2018年印度尼西亚爪哇岛人工流产发生率估算。

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences
Margaret M Giorgio, Budi Utomo, Nugroho Soeharno, Riznawaty Imma Aryanty, Besral, Melissa Stillman, Jesse Philbin, Susheela Singh, Gilda Sedgh
{"title":"2018年印度尼西亚爪哇岛人工流产发生率估算。","authors":"Margaret M Giorgio,&nbsp;Budi Utomo,&nbsp;Nugroho Soeharno,&nbsp;Riznawaty Imma Aryanty,&nbsp;Besral,&nbsp;Melissa Stillman,&nbsp;Jesse Philbin,&nbsp;Susheela Singh,&nbsp;Gilda Sedgh","doi":"10.1363/46e0220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In Indonesia, maternal mortality is high and abortion is restricted. Reliable information on induced abortion is needed; however, the difficulty of measuring abortion in settings where it is legally restricted and highly stigmatized calls for innovation in approaches to measuring abortion incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data were from three original surveys conducted in Java among health facilities, knowledgeable informants and women aged 15-49, fielded in April 2018-January 2019. Two methods were used to estimate the one-year induced abortion incidence rate in Java: the standard Abortion Incidence Complications Method (AICM) and a modified AICM. Each method was evaluated on the basis of data quality, and what is known about sexual and reproductive health indicators related to abortion rates, to determine which performed best in measuring abortion incidence in Java.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimates of complications resulting from induced abortion from knowledgeable informants and the women differed substantially. The modified AICM produced an estimate of 42.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-49, while the standard AICM estimate was lower (25.8 per 1,000). A comparison of the distribution of abortion methods used revealed that knowledgeable informants believed abortion was less safe than indicated by women's reports of their own experiences. Therefore, the standard AICM likely underestimates abortion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified AICM performed better than the standard AICM and indicates that abortion is common in Java. Increased access to contraceptives and high-quality postabortion care is needed. Future research should investigate the safety of abortion, especially with respect to self-managed abortion.</p>","PeriodicalId":46940,"journal":{"name":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":"211-222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the Incidence of Induced Abortion in Java, Indonesia, 2018.\",\"authors\":\"Margaret M Giorgio,&nbsp;Budi Utomo,&nbsp;Nugroho Soeharno,&nbsp;Riznawaty Imma Aryanty,&nbsp;Besral,&nbsp;Melissa Stillman,&nbsp;Jesse Philbin,&nbsp;Susheela Singh,&nbsp;Gilda Sedgh\",\"doi\":\"10.1363/46e0220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>In Indonesia, maternal mortality is high and abortion is restricted. Reliable information on induced abortion is needed; however, the difficulty of measuring abortion in settings where it is legally restricted and highly stigmatized calls for innovation in approaches to measuring abortion incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data were from three original surveys conducted in Java among health facilities, knowledgeable informants and women aged 15-49, fielded in April 2018-January 2019. Two methods were used to estimate the one-year induced abortion incidence rate in Java: the standard Abortion Incidence Complications Method (AICM) and a modified AICM. Each method was evaluated on the basis of data quality, and what is known about sexual and reproductive health indicators related to abortion rates, to determine which performed best in measuring abortion incidence in Java.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimates of complications resulting from induced abortion from knowledgeable informants and the women differed substantially. The modified AICM produced an estimate of 42.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-49, while the standard AICM estimate was lower (25.8 per 1,000). A comparison of the distribution of abortion methods used revealed that knowledgeable informants believed abortion was less safe than indicated by women's reports of their own experiences. Therefore, the standard AICM likely underestimates abortion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The modified AICM performed better than the standard AICM and indicates that abortion is common in Java. Increased access to contraceptives and high-quality postabortion care is needed. Future research should investigate the safety of abortion, especially with respect to self-managed abortion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"211-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1363/46e0220\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1363/46e0220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

背景:在印度尼西亚,产妇死亡率很高,堕胎受到限制。需要关于人工流产的可靠信息;然而,在堕胎受到法律限制和高度污名化的环境中,衡量堕胎的困难要求在衡量堕胎发生率的方法上进行创新。方法:数据来自2018年4月至2019年1月在爪哇省对卫生机构、知情举报人和15-49岁妇女进行的三次原始调查。采用两种方法估算爪哇地区一年人工流产发生率:标准流产发生率并发症法(AICM)和改进的AICM。根据数据质量以及与堕胎率有关的性健康和生殖健康指标的已知情况,对每种方法进行了评估,以确定哪种方法在衡量爪哇堕胎率方面表现最好。结果:有知识的检举人和妇女对人工流产并发症的估计差异很大。修改后的AICM估计每1000名15-49岁的妇女中有42.5人堕胎,而标准的AICM估计更低(每1000人25.8人)。对所使用的堕胎方法的分布进行比较表明,有知识的举报人认为,堕胎的安全性不如妇女报告其自身经历所表明的那样高。因此,标准的AICM可能低估了堕胎。结论:改进的AICM比标准的AICM效果更好,表明流产在爪哇是常见的。需要增加获得避孕药具和高质量流产后护理的机会。未来的研究应探讨流产的安全性,特别是自我管理流产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating the Incidence of Induced Abortion in Java, Indonesia, 2018.

Context: In Indonesia, maternal mortality is high and abortion is restricted. Reliable information on induced abortion is needed; however, the difficulty of measuring abortion in settings where it is legally restricted and highly stigmatized calls for innovation in approaches to measuring abortion incidence.

Methods: The data were from three original surveys conducted in Java among health facilities, knowledgeable informants and women aged 15-49, fielded in April 2018-January 2019. Two methods were used to estimate the one-year induced abortion incidence rate in Java: the standard Abortion Incidence Complications Method (AICM) and a modified AICM. Each method was evaluated on the basis of data quality, and what is known about sexual and reproductive health indicators related to abortion rates, to determine which performed best in measuring abortion incidence in Java.

Results: Estimates of complications resulting from induced abortion from knowledgeable informants and the women differed substantially. The modified AICM produced an estimate of 42.5 abortions per 1,000 women aged 15-49, while the standard AICM estimate was lower (25.8 per 1,000). A comparison of the distribution of abortion methods used revealed that knowledgeable informants believed abortion was less safe than indicated by women's reports of their own experiences. Therefore, the standard AICM likely underestimates abortion.

Conclusions: The modified AICM performed better than the standard AICM and indicates that abortion is common in Java. Increased access to contraceptives and high-quality postabortion care is needed. Future research should investigate the safety of abortion, especially with respect to self-managed abortion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信