solidarity/‘the best interest of the society at large’. It will attempt to show how these two countries translate these concepts into different public policies, more specifically in the field of access to sexual and reproductive rights of women and men. In order to better highlight these differences, I observe what citizens actually experience on the ground, and in so doing, it becomes clear that each country does not fully meet the principles they purport to defend.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 18-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.004\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661820300174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405661820300174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inclusion, exclusion: comparative public policy (France/USA) in access to assisted reproductive technology
This article examines what French and American societies mean by the principle of personal autonomy/‘right to privacy’ and the concept of solidarity/‘the best interest of the society at large’. It will attempt to show how these two countries translate these concepts into different public policies, more specifically in the field of access to sexual and reproductive rights of women and men. In order to better highlight these differences, I observe what citizens actually experience on the ground, and in so doing, it becomes clear that each country does not fully meet the principles they purport to defend.
期刊介绍:
RBMS is a new journal dedicated to interdisciplinary discussion and debate of the rapidly expanding field of reproductive biomedicine, particularly all of its many societal and cultural implications. It is intended to bring to attention new research in the social sciences, arts and humanities on human reproduction, new reproductive technologies, and related areas such as human embryonic stem cell derivation. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, policy makers, academics and patients.