共享患者在医院网络中的分散与较低的护理效率有关。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Jordan Everson, Julia R Adler-Milstein, John M Hollingsworth, Shoou-Yih D Lee
{"title":"共享患者在医院网络中的分散与较低的护理效率有关。","authors":"Jordan Everson,&nbsp;Julia R Adler-Milstein,&nbsp;John M Hollingsworth,&nbsp;Shoou-Yih D Lee","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing recognition that health care providers are embedded in networks formed by the movement of patients between providers. However, the structure of such networks and its impact on health care are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We examined the level of dispersion of patient-sharing networks across U.S. hospitals and its association with three measures of care delivered by hospitals that were likely to relate to coordination.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We used data derived from 2016 Medicare Fee-for-Service claims to measure the volume of patients that hospitals treated in common. We then calculated a measure of dispersion for each hospital based on how those patients were concentrated in outside hospitals. Using this measure, we created multivariate regression models to estimate the relationship between network dispersion, Medicare spending per beneficiary, readmission rates, and emergency department (ED) throughput rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In multivariate analysis, we found that hospitals with more dispersed networks (those with many low-volume patient-sharing relationships) had higher spending but not greater readmission rates or slower ED throughput. Among hospitals with fewer resources, greater dispersion related to greater readmission rates and slower ED throughput. Holding an individual hospital's dispersion constant, the level of dispersion of other hospitals in the hospital's network was also related to these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dispersed interhospital networks pose a challenge to coordination for patients who are treated at multiple hospitals. These findings indicate that the patient-sharing network structure may be an overlooked factor that shapes how health care organizations deliver care.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Hospital leaders and hospital-based clinicians should consider how the structure of relationships with other hospitals influences the coordination of patient care. Effective management of this broad network may lead to important strategic partnerships.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"47 2","pages":"88-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189658/pdf/nihms-1694544.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dispersion in the hospital network of shared patients is associated with less efficient care.\",\"authors\":\"Jordan Everson,&nbsp;Julia R Adler-Milstein,&nbsp;John M Hollingsworth,&nbsp;Shoou-Yih D Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is growing recognition that health care providers are embedded in networks formed by the movement of patients between providers. However, the structure of such networks and its impact on health care are poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We examined the level of dispersion of patient-sharing networks across U.S. hospitals and its association with three measures of care delivered by hospitals that were likely to relate to coordination.</p><p><strong>Methodology/approach: </strong>We used data derived from 2016 Medicare Fee-for-Service claims to measure the volume of patients that hospitals treated in common. We then calculated a measure of dispersion for each hospital based on how those patients were concentrated in outside hospitals. Using this measure, we created multivariate regression models to estimate the relationship between network dispersion, Medicare spending per beneficiary, readmission rates, and emergency department (ED) throughput rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In multivariate analysis, we found that hospitals with more dispersed networks (those with many low-volume patient-sharing relationships) had higher spending but not greater readmission rates or slower ED throughput. Among hospitals with fewer resources, greater dispersion related to greater readmission rates and slower ED throughput. Holding an individual hospital's dispersion constant, the level of dispersion of other hospitals in the hospital's network was also related to these outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dispersed interhospital networks pose a challenge to coordination for patients who are treated at multiple hospitals. These findings indicate that the patient-sharing network structure may be an overlooked factor that shapes how health care organizations deliver care.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Hospital leaders and hospital-based clinicians should consider how the structure of relationships with other hospitals influences the coordination of patient care. Effective management of this broad network may lead to important strategic partnerships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"volume\":\"47 2\",\"pages\":\"88-99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8189658/pdf/nihms-1694544.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000295\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:越来越多的人认识到,卫生保健提供者被嵌入到由患者在提供者之间流动形成的网络中。然而,人们对这种网络的结构及其对卫生保健的影响知之甚少。目的:我们研究了美国医院患者共享网络的分散水平及其与医院提供的可能与协调有关的三种护理措施的关系。方法/方法:我们使用来自2016年医疗保险按服务收费索赔的数据来衡量医院共同治疗的患者数量。然后,我们根据这些患者在医院外集中的情况,计算出每家医院的离散度。使用这一措施,我们创建了多元回归模型来估计网络分散、每位受益人医疗保险支出、再入院率和急诊科(ED)吞吐率之间的关系。结果:在多变量分析中,我们发现网络更分散的医院(那些有许多小容量患者共享关系的医院)有更高的支出,但没有更高的再入院率或更慢的急诊科吞吐量。在资源较少的医院中,更大的分散与更高的再入院率和更慢的急诊科吞吐量有关。保持单个医院的分散不变,医院网络中其他医院的分散水平也与这些结果相关。结论:分散的医院间网络对在多家医院治疗的患者的协调提出了挑战。这些发现表明,患者共享网络结构可能是一个被忽视的因素,影响医疗机构如何提供护理。实践启示:医院领导和以医院为基础的临床医生应该考虑与其他医院的关系结构如何影响患者护理的协调。对这一广泛网络的有效管理可能导致重要的战略伙伴关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dispersion in the hospital network of shared patients is associated with less efficient care.

Dispersion in the hospital network of shared patients is associated with less efficient care.

Background: There is growing recognition that health care providers are embedded in networks formed by the movement of patients between providers. However, the structure of such networks and its impact on health care are poorly understood.

Purpose: We examined the level of dispersion of patient-sharing networks across U.S. hospitals and its association with three measures of care delivered by hospitals that were likely to relate to coordination.

Methodology/approach: We used data derived from 2016 Medicare Fee-for-Service claims to measure the volume of patients that hospitals treated in common. We then calculated a measure of dispersion for each hospital based on how those patients were concentrated in outside hospitals. Using this measure, we created multivariate regression models to estimate the relationship between network dispersion, Medicare spending per beneficiary, readmission rates, and emergency department (ED) throughput rates.

Results: In multivariate analysis, we found that hospitals with more dispersed networks (those with many low-volume patient-sharing relationships) had higher spending but not greater readmission rates or slower ED throughput. Among hospitals with fewer resources, greater dispersion related to greater readmission rates and slower ED throughput. Holding an individual hospital's dispersion constant, the level of dispersion of other hospitals in the hospital's network was also related to these outcomes.

Conclusion: Dispersed interhospital networks pose a challenge to coordination for patients who are treated at multiple hospitals. These findings indicate that the patient-sharing network structure may be an overlooked factor that shapes how health care organizations deliver care.

Practice implications: Hospital leaders and hospital-based clinicians should consider how the structure of relationships with other hospitals influences the coordination of patient care. Effective management of this broad network may lead to important strategic partnerships.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信