牙龈上皮附着在良好或部分固化的树脂复合材料上。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
E Boloori, T Schoenmaker, C J Kleverlaan, B G Loos, T J de Vries
{"title":"牙龈上皮附着在良好或部分固化的树脂复合材料上。","authors":"E Boloori,&nbsp;T Schoenmaker,&nbsp;C J Kleverlaan,&nbsp;B G Loos,&nbsp;T J de Vries","doi":"10.22203/eCM.v040a16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ideal restoration material for caries would allow attachment of gingival epithelia. The attachment of epithelial cells to specimens of the 4 most commercially used well- or partially-cured resin composites, with and without TEGDMA, was assessed. Effects of resin composite on the Ca9-22 gingival epithelial cell-line were assessed by measuring the cytotoxicity, viability and gene expression for attachment, apoptosis, ROS-production, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and matrix metalloproteinases. As controls, cells on tissue culture plastic or bovine tooth enamel specimens were used. Significantly less cell attachment was measured on freshly made resin-composite specimens. Concomitantly, significantly higher cytotoxicity was measured in the presence of freshly made resin-composite specimens. However, after 8 d of leakage, the cell attachment to and cytotoxicity of the resin composite was comparable to bovine tooth enamel. Significantly higher expressions of IL6, MMP2, BCL6 and ITGA4 were measured in cells attached to resin-composite surfaces than controls. There were no significant differences between the results using different conditions of resin composite, with or without TEGDMA and well or partially cured. Less cell attachment and presence of more inflammatory markers were observed on all freshly-made resin-composite surfaces. However, after a leakage period attachment of cells to the resin composite improved to the level of natural tooth materials such as enamel. This indicated that the negative effects of resin composites on epithelial cells might be transient.</p>","PeriodicalId":11849,"journal":{"name":"European cells & materials","volume":"40 ","pages":"259-275"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gingival epithelium attachment to well- or partially cured resin composites.\",\"authors\":\"E Boloori,&nbsp;T Schoenmaker,&nbsp;C J Kleverlaan,&nbsp;B G Loos,&nbsp;T J de Vries\",\"doi\":\"10.22203/eCM.v040a16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Ideal restoration material for caries would allow attachment of gingival epithelia. The attachment of epithelial cells to specimens of the 4 most commercially used well- or partially-cured resin composites, with and without TEGDMA, was assessed. Effects of resin composite on the Ca9-22 gingival epithelial cell-line were assessed by measuring the cytotoxicity, viability and gene expression for attachment, apoptosis, ROS-production, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and matrix metalloproteinases. As controls, cells on tissue culture plastic or bovine tooth enamel specimens were used. Significantly less cell attachment was measured on freshly made resin-composite specimens. Concomitantly, significantly higher cytotoxicity was measured in the presence of freshly made resin-composite specimens. However, after 8 d of leakage, the cell attachment to and cytotoxicity of the resin composite was comparable to bovine tooth enamel. Significantly higher expressions of IL6, MMP2, BCL6 and ITGA4 were measured in cells attached to resin-composite surfaces than controls. There were no significant differences between the results using different conditions of resin composite, with or without TEGDMA and well or partially cured. Less cell attachment and presence of more inflammatory markers were observed on all freshly-made resin-composite surfaces. However, after a leakage period attachment of cells to the resin composite improved to the level of natural tooth materials such as enamel. This indicated that the negative effects of resin composites on epithelial cells might be transient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European cells & materials\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"259-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European cells & materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v040a16\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European cells & materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v040a16","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

理想的龋修复材料应能附着牙龈上皮。评估了4种最常用的完全或部分固化树脂复合材料(含或不含TEGDMA)的上皮细胞附着在样品上的情况。通过测定树脂复合材料对Ca9-22牙龈上皮细胞系的细胞毒性、细胞活力以及附着、凋亡、ros生成、促炎细胞因子和基质金属蛋白酶的基因表达来评估树脂复合材料对Ca9-22牙龈上皮细胞系的影响。用组织培养的塑料或牛牙釉质标本上的细胞作为对照。在新制作的树脂复合材料样品上,细胞附着明显减少。同时,在新鲜制作的树脂复合材料标本中,测量到明显更高的细胞毒性。然而,渗漏8 d后,树脂复合材料的细胞附着和细胞毒性与牛牙釉质相当。与对照组相比,附着在树脂复合材料表面的细胞中IL6、MMP2、BCL6和ITGA4的表达明显增加。不同条件的树脂复合材料,加或不加TEGDMA,充分或部分固化的结果没有显著差异。在所有新制作的树脂复合材料表面上观察到较少的细胞附着和更多的炎症标志物。然而,经过一段时间的渗漏后,细胞附着在树脂复合材料上的程度提高到天然牙齿材料(如牙釉质)的水平。这表明树脂复合材料对上皮细胞的负面影响可能是短暂的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gingival epithelium attachment to well- or partially cured resin composites.

Ideal restoration material for caries would allow attachment of gingival epithelia. The attachment of epithelial cells to specimens of the 4 most commercially used well- or partially-cured resin composites, with and without TEGDMA, was assessed. Effects of resin composite on the Ca9-22 gingival epithelial cell-line were assessed by measuring the cytotoxicity, viability and gene expression for attachment, apoptosis, ROS-production, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and matrix metalloproteinases. As controls, cells on tissue culture plastic or bovine tooth enamel specimens were used. Significantly less cell attachment was measured on freshly made resin-composite specimens. Concomitantly, significantly higher cytotoxicity was measured in the presence of freshly made resin-composite specimens. However, after 8 d of leakage, the cell attachment to and cytotoxicity of the resin composite was comparable to bovine tooth enamel. Significantly higher expressions of IL6, MMP2, BCL6 and ITGA4 were measured in cells attached to resin-composite surfaces than controls. There were no significant differences between the results using different conditions of resin composite, with or without TEGDMA and well or partially cured. Less cell attachment and presence of more inflammatory markers were observed on all freshly-made resin-composite surfaces. However, after a leakage period attachment of cells to the resin composite improved to the level of natural tooth materials such as enamel. This indicated that the negative effects of resin composites on epithelial cells might be transient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European cells & materials
European cells & materials 生物-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: eCM provides an interdisciplinary forum for publication of preclinical research in the musculoskeletal field (Trauma, Maxillofacial (including dental), Spine and Orthopaedics). The clinical relevance of the work must be briefly mentioned within the abstract, and in more detail in the paper. Poor abstracts which do not concisely cover the paper contents will not be sent for review. Incremental steps in research will not be entertained by eCM journal.Cross-disciplinary papers that go across our scope areas are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信