[宫腔镜评分对绝经后出血和子宫内膜增厚患者子宫内膜癌诊断的准确性]。

Q3 Medicine
César Augusto Rendón-Becerra, Alex Gómez-Bravo, Andrés Felipe Erazo-Narváez, Roberth Alirio Ortiz-Martínez
{"title":"[宫腔镜评分对绝经后出血和子宫内膜增厚患者子宫内膜癌诊断的准确性]。","authors":"César Augusto Rendón-Becerra,&nbsp;Alex Gómez-Bravo,&nbsp;Andrés Felipe Erazo-Narváez,&nbsp;Roberth Alirio Ortiz-Martínez","doi":"10.18597/rcog.3445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopic scores in endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy study assembled within a cross-sectional study that included patients with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickening greater than 5 mm in whom hysteroscopy was performed and then compared with endometrial biopsy as the diagnostic gold standard, in two high complexity hospitals. Clinical, sociodemographic variables, as well as hysteroscopic scores and the results of endometrial tissue histopathology were measured. Sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios and area under the curve with their respective confidence intervals were estimated in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a 9 % prevalence of endometrial cancer, the hysteroscopic assessment system was shown to have 75 % sensitivity (95 % CI; 30.1- 95.43), 95,1 % specificity (95 % CI; 83.9-98.7), a positive likelihood ratio of 15.38 (95 %; CI 3.55- 66.56), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 and area under the curve of 85 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The standardized hysteroscopic assessment system was found to have an acceptable sensitivity for screening in patients with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickening (≥ 5 mm). Further studies with larger sample sizes are required in order to arrive at a more precise estimation of the operational characteristics of the hysteroscopic assessment system for the detection of endometrial cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":35675,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Diagnostic accuracy of a hysteroscopic score for the detection of endometrial cancer in patients with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickening].\",\"authors\":\"César Augusto Rendón-Becerra,&nbsp;Alex Gómez-Bravo,&nbsp;Andrés Felipe Erazo-Narváez,&nbsp;Roberth Alirio Ortiz-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.18597/rcog.3445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopic scores in endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diagnostic accuracy study assembled within a cross-sectional study that included patients with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickening greater than 5 mm in whom hysteroscopy was performed and then compared with endometrial biopsy as the diagnostic gold standard, in two high complexity hospitals. Clinical, sociodemographic variables, as well as hysteroscopic scores and the results of endometrial tissue histopathology were measured. Sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios and area under the curve with their respective confidence intervals were estimated in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With a 9 % prevalence of endometrial cancer, the hysteroscopic assessment system was shown to have 75 % sensitivity (95 % CI; 30.1- 95.43), 95,1 % specificity (95 % CI; 83.9-98.7), a positive likelihood ratio of 15.38 (95 %; CI 3.55- 66.56), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 and area under the curve of 85 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The standardized hysteroscopic assessment system was found to have an acceptable sensitivity for screening in patients with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickening (≥ 5 mm). Further studies with larger sample sizes are required in order to arrive at a more precise estimation of the operational characteristics of the hysteroscopic assessment system for the detection of endometrial cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18597/rcog.3445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价宫腔镜评分对子宫内膜癌的诊断准确性。方法:在一项横断面研究中,对两家高复杂性医院的绝经后出血和子宫内膜增厚大于5mm的患者进行诊断准确性研究,并将其与子宫内膜活检作为诊断金标准进行比较。测量临床、社会人口学变量,以及宫腔镜评分和子宫内膜组织病理学结果。在分析中估计灵敏度和特异性、似然比和曲线下面积及其各自的置信区间。结果:子宫内膜癌的发生率为9%,宫腔镜评估系统的敏感性为75% (95% CI;30.1- 95.43), 95.1%特异性(95% CI;83.9-98.7),阳性似然比为15.38 (95%;CI 3.55 ~ 66.56),负似然比为0.26,曲线下面积为85%。结论:标准化宫腔镜评估系统对绝经后出血和子宫内膜增厚(≥5mm)患者的筛查具有可接受的敏感性。为了更准确地估计宫腔镜评估系统检测子宫内膜癌的操作特性,需要进一步的研究,样本量更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Diagnostic accuracy of a hysteroscopic score for the detection of endometrial cancer in patients with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickening].

Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopic scores in endometrial cancer.

Methods: Diagnostic accuracy study assembled within a cross-sectional study that included patients with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickening greater than 5 mm in whom hysteroscopy was performed and then compared with endometrial biopsy as the diagnostic gold standard, in two high complexity hospitals. Clinical, sociodemographic variables, as well as hysteroscopic scores and the results of endometrial tissue histopathology were measured. Sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios and area under the curve with their respective confidence intervals were estimated in the analysis.

Results: With a 9 % prevalence of endometrial cancer, the hysteroscopic assessment system was shown to have 75 % sensitivity (95 % CI; 30.1- 95.43), 95,1 % specificity (95 % CI; 83.9-98.7), a positive likelihood ratio of 15.38 (95 %; CI 3.55- 66.56), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.26 and area under the curve of 85 %.

Conclusions: The standardized hysteroscopic assessment system was found to have an acceptable sensitivity for screening in patients with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickening (≥ 5 mm). Further studies with larger sample sizes are required in order to arrive at a more precise estimation of the operational characteristics of the hysteroscopic assessment system for the detection of endometrial cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia
Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecologia Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología was founded in January 1949. It is the Federación Colombiana de Asociaciones de Obstetricia y Ginecología"s official periodic publication (formerly known as the Sociedad Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología). It is published quarterly and the following abbreviation should be used when citing the journal: Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol. The publication is authorized by Mingobierno resolution 218/1950.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信