血管内入路治疗急性肢体缺血无溶栓治疗。

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Keisuke Fukuda, Yoshiaki Yokoi
{"title":"血管内入路治疗急性肢体缺血无溶栓治疗。","authors":"Keisuke Fukuda,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Yokoi","doi":"10.1177/1753944720924575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular therapy for acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) has developed and demonstrated safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients treated for ALLI with conventional endovascular or surgical revascularization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was a retrospective single-center review. Consecutive patients with ALLI treated with conventional endovascular revascularization (ER) without thrombolytic agent or surgical revascularization (SR) between 2008 and 2014 were investigated. The 1 year and 3 year amputation rate and mortality rate were assessed by time-to-event methods, including Kaplan-Meier estimation.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 64 limbs in 62 patients with ALLI due to thromboembolism or thrombosis of a native artery, bypass graft, or previous stented vessel were included. The majority of limbs (90.9%) presented with Rutherford clinical categories 1 to 2 ischemia. Technical success rate was 95.5% in ER and 92.9% in SR group (<i>p</i> = 0.547). Overall amputation rates were 9.1% in ER <i>versus</i> 9.5% in SR after 1 year (<i>p</i> = 0.971) and 9.1% in ER <i>versus</i> 11.9% in SR after 3 year (<i>p</i> = 0.742). Overall mortality rates were 15% in ER <i>versus</i> 7.1% in SR after 1 year (<i>p</i> = 0.491) and 15% in ER <i>versus</i> 11.2% in SR after 3 year (<i>p</i> = 0.878).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endovascular or surgical revascularization of ALLI resulted in comparable outcomes in limb salvage and mortality rate at 1 year and 3 year. Conventional endovascular therapy without thrombolytic agent such as stenting, balloon angioplasty, or catheter-directed thrombosuction may be considered as a treatment option for ALLI.</p>","PeriodicalId":23035,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753944720924575","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Keisuke Fukuda,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Yokoi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1753944720924575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endovascular therapy for acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) has developed and demonstrated safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients treated for ALLI with conventional endovascular or surgical revascularization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was a retrospective single-center review. Consecutive patients with ALLI treated with conventional endovascular revascularization (ER) without thrombolytic agent or surgical revascularization (SR) between 2008 and 2014 were investigated. The 1 year and 3 year amputation rate and mortality rate were assessed by time-to-event methods, including Kaplan-Meier estimation.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 64 limbs in 62 patients with ALLI due to thromboembolism or thrombosis of a native artery, bypass graft, or previous stented vessel were included. The majority of limbs (90.9%) presented with Rutherford clinical categories 1 to 2 ischemia. Technical success rate was 95.5% in ER and 92.9% in SR group (<i>p</i> = 0.547). Overall amputation rates were 9.1% in ER <i>versus</i> 9.5% in SR after 1 year (<i>p</i> = 0.971) and 9.1% in ER <i>versus</i> 11.9% in SR after 3 year (<i>p</i> = 0.742). Overall mortality rates were 15% in ER <i>versus</i> 7.1% in SR after 1 year (<i>p</i> = 0.491) and 15% in ER <i>versus</i> 11.2% in SR after 3 year (<i>p</i> = 0.878).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Endovascular or surgical revascularization of ALLI resulted in comparable outcomes in limb salvage and mortality rate at 1 year and 3 year. Conventional endovascular therapy without thrombolytic agent such as stenting, balloon angioplasty, or catheter-directed thrombosuction may be considered as a treatment option for ALLI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1753944720924575\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944720924575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944720924575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:血管内治疗急性下肢缺血(ALLI)已经发展并证明了安全性和有效性。本研究的目的是评估ALLI患者接受常规血管内或手术血运重建术治疗的临床结果。方法:本研究为回顾性单中心综述。对2008 - 2014年间连续接受常规血管内血运重建术(ER)或外科血运重建术(SR)治疗的ALLI患者进行研究。采用时间-事件法(包括Kaplan-Meier估计)评估1年和3年截肢率和死亡率。结果:62例因血栓栓塞或原生动脉血栓形成、搭桥或先前支架血管形成的ALLI患者共64肢被纳入研究。绝大多数肢体(90.9%)表现为卢瑟福临床1 ~ 2类缺血。ER组技术成功率为95.5%,SR组为92.9% (p = 0.547)。1年后ER组总体截肢率为9.1%,SR组为9.5% (p = 0.971), 3年后ER组为9.1%,SR组为11.9% (p = 0.742)。1年后ER组总死亡率为15%,SR组为7.1% (p = 0.491), 3年后ER组为15%,SR组为11.2% (p = 0.878)。结论:ALLI的血管内或手术血运重建术在1年和3年的肢体挽救和死亡率方面具有可比性。无溶栓剂的常规血管内治疗,如支架置入术、球囊血管成形术或导管定向血栓抽吸,可作为ALLI的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy.

Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy.

Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy.

Endovascular approach for acute limb ischemia without thrombolytic therapy.

Background: Endovascular therapy for acute lower limb ischemia (ALLI) has developed and demonstrated safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients treated for ALLI with conventional endovascular or surgical revascularization.

Method: This study was a retrospective single-center review. Consecutive patients with ALLI treated with conventional endovascular revascularization (ER) without thrombolytic agent or surgical revascularization (SR) between 2008 and 2014 were investigated. The 1 year and 3 year amputation rate and mortality rate were assessed by time-to-event methods, including Kaplan-Meier estimation.

Result: A total of 64 limbs in 62 patients with ALLI due to thromboembolism or thrombosis of a native artery, bypass graft, or previous stented vessel were included. The majority of limbs (90.9%) presented with Rutherford clinical categories 1 to 2 ischemia. Technical success rate was 95.5% in ER and 92.9% in SR group (p = 0.547). Overall amputation rates were 9.1% in ER versus 9.5% in SR after 1 year (p = 0.971) and 9.1% in ER versus 11.9% in SR after 3 year (p = 0.742). Overall mortality rates were 15% in ER versus 7.1% in SR after 1 year (p = 0.491) and 15% in ER versus 11.2% in SR after 3 year (p = 0.878).

Conclusion: Endovascular or surgical revascularization of ALLI resulted in comparable outcomes in limb salvage and mortality rate at 1 year and 3 year. Conventional endovascular therapy without thrombolytic agent such as stenting, balloon angioplasty, or catheter-directed thrombosuction may be considered as a treatment option for ALLI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is aimed at clinicians and researchers from the cardiovascular disease field and will be a forum for all views and reviews relating to this discipline.Topics covered will include: ·arteriosclerosis ·cardiomyopathies ·coronary artery disease ·diabetes ·heart failure ·hypertension ·metabolic syndrome ·obesity ·peripheral arterial disease ·stroke ·arrhythmias ·genetics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信