肝细胞癌肝移植风险评估标准:改进移植肿瘤学的建议。

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
John C McVey, Kazunari Sasaki, Daniel J Firl
{"title":"肝细胞癌肝移植风险评估标准:改进移植肿瘤学的建议。","authors":"John C McVey,&nbsp;Kazunari Sasaki,&nbsp;Daniel J Firl","doi":"10.2217/hep-2020-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma has proved to be a highly effective cure if the right patient can be selected. Milan criteria has traditionally guided physicians toward appropriate liver allocation but changes in clinical practice, patient populations and recent developments in biomarkers are decreasing Milan criteria's utility. At the same time, the literature has flooded with a diversity of new criteria that demonstrate strong predictive power and are better suited for current clinical practice. In this article, the utility of newly proposed criteria will be reviewed and important issues to improve future criteria will be addressed in hopes of opening a discussion on how key questions surrounding criteria for liver transplantation of hepatocellular carcinoma can be answered.</p>","PeriodicalId":44854,"journal":{"name":"Hepatic Oncology","volume":"7 3","pages":"HEP26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2020-0003","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessment criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: proposal to improve transplant oncology.\",\"authors\":\"John C McVey,&nbsp;Kazunari Sasaki,&nbsp;Daniel J Firl\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/hep-2020-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma has proved to be a highly effective cure if the right patient can be selected. Milan criteria has traditionally guided physicians toward appropriate liver allocation but changes in clinical practice, patient populations and recent developments in biomarkers are decreasing Milan criteria's utility. At the same time, the literature has flooded with a diversity of new criteria that demonstrate strong predictive power and are better suited for current clinical practice. In this article, the utility of newly proposed criteria will be reviewed and important issues to improve future criteria will be addressed in hopes of opening a discussion on how key questions surrounding criteria for liver transplantation of hepatocellular carcinoma can be answered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatic Oncology\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"HEP26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/hep-2020-0003\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2020-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2020-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

肝移植治疗肝细胞癌已被证明是一个非常有效的治疗,如果正确的病人可以选择。米兰标准传统上指导医生进行适当的肝脏分配,但临床实践、患者群体和生物标志物的最新发展的变化正在降低米兰标准的效用。与此同时,文献中充斥着各种各样的新标准,这些标准显示出强大的预测能力,更适合当前的临床实践。在本文中,将回顾新提出的标准的应用,并讨论改进未来标准的重要问题,以期就如何回答肝细胞癌肝移植标准的关键问题展开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risk assessment criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: proposal to improve transplant oncology.

Risk assessment criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: proposal to improve transplant oncology.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma has proved to be a highly effective cure if the right patient can be selected. Milan criteria has traditionally guided physicians toward appropriate liver allocation but changes in clinical practice, patient populations and recent developments in biomarkers are decreasing Milan criteria's utility. At the same time, the literature has flooded with a diversity of new criteria that demonstrate strong predictive power and are better suited for current clinical practice. In this article, the utility of newly proposed criteria will be reviewed and important issues to improve future criteria will be addressed in hopes of opening a discussion on how key questions surrounding criteria for liver transplantation of hepatocellular carcinoma can be answered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatic Oncology
Hepatic Oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Primary liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer in the world, and the third most common cause of death from malignant disease. Traditionally more common in developing countries, hepatocellular carcinoma is becoming increasingly prevalent in the Western world, primarily due to an increase in hepatitis C virus infection. Emerging risk factors, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and obesity are also of concern for the future. In addition, metastatic tumors of the liver are more common than primary disease. Some studies report hepatic metastases in as many as 40 to 50% of adult patients with extrahepatic primary tumors. Hepatic Oncology publishes original research studies and reviews addressing preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to all types of cancer of the liver, in both the adult and pediatric populations. The journal also highlights significant advances in basic and translational research, and places them in context for future therapy. Hepatic Oncology provides a forum to report and debate all aspects of cancer of the liver and bile ducts. The journal publishes original research studies, full reviews and commentaries, with all articles subject to independent review by a minimum of three independent experts. Unsolicited article proposals are welcomed and authors are required to comply fully with the journal''s Disclosure & Conflict of Interest Policy as well as major publishing guidelines, including ICMJE and GPP3.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信