生殖盆腔疼痛:多模式治疗效果的回顾性评价。

IF 1 Q2 Medicine
Anna Ghizzani, Stefano Luisi, Alessandra Cartocci, Gabriele Cevenini
{"title":"生殖盆腔疼痛:多模式治疗效果的回顾性评价。","authors":"Anna Ghizzani, Stefano Luisi, Alessandra Cartocci, Gabriele Cevenini","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04555-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Genitopelvic and sexual pain penetration disorder (GPPD) recognizes a multifaceted etiology. As with syndromes of chronic pain, it responds poorly to medications and its management is difficult. Clinicians consequently favor a multimodal comprehensive approach to tackle the different aspects of the disorder. To treat GPPD women, we chose a multimodal regimen including topical and systemic medications associated with physical interventions and behavioral couple therapy. Our aim was to evaluate the regimen efficacy and the influence that demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics may have on the outcome. METHODS Sixty self -referred women requesting medical care for GPPD, who were free of debilitating illness, in stable heterosexual relationships and with healthy and sexually functional partners, were treated according with the multimodal regimen we tailored on the specific needs of these women. As said, it associated topical and systemic medications combined with physical exercises used in behavioral sex therapy, and behavioral couple therapy. Past sexual history, characteristics of pain, vestibular hyperreactivity, pelvic floor hypertonicity, general health, and couple harmony were evaluated and statistically analyzed to determine which characteristics were associated with therapy outcome. RESULTS The statistical analysis of an association between demographic, reproductive, pain and medical conditions on one hand and therapy outcome on the other did not find any significance. CONCLUSIONS The lack of association between the investigated characteristics and treatment outcome is disappointing; on the other hand, the statistically significant impact of couple harmony (evaluated as partner presence and participation) on the treatment results may be the answer to our search for factors predicting outcome.","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"72 3","pages":"123-131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genitopelvic pain: retrospective evaluation of a multimodal treatment efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Ghizzani, Stefano Luisi, Alessandra Cartocci, Gabriele Cevenini\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04555-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND Genitopelvic and sexual pain penetration disorder (GPPD) recognizes a multifaceted etiology. As with syndromes of chronic pain, it responds poorly to medications and its management is difficult. Clinicians consequently favor a multimodal comprehensive approach to tackle the different aspects of the disorder. To treat GPPD women, we chose a multimodal regimen including topical and systemic medications associated with physical interventions and behavioral couple therapy. Our aim was to evaluate the regimen efficacy and the influence that demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics may have on the outcome. METHODS Sixty self -referred women requesting medical care for GPPD, who were free of debilitating illness, in stable heterosexual relationships and with healthy and sexually functional partners, were treated according with the multimodal regimen we tailored on the specific needs of these women. As said, it associated topical and systemic medications combined with physical exercises used in behavioral sex therapy, and behavioral couple therapy. Past sexual history, characteristics of pain, vestibular hyperreactivity, pelvic floor hypertonicity, general health, and couple harmony were evaluated and statistically analyzed to determine which characteristics were associated with therapy outcome. RESULTS The statistical analysis of an association between demographic, reproductive, pain and medical conditions on one hand and therapy outcome on the other did not find any significance. CONCLUSIONS The lack of association between the investigated characteristics and treatment outcome is disappointing; on the other hand, the statistically significant impact of couple harmony (evaluated as partner presence and participation) on the treatment results may be the answer to our search for factors predicting outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva ginecologica\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"123-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva ginecologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04555-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04555-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:生殖盆腔和性疼痛穿透障碍(GPPD)认识到多方面的病因。与慢性疼痛综合征一样,它对药物的反应很差,治疗也很困难。因此,临床医生倾向于采用多模式综合方法来解决该疾病的不同方面。为了治疗GPPD女性,我们选择了一种多模式的治疗方案,包括局部和全身药物治疗,结合物理干预和行为夫妇治疗。我们的目的是评估治疗方案的疗效以及人口统计学、临床和疼痛特征对治疗结果的影响。方法:60名要求治疗GPPD的自我推荐妇女,她们没有衰弱性疾病,有稳定的异性关系,有健康和性功能的伴侣,根据我们针对这些妇女的具体需求量身定制的多模式治疗方案进行治疗。如前所述,它将局部和全身药物与行为性治疗和行为夫妻治疗中使用的体育锻炼相结合。评估过去的性史、疼痛特征、前庭高反应性、盆底高张力、一般健康状况和夫妻和谐,并进行统计分析,以确定哪些特征与治疗结果相关。结果:统计分析人口、生殖、疼痛和医疗状况与治疗结果之间的关系,没有发现任何意义。结论:所调查的特征与治疗结果之间缺乏相关性令人失望;另一方面,夫妻和谐(以伴侣在场和参与来评估)对治疗结果的统计显著影响可能是我们寻找预测结果因素的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genitopelvic pain: retrospective evaluation of a multimodal treatment efficacy.
BACKGROUND Genitopelvic and sexual pain penetration disorder (GPPD) recognizes a multifaceted etiology. As with syndromes of chronic pain, it responds poorly to medications and its management is difficult. Clinicians consequently favor a multimodal comprehensive approach to tackle the different aspects of the disorder. To treat GPPD women, we chose a multimodal regimen including topical and systemic medications associated with physical interventions and behavioral couple therapy. Our aim was to evaluate the regimen efficacy and the influence that demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics may have on the outcome. METHODS Sixty self -referred women requesting medical care for GPPD, who were free of debilitating illness, in stable heterosexual relationships and with healthy and sexually functional partners, were treated according with the multimodal regimen we tailored on the specific needs of these women. As said, it associated topical and systemic medications combined with physical exercises used in behavioral sex therapy, and behavioral couple therapy. Past sexual history, characteristics of pain, vestibular hyperreactivity, pelvic floor hypertonicity, general health, and couple harmony were evaluated and statistically analyzed to determine which characteristics were associated with therapy outcome. RESULTS The statistical analysis of an association between demographic, reproductive, pain and medical conditions on one hand and therapy outcome on the other did not find any significance. CONCLUSIONS The lack of association between the investigated characteristics and treatment outcome is disappointing; on the other hand, the statistically significant impact of couple harmony (evaluated as partner presence and participation) on the treatment results may be the answer to our search for factors predicting outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信