[前磨牙拔牙正畸治疗的咬合质量和长期稳定性:系统综述]。

Q4 Medicine
Ameni Chok, Ines Dallel, Moncef Ommezine, Samir Tobji, Adel Ben Amor
{"title":"[前磨牙拔牙正畸治疗的咬合质量和长期稳定性:系统综述]。","authors":"Ameni Chok,&nbsp;Ines Dallel,&nbsp;Moncef Ommezine,&nbsp;Samir Tobji,&nbsp;Adel Ben Amor","doi":"10.1684/orthodfr.2020.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies about orthodontic relapse have always confirmed the occurrence of some occlusal changes after orthodontic treatment. The reopening of premolar extraction spaces is one of the most frequently observed movements and would have several origins : gingival folds, root proximities, muscular imbalance... and particularly unstable end of treatment occlusion. The aim of this systematic review was to study the correlation between quality of the occlusal finishing after orthodontic treatment with premolars extraction and reopening of extraction spaces. The review was undertaken according to PRISMA recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook through an electronic consultation of the PubMed database to identify clinical trials that responded to the PICO research question. Five studies met all the inclusion criteria. Three studies used the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) in assessing the quality of the occlusal finishing. For two of these studies, there is a correlation between poor occlusal finishing and reopening of extraction space. For the other three studies, no cause-and-effect relationship between these two factors has been proven. The divergence of the published results was explained by the fact that the stability of an orthodontic treatment depends on multiple parameters. Further controlled clinical studies should be conducted to objectively evaluate, without interfering with other parameters, the role of occlusal finishing in the long-term stability of orthodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35927,"journal":{"name":"L'' Orthodontie française","volume":"91 3","pages":"191-195"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Quality of finishing occlusion and long-term stability of orthodontic treatments with premolar extractions : A systematic review].\",\"authors\":\"Ameni Chok,&nbsp;Ines Dallel,&nbsp;Moncef Ommezine,&nbsp;Samir Tobji,&nbsp;Adel Ben Amor\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/orthodfr.2020.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies about orthodontic relapse have always confirmed the occurrence of some occlusal changes after orthodontic treatment. The reopening of premolar extraction spaces is one of the most frequently observed movements and would have several origins : gingival folds, root proximities, muscular imbalance... and particularly unstable end of treatment occlusion. The aim of this systematic review was to study the correlation between quality of the occlusal finishing after orthodontic treatment with premolars extraction and reopening of extraction spaces. The review was undertaken according to PRISMA recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook through an electronic consultation of the PubMed database to identify clinical trials that responded to the PICO research question. Five studies met all the inclusion criteria. Three studies used the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) in assessing the quality of the occlusal finishing. For two of these studies, there is a correlation between poor occlusal finishing and reopening of extraction space. For the other three studies, no cause-and-effect relationship between these two factors has been proven. The divergence of the published results was explained by the fact that the stability of an orthodontic treatment depends on multiple parameters. Further controlled clinical studies should be conducted to objectively evaluate, without interfering with other parameters, the role of occlusal finishing in the long-term stability of orthodontic treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"volume\":\"91 3\",\"pages\":\"191-195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L'' Orthodontie française\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2020.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L'' Orthodontie française","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/orthodfr.2020.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于正畸复发的研究一直证实正畸治疗后会发生一些咬合改变。前磨牙拔牙间隙重新打开是最常见的运动之一,可能有几种原因:牙龈褶皱、牙根靠近、肌肉不平衡……尤其是不稳定的治疗结束时闭塞。本系统综述的目的是研究拔除前磨牙正畸治疗后咬合整理质量与拔除间隙开放的关系。该综述是根据《Cochrane手册》中的PRISMA建议,通过PubMed数据库的电子咨询进行的,以确定对PICO研究问题有反应的临床试验。5项研究符合所有纳入标准。有3项研究采用同行评价法(PAR)评价咬合整理质量。在其中的两项研究中,咬合整理不良与拔牙间隙重新开放之间存在相关性。对于其他三项研究,这两个因素之间没有因果关系。发表结果的分歧是由正畸治疗的稳定性取决于多个参数这一事实来解释的。需要进一步开展临床对照研究,在不干扰其他参数的情况下,客观评价咬合整理对正畸治疗长期稳定性的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Quality of finishing occlusion and long-term stability of orthodontic treatments with premolar extractions : A systematic review].

Studies about orthodontic relapse have always confirmed the occurrence of some occlusal changes after orthodontic treatment. The reopening of premolar extraction spaces is one of the most frequently observed movements and would have several origins : gingival folds, root proximities, muscular imbalance... and particularly unstable end of treatment occlusion. The aim of this systematic review was to study the correlation between quality of the occlusal finishing after orthodontic treatment with premolars extraction and reopening of extraction spaces. The review was undertaken according to PRISMA recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook through an electronic consultation of the PubMed database to identify clinical trials that responded to the PICO research question. Five studies met all the inclusion criteria. Three studies used the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) in assessing the quality of the occlusal finishing. For two of these studies, there is a correlation between poor occlusal finishing and reopening of extraction space. For the other three studies, no cause-and-effect relationship between these two factors has been proven. The divergence of the published results was explained by the fact that the stability of an orthodontic treatment depends on multiple parameters. Further controlled clinical studies should be conducted to objectively evaluate, without interfering with other parameters, the role of occlusal finishing in the long-term stability of orthodontic treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
L'' Orthodontie française
L'' Orthodontie française Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: L’Orthodontie Française, organe officiel de communication de la Société Française d’Orthopédie Dento-Faciale, est un journal scientifique de référence depuis 1921, de diffusion internationale, indexé à Medline et référencé à l’Index Medicus et à Bibliodent. Le journal a pour vocation d’accueillir les travaux des membres de la SFODF, des conférenciers ayant communiqué lors des congrès de la Société, ou de tout travail soumis à l’approbation de son comité de rédaction, traitant de l’orthopédie dento-faciale ou de tout sujet en rapport avec cette discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信