意识经验理论的标准应该关注机制的解释力，而不是功能对等。

IF 2 4区医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES

Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-18 DOI:10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470

Johannes J Fahrenfort, Simon van Gaal

{"title":"意识经验理论的标准应该关注机制的解释力，而不是功能对等。","authors":"Johannes J Fahrenfort, Simon van Gaal","doi":"10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Doerig and colleagues put forward the notion that we need hard and theory-neutral criteria by which to arbitrate between empirical (mechanistic) theories of consciousness. However, most of the criteria that they propose are not theory neutral because they focus on functional equivalence between systems. Because empirical theories of consciousness are mechanistic rather than functionalist, we think these criteria are not helpful when arbitrating between them.","PeriodicalId":10413,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criteria for empirical theories of consciousness should focus on the explanatory power of mechanisms, not on functional equivalence.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes J Fahrenfort, Simon van Gaal\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Doerig and colleagues put forward the notion that we need hard and theory-neutral criteria by which to arbitrate between empirical (mechanistic) theories of consciousness. However, most of the criteria that they propose are not theory neutral because they focus on functional equivalence between systems. Because empirical theories of consciousness are mechanistic rather than functionalist, we think these criteria are not helpful when arbitrating between them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/11/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1838470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

Doerig和他的同事们提出了这样一个观点，即我们需要硬性的、理论中立的标准来在经验主义(机械论)的意识理论之间进行仲裁。然而，他们提出的大多数标准都不是理论中立的，因为他们关注的是系统之间的功能等价。因为意识的经验理论是机械论的而不是功能论的，我们认为这些标准在它们之间进行仲裁时没有帮助。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Criteria for empirical theories of consciousness should focus on the explanatory power of mechanisms, not on functional equivalence.

Doerig and colleagues put forward the notion that we need hard and theory-neutral criteria by which to arbitrate between empirical (mechanistic) theories of consciousness. However, most of the criteria that they propose are not theory neutral because they focus on functional equivalence between systems. Because empirical theories of consciousness are mechanistic rather than functionalist, we think these criteria are not helpful when arbitrating between them.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cognitive Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Cognitive Neuroscience publishes high quality discussion papers and empirical papers on any topic in the field of cognitive neuroscience including perception, attention, memory, language, action, social cognition, and executive function. The journal covers findings based on a variety of techniques such as fMRI, ERPs, MEG, TMS, and focal lesion studies. Contributions that employ or discuss multiple techniques to shed light on the spatial-temporal brain mechanisms underlying a cognitive process are encouraged.