打破初级保健办公室的沉默:患者对避孕咨询中讨论堕胎的态度

Q2 Medicine
Shokoufeh Dianat , Ilana A Silverstein , Kelsey Holt , Jody Steinauer , Christine Dehlendorf
{"title":"打破初级保健办公室的沉默:患者对避孕咨询中讨论堕胎的态度","authors":"Shokoufeh Dianat ,&nbsp;Ilana A Silverstein ,&nbsp;Kelsey Holt ,&nbsp;Jody Steinauer ,&nbsp;Christine Dehlendorf","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Abortions are common health experiences in the United States, yet they are siloed from mainstream health care. To provide guidance on how clinicians could break down these silos, normalize conversations about abortion, and potentially improve patient experience and contraceptive decision-making, we sought to understand patient attitudes regarding discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>In 2018, we completed in-depth semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women recruited from primary care clinics of two politically disparate regions within California. We elicited acceptability, preferences, and implications of clinicians mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling. Using directed content analysis, we coded transcripts for inductive and deductive themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We achieved thematic saturation after 49 interviews. Interviewees were diverse in reproductive history, race/ethnicity, religiosity, and abortion attitudes. Participants with diverse attitudes about abortion reported that having abortion mentioned during contraceptive counseling was generally viewed as acceptable, and even helpful, when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making. Careful attention to a non-judgmental communication style is critical to safeguard against potential contraceptive coercion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling was acceptable among this diverse population, and our findings suggest ways to best structure such counseling. Coupled with research on clinician perspectives, our findings can inform development of patient-centered contraceptive counseling approaches that integrate abortion in an attempt to facilitate patient care and reduce stigma.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling can be acceptable, and even helpful, to patients when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision, even among patients who believed abortion should be illegal in all or most cases. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100029"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100029","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking the silence in the primary care office: patients' attitudes toward discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling\",\"authors\":\"Shokoufeh Dianat ,&nbsp;Ilana A Silverstein ,&nbsp;Kelsey Holt ,&nbsp;Jody Steinauer ,&nbsp;Christine Dehlendorf\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conx.2020.100029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Abortions are common health experiences in the United States, yet they are siloed from mainstream health care. To provide guidance on how clinicians could break down these silos, normalize conversations about abortion, and potentially improve patient experience and contraceptive decision-making, we sought to understand patient attitudes regarding discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>In 2018, we completed in-depth semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women recruited from primary care clinics of two politically disparate regions within California. We elicited acceptability, preferences, and implications of clinicians mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling. Using directed content analysis, we coded transcripts for inductive and deductive themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We achieved thematic saturation after 49 interviews. Interviewees were diverse in reproductive history, race/ethnicity, religiosity, and abortion attitudes. Participants with diverse attitudes about abortion reported that having abortion mentioned during contraceptive counseling was generally viewed as acceptable, and even helpful, when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making. Careful attention to a non-judgmental communication style is critical to safeguard against potential contraceptive coercion.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling was acceptable among this diverse population, and our findings suggest ways to best structure such counseling. Coupled with research on clinician perspectives, our findings can inform development of patient-centered contraceptive counseling approaches that integrate abortion in an attempt to facilitate patient care and reduce stigma.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling can be acceptable, and even helpful, to patients when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision, even among patients who believed abortion should be illegal in all or most cases. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception: X\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100029\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151620300125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在美国,堕胎是一种常见的健康经历,但却被主流医疗保健所孤立。为了指导临床医生如何打破这些孤岛,使堕胎对话正常化,并潜在地改善患者体验和避孕决策,我们试图了解患者在避孕咨询期间对讨论堕胎的态度。研究设计2018年,我们完成了对从加州两个政治不同地区的初级保健诊所招募的育龄妇女的深度半结构化访谈。我们引出了可接受性,偏好,和临床医生提及流产在避孕咨询的含义。使用定向内容分析,我们为归纳和演绎主题编码文本。结果49次访谈达到主题饱和。受访者的生育史、种族/民族、宗教信仰和堕胎态度各不相同。对堕胎持不同态度的参与者报告说,在避孕咨询中提到堕胎通常被认为是可以接受的,甚至是有帮助的,如果以非指示的方式侧重于提供信息。对一些患者来说,提及堕胎可能会减少堕胎的耻辱感,并有助于避孕决策。注意非评判性的沟通方式对于防止潜在的强制避孕至关重要。结论在这一多样化的人群中,在避孕咨询中讨论堕胎是可以接受的,我们的研究结果为最好地组织这种咨询提供了方法。结合对临床医生观点的研究,我们的发现可以为以患者为中心的避孕咨询方法的发展提供信息,这些方法将流产整合在一起,试图促进患者护理并减少耻辱感。在避孕咨询中提及堕胎是可以接受的,甚至是有帮助的,如果以非指示的方式提供信息,即使是那些认为堕胎在所有或大多数情况下都是非法的患者。对一些患者来说,提及堕胎可能会减少堕胎的耻辱感,并有助于避孕决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breaking the silence in the primary care office: patients' attitudes toward discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling

Objectives

Abortions are common health experiences in the United States, yet they are siloed from mainstream health care. To provide guidance on how clinicians could break down these silos, normalize conversations about abortion, and potentially improve patient experience and contraceptive decision-making, we sought to understand patient attitudes regarding discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling.

Study design

In 2018, we completed in-depth semi-structured interviews with reproductive-aged women recruited from primary care clinics of two politically disparate regions within California. We elicited acceptability, preferences, and implications of clinicians mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling. Using directed content analysis, we coded transcripts for inductive and deductive themes.

Results

We achieved thematic saturation after 49 interviews. Interviewees were diverse in reproductive history, race/ethnicity, religiosity, and abortion attitudes. Participants with diverse attitudes about abortion reported that having abortion mentioned during contraceptive counseling was generally viewed as acceptable, and even helpful, when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making. Careful attention to a non-judgmental communication style is critical to safeguard against potential contraceptive coercion.

Conclusions

Discussing abortion during contraceptive counseling was acceptable among this diverse population, and our findings suggest ways to best structure such counseling. Coupled with research on clinician perspectives, our findings can inform development of patient-centered contraceptive counseling approaches that integrate abortion in an attempt to facilitate patient care and reduce stigma.

Implications

Mentioning abortion during contraceptive counseling can be acceptable, and even helpful, to patients when delivered in a non-directive manner focused on information provision, even among patients who believed abortion should be illegal in all or most cases. For some patients, mentioning abortion may reduce abortion stigma and help contraceptive decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信