标准化措施能否对成人保护服务的真实性提供有益的反馈?试点数据来自一个简短的自我忽视评估。

IF 1.6 2区心理学 Q3 GERONTOLOGY

Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2020-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-04-03 DOI:10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837

Pi-Ju Liu, Sara K Stratton, Zachary Hass, Kendon J Conrad

{"title":"标准化措施能否对成人保护服务的真实性提供有益的反馈?试点数据来自一个简短的自我忽视评估。","authors":"Pi-Ju Liu, Sara K Stratton, Zachary Hass, Kendon J Conrad","doi":"10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Can standardized assessment contribute to improving Adult Protective Services (APS) practice? In this exploratory study, San Francisco and Napa APS utilized a newly developed short self-neglect assessment to test how standardized measures provide information for substantiation decision making. Findings demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity for the short self-neglect assessment, and analyses revealed important issues that could improve practice. Review of outliers revealed: (1) problems using the assessment tool, (2) misunderstandings of APS procedures, and (3) struggles navigating the case management system. These revelations could all be easily addressed in training. Caseworker’s clinical judgment and experience also continue to have a place in complementing the use of the standardized assessment.","PeriodicalId":46983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","volume":"32 3","pages":"259-274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can standardized measures provide helpful feedback about adult protective services substantiation? Pilot data from a short self-neglect assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Pi-Ju Liu, Sara K Stratton, Zachary Hass, Kendon J Conrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Can standardized assessment contribute to improving Adult Protective Services (APS) practice? In this exploratory study, San Francisco and Napa APS utilized a newly developed short self-neglect assessment to test how standardized measures provide information for substantiation decision making. Findings demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity for the short self-neglect assessment, and analyses revealed important issues that could improve practice. Review of outliers revealed: (1) problems using the assessment tool, (2) misunderstandings of APS procedures, and (3) struggles navigating the case management system. These revelations could all be easily addressed in training. Caseworker’s clinical judgment and experience also continue to have a place in complementing the use of the standardized assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"259-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/4/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2020.1742837","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

标准化评估是否有助于改善成人保护服务(APS)的做法?在这项探索性研究中，旧金山和纳帕APS利用新开发的简短自我忽视评估来测试标准化措施如何为实证决策提供信息。研究结果表明，短期自我忽视评估的信度和效度令人满意，分析揭示了可以改进实践的重要问题。对异常值的回顾揭示了:(1)使用评估工具的问题，(2)对APS程序的误解，以及(3)在案例管理系统中导航的困难。这些启示都可以在培训中轻易解决。个案工作者的临床判断和经验也继续在补充标准化评估的使用中占有一席之地。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Can standardized measures provide helpful feedback about adult protective services substantiation? Pilot data from a short self-neglect assessment.

ABSTRACT Can standardized assessment contribute to improving Adult Protective Services (APS) practice? In this exploratory study, San Francisco and Napa APS utilized a newly developed short self-neglect assessment to test how standardized measures provide information for substantiation decision making. Findings demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity for the short self-neglect assessment, and analyses revealed important issues that could improve practice. Review of outliers revealed: (1) problems using the assessment tool, (2) misunderstandings of APS procedures, and (3) struggles navigating the case management system. These revelations could all be easily addressed in training. Caseworker’s clinical judgment and experience also continue to have a place in complementing the use of the standardized assessment.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect GERONTOLOGY-

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

15.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect is the peer-reviewed quarterly journal that explores the advances in research, policy and practice, and clinical and ethical issues surrounding the abuse and neglect of older people. This unique forum provides state-of-the-art research and practice that is both international and multidisciplinary in scope. The journal"s broad, comprehensive approach is only one of its strengths—it presents training issues, research findings, case studies, practice and policy issues, book and media reviews, commentary, and historical background on a wide range of topics. Readers get tools and techniques needed for better detecting and responding to actual or potential elder abuse and neglect.