埃塞俄比亚Ras-Desta纪念总医院头孢曲松用药评价

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety Pub Date : 2020-09-10 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DHPS.S260364
Oumer Sada Muhammed, Beshir Bedru Nasir
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚Ras-Desta纪念总医院头孢曲松用药评价","authors":"Oumer Sada Muhammed,&nbsp;Beshir Bedru Nasir","doi":"10.2147/DHPS.S260364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ceftriaxone is one of the most commonly used antibiotics due to its availability, wide spectrum of activity and low toxicity. However, irrational use of ceftriaxone is one of the current issues in most countries, especially developing ones.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate ceftriaxone utilization in different wards of Ras-Desta Memorial General Hospital (RDMGH) in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institution-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on randomly selected 1,079 patients who were admitted to RDMGH from May 2017 to April 2018. A structured data abstraction format was used to collect data from patients' medical chart. Micromedex® drug interaction checker was used to identify significant drug-drug interactions, and national and international guidelines were used to evaluate the appropriateness of ceftriaxone use. The data were analyzed by using SPSS version 20.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,079 patients enrolled, ceftriaxone was utilized by 601 (55.7%) patients, and these patients were considered for evaluation of appropriateness and subsequent analysis. Among 601 patients, ceftriaxone was used for therapeutic purpose in 362 (60.2%) patients; of which, 359 (99.2%) were for empiric therapy and the rest 239 (39.8%) were for prophylaxis. In the majority of the patients, the dose of ceftriaxone was 2g/day 472 (78.6%) and for a duration of 2-7 days 409 (68.1%). Inappropriate use of ceftriaxone was observed among 237 (39.4%) patients with regard to indication, dose/frequency and duration. About half (49.3%) of the deviation from the guidelines was observed from surgical and gynecologic/obstetrics wards. Among the co-prescribed medications with ceftriaxone, ringer lactate, warfarin and heparin were found to have a significant drug-drug interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that inappropriate use of ceftriaxone was high in RDMGH. This may increase the emergence of resistant pathogens which may lead to treatment failure and increase cost of therapy. Therefore, adherence to current evidence-based guidelines is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":11377,"journal":{"name":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/DHPS.S260364","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Use Evaluation of Ceftriaxone in Ras-Desta Memorial General Hospital, Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Oumer Sada Muhammed,&nbsp;Beshir Bedru Nasir\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DHPS.S260364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ceftriaxone is one of the most commonly used antibiotics due to its availability, wide spectrum of activity and low toxicity. However, irrational use of ceftriaxone is one of the current issues in most countries, especially developing ones.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate ceftriaxone utilization in different wards of Ras-Desta Memorial General Hospital (RDMGH) in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An institution-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on randomly selected 1,079 patients who were admitted to RDMGH from May 2017 to April 2018. A structured data abstraction format was used to collect data from patients' medical chart. Micromedex® drug interaction checker was used to identify significant drug-drug interactions, and national and international guidelines were used to evaluate the appropriateness of ceftriaxone use. The data were analyzed by using SPSS version 20.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,079 patients enrolled, ceftriaxone was utilized by 601 (55.7%) patients, and these patients were considered for evaluation of appropriateness and subsequent analysis. Among 601 patients, ceftriaxone was used for therapeutic purpose in 362 (60.2%) patients; of which, 359 (99.2%) were for empiric therapy and the rest 239 (39.8%) were for prophylaxis. In the majority of the patients, the dose of ceftriaxone was 2g/day 472 (78.6%) and for a duration of 2-7 days 409 (68.1%). Inappropriate use of ceftriaxone was observed among 237 (39.4%) patients with regard to indication, dose/frequency and duration. About half (49.3%) of the deviation from the guidelines was observed from surgical and gynecologic/obstetrics wards. Among the co-prescribed medications with ceftriaxone, ringer lactate, warfarin and heparin were found to have a significant drug-drug interaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed that inappropriate use of ceftriaxone was high in RDMGH. This may increase the emergence of resistant pathogens which may lead to treatment failure and increase cost of therapy. Therefore, adherence to current evidence-based guidelines is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/DHPS.S260364\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S260364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S260364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:头孢曲松因其可获得性、广谱活性和低毒性而成为最常用的抗生素之一。然而,头孢曲松的不合理使用是目前大多数国家,特别是发展中国家普遍存在的问题之一。目的:本研究的目的是评估头孢曲松在埃塞俄比亚Ras-Desta纪念总医院(RDMGH)不同病房的使用情况。方法:随机选择2017年5月至2018年4月在RDMGH住院的1079例患者进行基于机构的回顾性横断面研究。采用结构化数据抽象格式从患者病历中收集数据。使用Micromedex®药物相互作用检测器识别显著的药物-药物相互作用,并使用国家和国际指南评估头孢曲松使用的适宜性。采用SPSS 20.0版本对数据进行分析。结果:纳入的1079例患者中,601例(55.7%)患者使用头孢曲松,这些患者被考虑进行适当性评估和后续分析。601例患者中,362例(60.2%)患者使用头孢曲松作为治疗目的;其中经验性治疗359例(99.2%),预防性治疗239例(39.8%)。在大多数患者中,头孢曲松的剂量为2g/天472(78.6%),持续时间为2-7天409(68.1%)。237例(39.4%)患者在适应证、剂量/频率和持续时间方面存在不适当使用头孢曲松的情况。大约一半(49.3%)的偏离指南发生在外科和妇产科病房。在与头孢曲松合用的药物中,乳酸林格、华法林和肝素存在显著的药物相互作用。结论:本研究揭示了头孢曲松的不当使用对RDMGH有较高的影响。这可能会增加耐药病原体的出现,从而导致治疗失败并增加治疗费用。因此,建议遵循目前的循证指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Drug Use Evaluation of Ceftriaxone in Ras-Desta Memorial General Hospital, Ethiopia.

