依托泊苷和环磷酰胺对多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血干细胞收集的有效动员。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Xiaoning Wang, Ying Zhang, Ting Fan, Haibo Liu, Mengchang Wang, Huasheng Liu, Mei Zhang, Pengcheng He
{"title":"依托泊苷和环磷酰胺对多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血干细胞收集的有效动员。","authors":"Xiaoning Wang,&nbsp;Ying Zhang,&nbsp;Ting Fan,&nbsp;Haibo Liu,&nbsp;Mengchang Wang,&nbsp;Huasheng Liu,&nbsp;Mei Zhang,&nbsp;Pengcheng He","doi":"10.25011/cim.v43i3.34643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide and cyclophosphamide for mobilization peripheral stem cells in multiple myeloma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent peripheral blood stem cell collection for upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between January 2010 and July 2019. The mobilization protocols included cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2 with G-CSF (CTX group) before January 2015, and two-days of 5 mg/kg.d etoposide and 1.0 g/m2.d cyclophosphamide with G-CSF (EC group) after January 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of harvest (≥2×106 cells/kg) during the first mobilization attempt was 82.1% in the EC group and 50.0% in the CTX group, and the rate of adequate harvest (≥4×106 cells/kg) was 57.1% in the EC group and 15.8% in the CTX group. After the second mobilization, a sufficient number of CD34+/kg cells for an auto-HSCT was obtained for all patients in the EC group and the majority (68.4%) of patients in CTX group. There was no significant difference of non-hematological adverse events between two groups. The mean neutrophil engraftment time was 11.22±1.56 days and 9.89±2.81days for the CTX and EC groups, respectively (P>0.05). Platelet engraftments were significantly faster in the EC group than the CTX group (P0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The etoposide and cyclophosphamide regimen could be an effective and safe method for mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.</p>","PeriodicalId":50683,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effective mobilization with etoposide and cyclophosphamide for collection of peripheral blood stem cell in patients with multiple myeloma.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoning Wang,&nbsp;Ying Zhang,&nbsp;Ting Fan,&nbsp;Haibo Liu,&nbsp;Mengchang Wang,&nbsp;Huasheng Liu,&nbsp;Mei Zhang,&nbsp;Pengcheng He\",\"doi\":\"10.25011/cim.v43i3.34643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide and cyclophosphamide for mobilization peripheral stem cells in multiple myeloma patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent peripheral blood stem cell collection for upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between January 2010 and July 2019. The mobilization protocols included cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2 with G-CSF (CTX group) before January 2015, and two-days of 5 mg/kg.d etoposide and 1.0 g/m2.d cyclophosphamide with G-CSF (EC group) after January 2015.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of harvest (≥2×106 cells/kg) during the first mobilization attempt was 82.1% in the EC group and 50.0% in the CTX group, and the rate of adequate harvest (≥4×106 cells/kg) was 57.1% in the EC group and 15.8% in the CTX group. After the second mobilization, a sufficient number of CD34+/kg cells for an auto-HSCT was obtained for all patients in the EC group and the majority (68.4%) of patients in CTX group. There was no significant difference of non-hematological adverse events between two groups. The mean neutrophil engraftment time was 11.22±1.56 days and 9.89±2.81days for the CTX and EC groups, respectively (P>0.05). Platelet engraftments were significantly faster in the EC group than the CTX group (P0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The etoposide and cyclophosphamide regimen could be an effective and safe method for mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Investigative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Investigative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v43i3.34643\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v43i3.34643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:评价依托泊苷和环磷酰胺对多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血干细胞动员的疗效和毒性。方法:回顾性分析2010年1月至2019年7月在西安交通大学第一附属医院行外周血干细胞采集用于前期自体造血干细胞移植的46例多发性骨髓瘤患者。动员方案为2015年1月前用环磷酰胺2.0 g/m2加g - csf (CTX组),5 mg/kg 2天。D依托泊苷和1.0 g/m2。d环磷酰胺与G-CSF (EC组)2015年1月后。结果:EC组和CTX组第一次动员时的收获成功率(≥2×106 cells/kg)分别为82.1%和50.0%,EC组和CTX组的充分收获率(≥4×106 cells/kg)分别为57.1%和15.8%。在第二次动员后,EC组的所有患者和CTX组的大多数患者(68.4%)获得了足够数量的CD34+/kg细胞进行自体造血干细胞移植。两组患者的非血液学不良事件无显著差异。CTX组和EC组的平均中性粒细胞移植时间分别为11.22±1.56 d和9.89±2.81d (P>0.05)。EC组血小板移植速度明显快于CTX组(P0.05)。结论:依托泊苷联合环磷酰胺治疗多发性骨髓瘤是一种安全有效的运动治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effective mobilization with etoposide and cyclophosphamide for collection of peripheral blood stem cell in patients with multiple myeloma.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide and cyclophosphamide for mobilization peripheral stem cells in multiple myeloma patients.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 46 patients with multiple myeloma who underwent peripheral blood stem cell collection for upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between January 2010 and July 2019. The mobilization protocols included cyclophosphamide 2.0 g/m2 with G-CSF (CTX group) before January 2015, and two-days of 5 mg/kg.d etoposide and 1.0 g/m2.d cyclophosphamide with G-CSF (EC group) after January 2015.

Results: The success rate of harvest (≥2×106 cells/kg) during the first mobilization attempt was 82.1% in the EC group and 50.0% in the CTX group, and the rate of adequate harvest (≥4×106 cells/kg) was 57.1% in the EC group and 15.8% in the CTX group. After the second mobilization, a sufficient number of CD34+/kg cells for an auto-HSCT was obtained for all patients in the EC group and the majority (68.4%) of patients in CTX group. There was no significant difference of non-hematological adverse events between two groups. The mean neutrophil engraftment time was 11.22±1.56 days and 9.89±2.81days for the CTX and EC groups, respectively (P>0.05). Platelet engraftments were significantly faster in the EC group than the CTX group (P0.05).

Conclusion: The etoposide and cyclophosphamide regimen could be an effective and safe method for mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Investigative Medicine
Clinical and Investigative Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Investigative Medicine (CIM), publishes original work in the field of Clinical Investigation. Original work includes clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical reports. Reviews include information for Continuing Medical Education (CME), narrative review articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信