[对电磁场暴露风险的评估,特别涉及对敏感对象的保护]。

IF 0.4 Q3 Medicine
Rosaria Falsaperla, Eugenio Mattei, Federica Censi, Andrea Bogi, Iole Pinto, Giovanni Calcagnini
{"title":"[对电磁场暴露风险的评估,特别涉及对敏感对象的保护]。","authors":"Rosaria Falsaperla,&nbsp;Eugenio Mattei,&nbsp;Federica Censi,&nbsp;Andrea Bogi,&nbsp;Iole Pinto,&nbsp;Giovanni Calcagnini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Purpose. The work illustrates useful elements for the risk assessment for workers exposed to electromagnetic fields, also in reference to sensitive subjects such as those with active implantable medical devices (AIMD). Methods. The approach introduced by Legislative Decree 81/08 for risk assessment does not explicitly include operational criteria and specific measures for the protection of sensitive subjects. In the case of workers with DMIA, the employer may refer to relevant harmonized technical standards. Results. They are shown the results of in vitro tests performed on pacemakers following the indications of the technical reference standard and employing sources of electromagnetic fields that, due to the type of signal emitted, do not allow to exclude an a priori influence on the operation of the device. Conclusions. Workers at particular risk are generally protected if the requirements established for the population are respected. This measure may, under certain conditions, not be sufficient,making it necessary to carry out more in-depth and individual assessments. However, the cases illustrated here for AIMD showed interference phenomena only in limited experimental configurations despite the levels of the electric and magnetic fields generated by the sources exceeding the limits for the general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12674,"journal":{"name":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","volume":"41 4","pages":"280-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Assessment of the risk due to exposure to EMF with particular reference to the protection of sensitive subjects].\",\"authors\":\"Rosaria Falsaperla,&nbsp;Eugenio Mattei,&nbsp;Federica Censi,&nbsp;Andrea Bogi,&nbsp;Iole Pinto,&nbsp;Giovanni Calcagnini\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Purpose. The work illustrates useful elements for the risk assessment for workers exposed to electromagnetic fields, also in reference to sensitive subjects such as those with active implantable medical devices (AIMD). Methods. The approach introduced by Legislative Decree 81/08 for risk assessment does not explicitly include operational criteria and specific measures for the protection of sensitive subjects. In the case of workers with DMIA, the employer may refer to relevant harmonized technical standards. Results. They are shown the results of in vitro tests performed on pacemakers following the indications of the technical reference standard and employing sources of electromagnetic fields that, due to the type of signal emitted, do not allow to exclude an a priori influence on the operation of the device. Conclusions. Workers at particular risk are generally protected if the requirements established for the population are respected. This measure may, under certain conditions, not be sufficient,making it necessary to carry out more in-depth and individual assessments. However, the cases illustrated here for AIMD showed interference phenomena only in limited experimental configurations despite the levels of the electric and magnetic fields generated by the sources exceeding the limits for the general population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia\",\"volume\":\"41 4\",\"pages\":\"280-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:目的。这项工作说明了对接触电磁场的工人进行风险评估的有用因素,也涉及敏感对象,例如那些带有主动植入式医疗装置(AIMD)的人。方法。第81/08号法令所采用的风险评估方法没有明确包括保护敏感对象的操作标准和具体措施。对于患有DMIA的工人,雇主可以参考相关的协调技术标准。结果。他们展示了根据技术参考标准的指示对起搏器进行的体外测试的结果,并使用了电磁场源,由于所发射的信号类型,不允许排除对设备操作的先验影响。结论。如果遵守为人口制定的要求,处于特殊危险的工人通常会受到保护。在某些条件下,这一措施可能是不够的,因此有必要进行更深入和个别的评估。然而,尽管源产生的电场和磁场水平超过了一般人群的限制,但这里为AIMD所说明的案例仅在有限的实验配置中显示了干扰现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Assessment of the risk due to exposure to EMF with particular reference to the protection of sensitive subjects].

Summary: Purpose. The work illustrates useful elements for the risk assessment for workers exposed to electromagnetic fields, also in reference to sensitive subjects such as those with active implantable medical devices (AIMD). Methods. The approach introduced by Legislative Decree 81/08 for risk assessment does not explicitly include operational criteria and specific measures for the protection of sensitive subjects. In the case of workers with DMIA, the employer may refer to relevant harmonized technical standards. Results. They are shown the results of in vitro tests performed on pacemakers following the indications of the technical reference standard and employing sources of electromagnetic fields that, due to the type of signal emitted, do not allow to exclude an a priori influence on the operation of the device. Conclusions. Workers at particular risk are generally protected if the requirements established for the population are respected. This measure may, under certain conditions, not be sufficient,making it necessary to carry out more in-depth and individual assessments. However, the cases illustrated here for AIMD showed interference phenomena only in limited experimental configurations despite the levels of the electric and magnetic fields generated by the sources exceeding the limits for the general population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia
Giornale italiano di medicina del lavoro ed ergonomia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信