Drug Use Evaluation of Ceftriaxone in Ras-Desta Memorial General Hospital, Ethiopia.

Drug Use Evaluation of Ceftriaxone in Ras-Desta Memorial General Hospital, Ethiopia.

Background: Ceftriaxone is one of the most commonly used antibiotics due to its availability, wide spectrum of activity and low toxicity. However, irrational use of ceftriaxone is one of the current issues in most countries, especially developing ones.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate ceftriaxone utilization in different wards of Ras-Desta Memorial General Hospital (RDMGH) in Ethiopia.

Methods: An institution-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on randomly selected 1,079 patients who were admitted to RDMGH from May 2017 to April 2018. A structured data abstraction format was used to collect data from patients' medical chart. Micromedex® drug interaction checker was used to identify significant drug-drug interactions, and national and international guidelines were used to evaluate the appropriateness of ceftriaxone use. The data were analyzed by using SPSS version 20.0.

Results: Among the 1,079 patients enrolled, ceftriaxone was utilized by 601 (55.7%) patients, and these patients were considered for evaluation of appropriateness and subsequent analysis. Among 601 patients, ceftriaxone was used for therapeutic purpose in 362 (60.2%) patients; of which, 359 (99.2%) were for empiric therapy and the rest 239 (39.8%) were for prophylaxis. In the majority of the patients, the dose of ceftriaxone was 2g/day 472 (78.6%) and for a duration of 2-7 days 409 (68.1%). Inappropriate use of ceftriaxone was observed among 237 (39.4%) patients with regard to indication, dose/frequency and duration. About half (49.3%) of the deviation from the guidelines was observed from surgical and gynecologic/obstetrics wards. Among the co-prescribed medications with ceftriaxone, ringer lactate, warfarin and heparin were found to have a significant drug-drug interaction.

Conclusion: This study revealed that inappropriate use of ceftriaxone was high in RDMGH. This may increase the emergence of resistant pathogens which may lead to treatment failure and increase cost of therapy. Therefore, adherence to current evidence-based guidelines is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信