牛皮质膜在大鼠颅骨严重缺损中的骨促进能力:组织学和免疫组织化学分析。

IF 3 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
International Journal of Biomaterials Pub Date : 2020-02-18 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/6426702
Carolina Ferrairo Danieletto-Zanna, Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli, Guilherme André Del Arco Ramires, Tamires Melo Francatti, Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho, Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi
{"title":"牛皮质膜在大鼠颅骨严重缺损中的骨促进能力:组织学和免疫组织化学分析。","authors":"Carolina Ferrairo Danieletto-Zanna,&nbsp;Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli,&nbsp;Guilherme André Del Arco Ramires,&nbsp;Tamires Melo Francatti,&nbsp;Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho,&nbsp;Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi","doi":"10.1155/2020/6426702","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Membranes that aid the guided bone regeneration (GBR) process have been the subject of studies of compatible biomaterials that contribute to this repair process. The present study compared different membranes used in critical-size defects of rat calvaria by assessing GBR as well as histological, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical reactions. Forty-eight male albino Wistar rats were randomly allocated into four groups (<i>n</i> = 12 each), namely, C: membrane-free control group (only blood clot, negative control group); BG: porcine collagen membrane group (Bio-Gide®, positive control group); GD: bovine cortical membrane group (first experimental group); and GDF: thicker bovine cortical membrane group (second experimental group). Rats were euthanized at 30 and 60 days postoperatively. Quantitative data from the histometric analysis were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's posttest when <i>p</i> < 0.05. Histomorphometric results of the thicker bovine cortical membrane at 30 and 60 days were promising, showing improved new bone formation values (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and the CD group presented similar results in both analysis periods, being surpassed only by the GDF group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The immunohistochemical results were associated with the histomorphometric data. A less-thick membrane also assisted in GBR. All membranes promoted GBR, especially the positive control and experimental groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":13704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomaterials","volume":"2020 ","pages":"6426702"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/6426702","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osteopromotion Capacity of Bovine Cortical Membranes in Critical Defects of Rat Calvaria: Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Carolina Ferrairo Danieletto-Zanna,&nbsp;Vinícius Ferreira Bizelli,&nbsp;Guilherme André Del Arco Ramires,&nbsp;Tamires Melo Francatti,&nbsp;Paulo Sérgio Perri de Carvalho,&nbsp;Ana Paula Farnezi Bassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2020/6426702\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Membranes that aid the guided bone regeneration (GBR) process have been the subject of studies of compatible biomaterials that contribute to this repair process. The present study compared different membranes used in critical-size defects of rat calvaria by assessing GBR as well as histological, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical reactions. Forty-eight male albino Wistar rats were randomly allocated into four groups (<i>n</i> = 12 each), namely, C: membrane-free control group (only blood clot, negative control group); BG: porcine collagen membrane group (Bio-Gide®, positive control group); GD: bovine cortical membrane group (first experimental group); and GDF: thicker bovine cortical membrane group (second experimental group). Rats were euthanized at 30 and 60 days postoperatively. Quantitative data from the histometric analysis were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's posttest when <i>p</i> < 0.05. Histomorphometric results of the thicker bovine cortical membrane at 30 and 60 days were promising, showing improved new bone formation values (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and the CD group presented similar results in both analysis periods, being surpassed only by the GDF group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The immunohistochemical results were associated with the histomorphometric data. A less-thick membrane also assisted in GBR. All membranes promoted GBR, especially the positive control and experimental groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"2020 \",\"pages\":\"6426702\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/6426702\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6426702\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6426702","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

有助于引导骨再生(GBR)过程的膜一直是促进这一修复过程的相容性生物材料研究的主题。本研究通过评估GBR以及组织学、组织形态计量学和免疫组织化学反应,比较了用于大鼠颅骨临界尺寸缺陷的不同膜。48只雄性白化Wistar大鼠随机分为4组,每组n = 12,即C:无膜对照组(仅血凝块,阴性对照组);BG:猪胶原膜组(Bio-Gide®,阳性对照组);GD:牛皮质膜组(第一实验组);GDF:较厚牛皮质膜组(第二实验组)。大鼠分别于术后30天和60天实施安乐死。组织计量分析的定量数据在p < 0.05时采用双向方差分析和Tukey后验。较厚的牛皮质膜在第30天和第60天的组织形态测量结果是有希望的,显示出更好的新骨形成值(p < 0.05), CD组在两个分析周期的结果相似,仅GDF组超过(p < 0.05)。免疫组化结果与组织形态学数据相关联。较薄的膜也有助于GBR。所有膜均促进GBR,尤其是阳性对照组和实验组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Osteopromotion Capacity of Bovine Cortical Membranes in Critical Defects of Rat Calvaria: Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis.

Osteopromotion Capacity of Bovine Cortical Membranes in Critical Defects of Rat Calvaria: Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis.

Osteopromotion Capacity of Bovine Cortical Membranes in Critical Defects of Rat Calvaria: Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis.

Osteopromotion Capacity of Bovine Cortical Membranes in Critical Defects of Rat Calvaria: Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis.

Membranes that aid the guided bone regeneration (GBR) process have been the subject of studies of compatible biomaterials that contribute to this repair process. The present study compared different membranes used in critical-size defects of rat calvaria by assessing GBR as well as histological, histomorphometric, and immunohistochemical reactions. Forty-eight male albino Wistar rats were randomly allocated into four groups (n = 12 each), namely, C: membrane-free control group (only blood clot, negative control group); BG: porcine collagen membrane group (Bio-Gide®, positive control group); GD: bovine cortical membrane group (first experimental group); and GDF: thicker bovine cortical membrane group (second experimental group). Rats were euthanized at 30 and 60 days postoperatively. Quantitative data from the histometric analysis were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's posttest when p < 0.05. Histomorphometric results of the thicker bovine cortical membrane at 30 and 60 days were promising, showing improved new bone formation values (p < 0.05), and the CD group presented similar results in both analysis periods, being surpassed only by the GDF group (p < 0.05). The immunohistochemical results were associated with the histomorphometric data. A less-thick membrane also assisted in GBR. All membranes promoted GBR, especially the positive control and experimental groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Biomaterials
International Journal of Biomaterials MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
50
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信