喜欢行动和十九国文化的纵向/横向维度:重视平等而不是等级制度促进了对行动的积极性。

Q3 Psychology
Interamerican Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2018-05-10
Dolores Albarracin, Christopher R Jones, Justin Hepler, Hong Li
{"title":"喜欢行动和十九国文化的纵向/横向维度:重视平等而不是等级制度促进了对行动的积极性。","authors":"Dolores Albarracin,&nbsp;Christopher R Jones,&nbsp;Justin Hepler,&nbsp;Hong Li","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The question of who should act, and how often, is critical for cultures and the regulation of social behavior. The vertical/horizontal dimension of culture describes the relative valuing of hierarchy versus equality. In a horizontal culture valuing equality, responsibility for action is more widely distributed than in a vertical culture valuing hierarchy. The relation between this cultural dimension and general attitudes towards action and inaction was tested with a large-scale survey of respondents from 19 nations. A multi-level model indicated that liking for action was especially associated with horizontality--the valuing of equality. Although values can generally be expressed through various compatible actions, horizontality (valuing equality) entails endorsing distributed responsibility for action and its outcomes, promoting general favorability towards action. In contrast, verticality includes countervailing components that discourage action by promoting norms that constrain who should act in accordance to status.</p>","PeriodicalId":35206,"journal":{"name":"Interamerican Journal of Psychology","volume":"51 3","pages":"335-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176319/pdf/nihms-934516.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liking for Action and the Vertical/Horizontal Dimension of Culture in Nineteen Nations: Valuing Equality over Hierarchy Promotes Positivity Towards Action.\",\"authors\":\"Dolores Albarracin,&nbsp;Christopher R Jones,&nbsp;Justin Hepler,&nbsp;Hong Li\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The question of who should act, and how often, is critical for cultures and the regulation of social behavior. The vertical/horizontal dimension of culture describes the relative valuing of hierarchy versus equality. In a horizontal culture valuing equality, responsibility for action is more widely distributed than in a vertical culture valuing hierarchy. The relation between this cultural dimension and general attitudes towards action and inaction was tested with a large-scale survey of respondents from 19 nations. A multi-level model indicated that liking for action was especially associated with horizontality--the valuing of equality. Although values can generally be expressed through various compatible actions, horizontality (valuing equality) entails endorsing distributed responsibility for action and its outcomes, promoting general favorability towards action. In contrast, verticality includes countervailing components that discourage action by promoting norms that constrain who should act in accordance to status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interamerican Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"51 3\",\"pages\":\"335-343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176319/pdf/nihms-934516.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interamerican Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interamerican Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

谁应该行动,以及多久行动一次的问题,对文化和社会行为的规范至关重要。文化的垂直/水平维度描述了等级与平等的相对价值。在重视平等的水平文化中,行动的责任比重视等级的垂直文化分配得更广泛。对来自19个国家的受访者进行了一项大规模调查,测试了这一文化层面与人们对作为与不作为的普遍态度之间的关系。一个多层次的模型表明,对行动的喜爱与水平性(即对平等的重视)尤其相关。虽然价值观通常可以通过各种兼容的行动来表达,但水平性(重视平等)需要赞同行动及其结果的责任分配,从而促进对行动的普遍好感。相反,垂直性包括反补贴成分,通过促进规范来限制谁应该根据地位采取行动,从而阻碍行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liking for Action and the Vertical/Horizontal Dimension of Culture in Nineteen Nations: Valuing Equality over Hierarchy Promotes Positivity Towards Action.

The question of who should act, and how often, is critical for cultures and the regulation of social behavior. The vertical/horizontal dimension of culture describes the relative valuing of hierarchy versus equality. In a horizontal culture valuing equality, responsibility for action is more widely distributed than in a vertical culture valuing hierarchy. The relation between this cultural dimension and general attitudes towards action and inaction was tested with a large-scale survey of respondents from 19 nations. A multi-level model indicated that liking for action was especially associated with horizontality--the valuing of equality. Although values can generally be expressed through various compatible actions, horizontality (valuing equality) entails endorsing distributed responsibility for action and its outcomes, promoting general favorability towards action. In contrast, verticality includes countervailing components that discourage action by promoting norms that constrain who should act in accordance to status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interamerican Journal of Psychology
Interamerican Journal of Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信