前列腺癌放射治疗后复发的微创治疗策略:系统综述。

Q1 Medicine
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-04 DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03783-2
Guglielmo Mantica, Francesco Chierigo, Nazareno Suardi, Juan Gomez Rivas, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Rocco Papalia, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia, Carlo Terrone, Francesco Esperto
{"title":"前列腺癌放射治疗后复发的微创治疗策略:系统综述。","authors":"Guglielmo Mantica,&nbsp;Francesco Chierigo,&nbsp;Nazareno Suardi,&nbsp;Juan Gomez Rivas,&nbsp;Veeru Kasivisvanathan,&nbsp;Rocco Papalia,&nbsp;Cristian Fiori,&nbsp;Francesco Porpiglia,&nbsp;Carlo Terrone,&nbsp;Francesco Esperto","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03783-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this review was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the role of minimally invasive salvage modalities in radio-recurrent prostate cancer and the associated clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review of the current literature was conducted through the Medline and NCBI PubMed, Scopus databases in January 2020. All papers published after 2000, concerning studies conducted on humans for radio-recurrent prostate cancer were considered for the review.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Overall, 545 studies were identified. After duplicate exclusion, initial screening, and eligibility evaluation, a total of 80 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, corresponding to a cohort of 6681 patients. The median age at initial diagnosis ranged from 59 to 75.5. Pre-treatment PSA ranged from 6.2 to 27.4 ng/mL. All patients underwent primary radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cryotherapy, Brachytherapy, EBRT, HIFU were the minimally invasive options mostly used as salvage therapy. They showed to be promising approaches for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) control, with acceptable toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive therapeutic options offer promising results in terms of biochemical control in the local recurrence setting. Unfortunately, the absence of high quality and comparative studies makes it difficult to establish which method is the best in terms of oncological and safety outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":" ","pages":"563-578"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally invasive strategies for the treatment of prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Guglielmo Mantica,&nbsp;Francesco Chierigo,&nbsp;Nazareno Suardi,&nbsp;Juan Gomez Rivas,&nbsp;Veeru Kasivisvanathan,&nbsp;Rocco Papalia,&nbsp;Cristian Fiori,&nbsp;Francesco Porpiglia,&nbsp;Carlo Terrone,&nbsp;Francesco Esperto\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03783-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this review was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the role of minimally invasive salvage modalities in radio-recurrent prostate cancer and the associated clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic review of the current literature was conducted through the Medline and NCBI PubMed, Scopus databases in January 2020. All papers published after 2000, concerning studies conducted on humans for radio-recurrent prostate cancer were considered for the review.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Overall, 545 studies were identified. After duplicate exclusion, initial screening, and eligibility evaluation, a total of 80 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, corresponding to a cohort of 6681 patients. The median age at initial diagnosis ranged from 59 to 75.5. Pre-treatment PSA ranged from 6.2 to 27.4 ng/mL. All patients underwent primary radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cryotherapy, Brachytherapy, EBRT, HIFU were the minimally invasive options mostly used as salvage therapy. They showed to be promising approaches for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) control, with acceptable toxicities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Minimally invasive therapeutic options offer promising results in terms of biochemical control in the local recurrence setting. Unfortunately, the absence of high quality and comparative studies makes it difficult to establish which method is the best in terms of oncological and safety outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"563-578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03783-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/8/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03783-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

简介:本综述的目的是对微创挽救方式在放射复发性前列腺癌中的作用以及相关的临床结果和毒性概况进行全面分析。证据获取:2020年1月,通过Medline和NCBI PubMed、Scopus数据库对当前文献进行了系统综述。2000年以后发表的所有关于人类放射复发性前列腺癌研究的论文都被纳入审查范围。证据综合:总共确定了545项研究。经过重复排除、初始筛选和合格性评估,定性分析共纳入80项研究,对应6681例患者。初次诊断时的中位年龄为59岁至75.5岁。预处理前PSA范围为6.2 ~ 27.4 ng/mL。所有患者都接受了局部前列腺癌的初始放疗。冷冻治疗、近距离放疗、EBRT、HIFU是微创治疗的主要选择。它们具有可接受的毒性,是控制复发性前列腺癌(PCa)的有希望的方法。结论:微创治疗方案在局部复发的生化控制方面提供了有希望的结果。不幸的是,由于缺乏高质量的比较研究,很难确定哪种方法在肿瘤学和安全性方面是最好的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally invasive strategies for the treatment of prostate cancer recurrence after radiation therapy: a systematic review.

Introduction: The aim of this review was to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the role of minimally invasive salvage modalities in radio-recurrent prostate cancer and the associated clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the current literature was conducted through the Medline and NCBI PubMed, Scopus databases in January 2020. All papers published after 2000, concerning studies conducted on humans for radio-recurrent prostate cancer were considered for the review.

Evidence synthesis: Overall, 545 studies were identified. After duplicate exclusion, initial screening, and eligibility evaluation, a total of 80 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, corresponding to a cohort of 6681 patients. The median age at initial diagnosis ranged from 59 to 75.5. Pre-treatment PSA ranged from 6.2 to 27.4 ng/mL. All patients underwent primary radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. Cryotherapy, Brachytherapy, EBRT, HIFU were the minimally invasive options mostly used as salvage therapy. They showed to be promising approaches for recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) control, with acceptable toxicities.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive therapeutic options offer promising results in terms of biochemical control in the local recurrence setting. Unfortunately, the absence of high quality and comparative studies makes it difficult to establish which method is the best in terms of oncological and safety outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信